| Message ID | cover.1641987128.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | virtio: Add vhost-user-gpio device's support | expand |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > > A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > > https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? We also need some maintainers to step up. > -- > Viresh > > Viresh Kumar (2): > hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device > hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate > > hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + > hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + > hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ > hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ > 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h > > -- > 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. >> >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: >> >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > > I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. > Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? This is going to be a problem going forward as we have more out-of-tree backends written as a first preference. While the first couple of vhost devices have C implementations in contrib before we worked on the rust version I think we are getting to the point of skipping a first C version for future devices. However I notice we have qtest/vhost-user-test.c so would that be enough to ensure we can instantiate the device and a basic vhost-user initialisation sequence doesn't cause it to crap out. This obviously won't be exercising the virtq processing itself but does that really exercise any of QEMU's boilerplate anyway? > We also need some maintainers to step up. You mean more reviewers for the vhost and virtio sections of QEMU's maintainers? > > >> -- >> Viresh >> >> Viresh Kumar (2): >> hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device >> hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate >> >> hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + >> hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ >> 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c >> create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h >> >> -- >> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
On 17-01-22, 10:11, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > >> > >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > >> > >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > > > > > I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. > > Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? I actually have one already, that I wrote before attempting the Rust counterpart, but never upstreamed as I am not sure if anyone is ever going to use it, as I am not. And I thought what's the point of merging code which I will never end up using. I am not sure what test I can add here to make sure this doesn't breaks in future though. > This is going to be a problem going forward as we have more out-of-tree > backends written as a first preference. While the first couple of vhost > devices have C implementations in contrib before we worked on the rust > version I think we are getting to the point of skipping a first C > version for future devices. > > However I notice we have qtest/vhost-user-test.c so would that be enough > to ensure we can instantiate the device and a basic vhost-user > initialisation sequence doesn't cause it to crap out. This obviously > won't be exercising the virtq processing itself but does that really > exercise any of QEMU's boilerplate anyway? > > > We also need some maintainers to step up. > > You mean more reviewers for the vhost and virtio sections of QEMU's > maintainers? And I too was waiting for replies on these. I can surely write something up if you guys feel there is a need. I just want to understand it better.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:32:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-01-22, 10:11, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > > >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > > >> > > >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > > > > > > > > I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. > > > Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? > > I actually have one already, that I wrote before attempting the Rust > counterpart, but never upstreamed as I am not sure if anyone is ever > going to use it, as I am not. And I thought what's the point of > merging code which I will never end up using. > > I am not sure what test I can add here to make sure this doesn't > breaks in future though. something that executes with make check. > > This is going to be a problem going forward as we have more out-of-tree > > backends written as a first preference. While the first couple of vhost > > devices have C implementations in contrib before we worked on the rust > > version I think we are getting to the point of skipping a first C > > version for future devices. > > > > However I notice we have qtest/vhost-user-test.c so would that be enough > > to ensure we can instantiate the device and a basic vhost-user > > initialisation sequence doesn't cause it to crap out. This obviously > > won't be exercising the virtq processing itself but does that really > > exercise any of QEMU's boilerplate anyway? > > > > > We also need some maintainers to step up. > > > > You mean more reviewers for the vhost and virtio sections of QEMU's > > maintainers? > > And I too was waiting for replies on these. I can surely write > something up if you guys feel there is a need. I just want to > understand it better. > > -- > viresh
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:11:21AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > >> > >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > >> > >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > > > > > I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. > > Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? > > This is going to be a problem going forward as we have more out-of-tree > backends written as a first preference. While the first couple of vhost > devices have C implementations in contrib before we worked on the rust > version I think we are getting to the point of skipping a first C > version for future devices. Not sure what to do then. Integrate using submodules somehow? > However I notice we have qtest/vhost-user-test.c so would that be enough > to ensure we can instantiate the device and a basic vhost-user > initialisation sequence doesn't cause it to crap out. This obviously > won't be exercising the virtq processing itself but does that really > exercise any of QEMU's boilerplate anyway? we do have tests e.g. for network based on vhost-user, yes. > > We also need some maintainers to step up. > > You mean more reviewers for the vhost and virtio sections of QEMU's > maintainers? > > > > > > >> -- > >> Viresh > >> > >> Viresh Kumar (2): > >> hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device > >> hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate > >> > >> hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + > >> hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + > >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ > >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ > >> 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c > >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c > >> create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h > >> > >> -- > >> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514 > > > -- > Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:32:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 17-01-22, 10:11, Alex Bennée wrote: >> > >> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> > >> > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > >> Hello, >> > >> >> > >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the >> > >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. >> > >> >> > >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: >> > >> >> > >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 >> > > >> > > >> > > I'm reluctant to add this with no tests in tree. >> > > Want to write a minimal libhost-user based backend? >> >> I actually have one already, that I wrote before attempting the Rust >> counterpart, but never upstreamed as I am not sure if anyone is ever >> going to use it, as I am not. And I thought what's the point of >> merging code which I will never end up using. >> >> I am not sure what test I can add here to make sure this doesn't >> breaks in future though. > > something that executes with make check. With Eric's latest series (20220118203833.316741-1-eric.auger@redhat.com) we are already exercising most of the PCI code: ➜ gcov ./libqemu-aarch64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_virtio_vhost-user-gpio.c.gcda File '../../hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c' Lines executed:10.43% of 163 Creating 'vhost-user-gpio.c.gcov' File '/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/include/qemu/bitops.h' Lines executed:100.00% of 4 Creating 'bitops.h.gcov' File '/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h' Lines executed:12.50% of 8 Creating 'virtio.h.gcov' File '/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h' Lines executed:0.00% of 1 Creating 'vhost-user-gpio.h.gcov' File '/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h' Lines executed:0.00% of 1 Creating 'virtio-bus.h.gcov' File '/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/include/hw/qdev-core.h' Lines executed:50.00% of 2 Creating 'qdev-core.h.gcov'
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > > A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > > https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 So I'm waiting for v2 of this, right? > -- > Viresh > > Viresh Kumar (2): > hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device > hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate > > hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + > hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + > hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ > hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ > 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h > > -- > 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. >> >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: >> >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > So I'm waiting for v2 of this, right? If you can give any pointers for how to properly instantiate the stub in qtest then we can spin v2 pretty quickly. I tried but it didn't work: Subject: [RFC PATCH] tests/qtest: attempt to enable tests for virtio-gpio (!working) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:15:34 +0000 Message-Id: <20220121151534.3654562-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> References: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> it's all a bit opaque as to why it didn't. > >> -- >> Viresh >> >> Viresh Kumar (2): >> hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device >> hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate >> >> hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + >> hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ >> 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c >> create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h >> >> -- >> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 01:52:47PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > >> > >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > >> > >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 > > > > So I'm waiting for v2 of this, right? > > If you can give any pointers for how to properly instantiate the stub in > qtest then we can spin v2 pretty quickly. I tried but it didn't work: > > Subject: [RFC PATCH] tests/qtest: attempt to enable tests for virtio-gpio (!working) > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:15:34 +0000 > Message-Id: <20220121151534.3654562-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 > In-Reply-To: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> > References: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> > > it's all a bit opaque as to why it didn't. A bit rushed short term, it this isn't resolved soon I'll try to help. Maybe try CC other vhost-user maintainers (for blk,gpu etc) meanwhile. > > > >> -- > >> Viresh > >> > >> Viresh Kumar (2): > >> hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio device > >> hw/virtio: add vhost-user-gpio-pci boilerplate > >> > >> hw/virtio/Kconfig | 5 + > >> hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 + > >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c | 69 ++++++ > >> hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h | 35 +++ > >> 5 files changed, 454 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio-pci.c > >> create mode 100644 hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.c > >> create mode 100644 include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-gpio.h > >> > >> -- > >> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514 > > > -- > Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 01:52:47PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:04:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the >> >> same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. >> >> >> >> A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 >> > >> > So I'm waiting for v2 of this, right? >> >> If you can give any pointers for how to properly instantiate the stub in >> qtest then we can spin v2 pretty quickly. I tried but it didn't work: >> >> Subject: [RFC PATCH] tests/qtest: attempt to enable tests for virtio-gpio (!working) >> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:15:34 +0000 >> Message-Id: <20220121151534.3654562-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> >> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 >> In-Reply-To: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> >> References: <20220120040234.ehcjcdr6wrvlz3yc@vireshk-i7> >> >> it's all a bit opaque as to why it didn't. > > A bit rushed short term, it this isn't resolved soon I'll try to help. > Maybe try CC other vhost-user maintainers (for blk,gpu etc) meanwhile. I have expanded the CC list for this thread and the RFC patch to see if anyone has pointers. I'll pull this series into my vhost cleanups series for post 7.0.
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes: > Hello, > > This patchset adds vhost-user-gpio device's support in Qemu. The support for the > same has already been added to virtio specification and Linux Kernel. > > A Rust based backend is also in progress and is tested against this patchset: > > https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device/pull/76 Queued to virtio/virtio-cleanups-and-gpio-v2, thanks.