| Message ID | 20220114234825.110502-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Awaiting Upstream |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | rtw88: four small code-cleanups and refactorings | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:48 AM > To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com; kvalo@codeaurora.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Neo Jou <neojou@gmail.com>; Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>; Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>; Martin > Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rtw88: Move enum rtw_tx_queue_type mapping code to tx.{c,h} > > This code is not specific to the PCIe bus type but can be re-used by USB > and SDIO bus types. Move it to tx.{c,h} to avoid code-duplication in the > future. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> [...] > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > index efcc1b0371a8..ec6a3683c3f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c > @@ -665,3 +665,38 @@ void rtw_txq_cleanup(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_txq *txq) > list_del_init(&rtwtxq->list); > spin_unlock_bh(&rtwdev->txq_lock); > } > + > +static enum rtw_tx_queue_type ac_to_hwq[] = { > + [IEEE80211_AC_VO] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO, > + [IEEE80211_AC_VI] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VI, > + [IEEE80211_AC_BE] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE, > + [IEEE80211_AC_BK] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BK, > +}; > + > +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq) == IEEE80211_NUM_ACS); > + > +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq(enum ieee80211_ac_numbers ac) > +{ > + return ac_to_hwq[ac]; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq); > + Could I know why we can't just export the array ac_to_hwq[]? Is there a strict rule? -- Ping-Ke
Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:48 AM >> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com; kvalo@codeaurora.org; >> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> Neo Jou <neojou@gmail.com>; Jernej Skrabec >> <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>; Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>; Martin >> Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rtw88: Move enum rtw_tx_queue_type mapping code to tx.{c,h} >> >> This code is not specific to the PCIe bus type but can be re-used by USB >> and SDIO bus types. Move it to tx.{c,h} to avoid code-duplication in the >> future. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > [...] > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c >> index efcc1b0371a8..ec6a3683c3f8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c >> @@ -665,3 +665,38 @@ void rtw_txq_cleanup(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_txq *txq) >> list_del_init(&rtwtxq->list); >> spin_unlock_bh(&rtwdev->txq_lock); >> } >> + >> +static enum rtw_tx_queue_type ac_to_hwq[] = { >> + [IEEE80211_AC_VO] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO, >> + [IEEE80211_AC_VI] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VI, >> + [IEEE80211_AC_BE] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE, >> + [IEEE80211_AC_BK] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BK, >> +}; >> + >> +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq) == IEEE80211_NUM_ACS); >> + >> +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq(enum ieee80211_ac_numbers ac) >> +{ >> + return ac_to_hwq[ac]; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq); >> + > > Could I know why we can't just export the array ac_to_hwq[]? > Is there a strict rule? I was about to answer that with a helper function it's easier to catch out of bands access, but then noticed the helper doesn't have a check for that. Should it have one?
Hi Kalle, On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:20 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote: [...] > I was about to answer that with a helper function it's easier to catch > out of bands access, but then noticed the helper doesn't have a check > for that. Should it have one? you mean something like: if (ac >= IEEE80211_NUM_ACS) return RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE; Possibly also with a WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE Best regards, Martin
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes: > Hi Kalle, > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:20 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote: > [...] >> I was about to answer that with a helper function it's easier to catch >> out of bands access, but then noticed the helper doesn't have a check >> for that. Should it have one? > > you mean something like: > if (ac >= IEEE80211_NUM_ACS) > return RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE; > > Possibly also with a WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE Yeah, something like that would be good.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c index 2da057d18188..945411a5947b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c @@ -670,34 +670,6 @@ static void rtw_pci_deep_ps(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enter) spin_unlock_bh(&rtwpci->irq_lock); } -static enum rtw_tx_queue_type ac_to_hwq[] = { - [IEEE80211_AC_VO] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO, - [IEEE80211_AC_VI] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VI, - [IEEE80211_AC_BE] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE, - [IEEE80211_AC_BK] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BK, -}; - -static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq) == IEEE80211_NUM_ACS); - -static enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_hw_queue_mapping(struct sk_buff *skb) -{ - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; - __le16 fc = hdr->frame_control; - u8 q_mapping = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb); - enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue; - - if (unlikely(ieee80211_is_beacon(fc))) - queue = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BCN; - else if (unlikely(ieee80211_is_mgmt(fc) || ieee80211_is_ctl(fc))) - queue = RTW_TX_QUEUE_MGMT; - else if (WARN_ON_ONCE(q_mapping >= ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq))) - queue = ac_to_hwq[IEEE80211_AC_BE]; - else - queue = ac_to_hwq[q_mapping]; - - return queue; -} - static void rtw_pci_release_rsvd_page(struct rtw_pci *rtwpci, struct rtw_pci_tx_ring *ring) { @@ -795,7 +767,7 @@ static void rtw_pci_flush_queues(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 queues, bool drop) } else { for (i = 0; i < rtwdev->hw->queues; i++) if (queues & BIT(i)) - pci_queues |= BIT(ac_to_hwq[i]); + pci_queues |= BIT(rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq(i)); } __rtw_pci_flush_queues(rtwdev, pci_queues, drop); @@ -949,7 +921,7 @@ static int rtw_pci_tx_write(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_tx_pkt_info *pkt_info, struct sk_buff *skb) { - enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue = rtw_hw_queue_mapping(skb); + enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue = rtw_tx_queue_mapping(skb); struct rtw_pci *rtwpci = (struct rtw_pci *)rtwdev->priv; struct rtw_pci_tx_ring *ring; int ret; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c index efcc1b0371a8..ec6a3683c3f8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c @@ -665,3 +665,38 @@ void rtw_txq_cleanup(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_txq *txq) list_del_init(&rtwtxq->list); spin_unlock_bh(&rtwdev->txq_lock); } + +static enum rtw_tx_queue_type ac_to_hwq[] = { + [IEEE80211_AC_VO] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO, + [IEEE80211_AC_VI] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_VI, + [IEEE80211_AC_BE] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BE, + [IEEE80211_AC_BK] = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BK, +}; + +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq) == IEEE80211_NUM_ACS); + +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq(enum ieee80211_ac_numbers ac) +{ + return ac_to_hwq[ac]; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq); + +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_queue_mapping(struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; + __le16 fc = hdr->frame_control; + u8 q_mapping = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb); + enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue; + + if (unlikely(ieee80211_is_beacon(fc))) + queue = RTW_TX_QUEUE_BCN; + else if (unlikely(ieee80211_is_mgmt(fc) || ieee80211_is_ctl(fc))) + queue = RTW_TX_QUEUE_MGMT; + else if (WARN_ON_ONCE(q_mapping >= ARRAY_SIZE(ac_to_hwq))) + queue = ac_to_hwq[IEEE80211_AC_BE]; + else + queue = ac_to_hwq[q_mapping]; + + return queue; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_tx_queue_mapping); diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h index 56371eff9f7f..940f944fd39c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h @@ -119,4 +119,7 @@ rtw_tx_write_data_h2c_get(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_tx_pkt_info *pkt_info, u8 *buf, u32 size); +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_ac_to_hwq(enum ieee80211_ac_numbers ac); +enum rtw_tx_queue_type rtw_tx_queue_mapping(struct sk_buff *skb); + #endif
This code is not specific to the PCIe bus type but can be re-used by USB and SDIO bus types. Move it to tx.{c,h} to avoid code-duplication in the future. Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c | 32 ++-------------------- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)