Message ID | 20220111091950.840-1-hnarukaw@yahoo-corp.jp (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Patch to adjust coroutine pool size adaptively | expand |
ping, how is the status of this patch? Link for this patch v2 on patchew is this one: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220111091950.840-1-hnarukaw@yahoo-corp.jp/ The last message on patch v1 is this one: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/TYCPR01MB8357E8D13D661265CDBB442C80519@TYCPR01MB8357.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/T/#u The difference from v1 is use of qatomic_read(). > Resending patch with fixing atomic access method to use qatomic_read(). > > We encountered random disk IO performance drop since qemu-5.0.0, and this > patch fixes it. > > Commit message in c740ad92 implied to adjust coroutine pool size adaptively, so I > tried to implement this. > > Could you review this patch? > > > Hiroki Narukawa (1): > util: adjust coroutine pool size to virtio block queue > > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 3 +++ > include/qemu/coroutine.h | 5 +++++ > util/qemu-coroutine.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:01:30AM +0000, Hiroki Narukawa wrote: > ping, how is the status of this patch? > > Link for this patch v2 on patchew is this one: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220111091950.840-1-hnarukaw@yahoo-corp.jp/ > The last message on patch v1 is this one: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/TYCPR01MB8357E8D13D661265CDBB442C80519@TYCPR01MB8357.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/T/#u > > The difference from v1 is use of qatomic_read(). Hi, Sorry for the slow response. I will review this tomorrow (Thursday)! Stefan