Message ID | 20220209082828.2629273-4-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | ebd04737637b0bf249b48ea85a076e187ec86a77 |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/7] cxlflash: query write_zeroes limit for zeroing | expand |
On 2/9/22 12:28 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > even merged. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
On 2/9/22 4:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > even merged. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de> > --- > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 7 ++----- > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h | 1 - > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h | 6 ------ > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 3 +-- > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > index c08971de369fc..dc192d2738854 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev, > dev->nsectors = le64_to_cpu(rsp->nsectors); > dev->logical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->logical_block_size); > dev->physical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->physical_block_size); > - dev->max_write_same_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_write_same_sectors); > dev->max_discard_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_discard_sectors); > dev->discard_granularity = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_granularity); > dev->discard_alignment = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_alignment); > @@ -1359,8 +1358,6 @@ static void setup_request_queue(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev) > blk_queue_logical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->logical_block_size); > blk_queue_physical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->physical_block_size); > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(dev->queue, dev->max_hw_sectors); > - blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(dev->queue, > - dev->max_write_same_sectors); > > /* > * we don't support discards to "discontiguous" segments > @@ -1610,10 +1607,10 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev *rnbd_clt_map_device(const char *sessname, > } > > rnbd_clt_info(dev, > - "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_write_same_sectors: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > + "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > dev->gd->disk_name, dev->nsectors, > dev->logical_block_size, dev->physical_block_size, > - dev->max_write_same_sectors, dev->max_discard_sectors, > + dev->max_discard_sectors, > dev->discard_granularity, dev->discard_alignment, > dev->secure_discard, dev->max_segments, > dev->max_hw_sectors, dev->rotational, dev->wc, dev->fua); > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > index 0c2cae7f39b9f..6946ba23d62e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev { > bool wc; > bool fua; > u32 max_hw_sectors; > - u32 max_write_same_sectors; > u32 max_discard_sectors; > u32 discard_granularity; > u32 discard_alignment; I am planning to remove more members inside struct rnbd_clt_dev. > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > index de5d5a8df81d7..3eb8b34bd1886 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > @@ -249,9 +249,6 @@ static inline u32 rnbd_to_bio_flags(u32 rnbd_opf) > case RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > bio_opf = REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > break; > - case RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME: > - bio_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME; > - break; > default: > WARN(1, "Unknown RNBD type: %d (flags %d)\n", > rnbd_op(rnbd_opf), rnbd_opf); > @@ -284,9 +281,6 @@ static inline u32 rq_to_rnbd_flags(struct request *rq) > case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > break; > - case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME: > - rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME; > - break; > case REQ_OP_FLUSH: > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_FLUSH; > break; > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > index 132e950685d59..0e6b5687f8321 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp, > cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev)); > rsp->max_hw_sectors = > cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev)); > - rsp->max_write_same_sectors = > - cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev)); > + rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0; IIUC, I think we can delete max_write_same_sectors from rsp as well given the earlier change in setup_request_queue and rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr. Thanks, Guoqing
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:05 AM Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > On 2/9/22 4:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > > even merged. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de> > > --- > > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 7 ++----- > > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h | 1 - > > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h | 6 ------ > > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 3 +-- > > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > > index c08971de369fc..dc192d2738854 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > > @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev, > > dev->nsectors = le64_to_cpu(rsp->nsectors); > > dev->logical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->logical_block_size); > > dev->physical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->physical_block_size); > > - dev->max_write_same_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_write_same_sectors); > > dev->max_discard_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_discard_sectors); > > dev->discard_granularity = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_granularity); > > dev->discard_alignment = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_alignment); > > @@ -1359,8 +1358,6 @@ static void setup_request_queue(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev) > > blk_queue_logical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->logical_block_size); > > blk_queue_physical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->physical_block_size); > > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(dev->queue, dev->max_hw_sectors); > > - blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(dev->queue, > > - dev->max_write_same_sectors); > > > > /* > > * we don't support discards to "discontiguous" segments > > @@ -1610,10 +1607,10 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev *rnbd_clt_map_device(const char *sessname, > > } > > > > rnbd_clt_info(dev, > > - "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_write_same_sectors: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > > + "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > > dev->gd->disk_name, dev->nsectors, > > dev->logical_block_size, dev->physical_block_size, > > - dev->max_write_same_sectors, dev->max_discard_sectors, > > + dev->max_discard_sectors, > > dev->discard_granularity, dev->discard_alignment, > > dev->secure_discard, dev->max_segments, > > dev->max_hw_sectors, dev->rotational, dev->wc, dev->fua); > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > > index 0c2cae7f39b9f..6946ba23d62e5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > > @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev { > > bool wc; > > bool fua; > > u32 max_hw_sectors; > > - u32 max_write_same_sectors; > > u32 max_discard_sectors; > > u32 discard_granularity; > > u32 discard_alignment; > > I am planning to remove more members inside struct rnbd_clt_dev. > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > > index de5d5a8df81d7..3eb8b34bd1886 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > > @@ -249,9 +249,6 @@ static inline u32 rnbd_to_bio_flags(u32 rnbd_opf) > > case RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > > bio_opf = REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > > break; > > - case RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME: > > - bio_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME; > > - break; > > default: > > WARN(1, "Unknown RNBD type: %d (flags %d)\n", > > rnbd_op(rnbd_opf), rnbd_opf); > > @@ -284,9 +281,6 @@ static inline u32 rq_to_rnbd_flags(struct request *rq) > > case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > > break; > > - case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME: > > - rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME; > > - break; > > case REQ_OP_FLUSH: > > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_FLUSH; > > break; > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > > index 132e950685d59..0e6b5687f8321 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > > @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp, > > cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev)); > > rsp->max_hw_sectors = > > cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev)); > > - rsp->max_write_same_sectors = > > - cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev)); > > + rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0; > > IIUC, I think we can delete max_write_same_sectors from rsp as well given > the earlier change in setup_request_queue and rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr. No, I don't think it's a good idea, we need to keep the protocol compatible, so client for old kernel version won't be confused. The patch looks good to me, but I want to run a regression test before give an acked. Thanks! Jinpu > > Thanks, > Guoqing
On 2/9/22 5:13 PM, Jinpu Wang wrote: >>> --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c >>> +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c >>> @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp, >>> cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev)); >>> rsp->max_hw_sectors = >>> cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev)); >>> - rsp->max_write_same_sectors = >>> - cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev)); >>> + rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0; >> IIUC, I think we can delete max_write_same_sectors from rsp as well given >> the earlier change in setup_request_queue and rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr. > No, I don't think it's a good idea, we need to keep the protocol > compatible, so client for old kernel version > won't be confused. Fair enough. Then I guess it is better to add obsolete_ prefix like obsolete_rotational. Thanks, Guoqing
Hi Christoph, On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:28 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > even merged. Do you think if it makes sense to instead of removing REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME, simply convert it to REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES? Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 7 ++----- > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h | 1 - > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h | 6 ------ > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 3 +-- > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > index c08971de369fc..dc192d2738854 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c > @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev, > dev->nsectors = le64_to_cpu(rsp->nsectors); > dev->logical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->logical_block_size); > dev->physical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->physical_block_size); > - dev->max_write_same_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_write_same_sectors); > dev->max_discard_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_discard_sectors); > dev->discard_granularity = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_granularity); > dev->discard_alignment = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_alignment); > @@ -1359,8 +1358,6 @@ static void setup_request_queue(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev) > blk_queue_logical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->logical_block_size); > blk_queue_physical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->physical_block_size); > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(dev->queue, dev->max_hw_sectors); > - blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(dev->queue, > - dev->max_write_same_sectors); > > /* > * we don't support discards to "discontiguous" segments > @@ -1610,10 +1607,10 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev *rnbd_clt_map_device(const char *sessname, > } > > rnbd_clt_info(dev, > - "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_write_same_sectors: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > + "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", > dev->gd->disk_name, dev->nsectors, > dev->logical_block_size, dev->physical_block_size, > - dev->max_write_same_sectors, dev->max_discard_sectors, > + dev->max_discard_sectors, > dev->discard_granularity, dev->discard_alignment, > dev->secure_discard, dev->max_segments, > dev->max_hw_sectors, dev->rotational, dev->wc, dev->fua); > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > index 0c2cae7f39b9f..6946ba23d62e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h > @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev { > bool wc; > bool fua; > u32 max_hw_sectors; > - u32 max_write_same_sectors; > u32 max_discard_sectors; > u32 discard_granularity; > u32 discard_alignment; > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > index de5d5a8df81d7..3eb8b34bd1886 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h > @@ -249,9 +249,6 @@ static inline u32 rnbd_to_bio_flags(u32 rnbd_opf) > case RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > bio_opf = REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > break; > - case RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME: > - bio_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME; > - break; > default: > WARN(1, "Unknown RNBD type: %d (flags %d)\n", > rnbd_op(rnbd_opf), rnbd_opf); > @@ -284,9 +281,6 @@ static inline u32 rq_to_rnbd_flags(struct request *rq) > case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE: > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE; > break; > - case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME: > - rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME; > - break; > case REQ_OP_FLUSH: > rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_FLUSH; > break; > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > index 132e950685d59..0e6b5687f8321 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c > @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp, > cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev)); > rsp->max_hw_sectors = > cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev)); > - rsp->max_write_same_sectors = > - cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev)); > + rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0; > rsp->max_discard_sectors = > cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_discard_sects(rnbd_dev)); > rsp->discard_granularity = > -- > 2.30.2 >
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:28 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > > even merged. > > Do you think if it makes sense to instead of removing > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME, simply convert it to REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES? Well, they have different semantics, so you can't just "convert" it. But it might make sense to add REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:04 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:28 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > > > > > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing > > > code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was > > > even merged. > > > > Do you think if it makes sense to instead of removing > > REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME, simply convert it to REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES? > > Well, they have different semantics, so you can't just "convert" it. > But it might make sense to add REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES. Thanks, we will add support for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES later. For this patch, I've run internal tests, works fine. Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c index c08971de369fc..dc192d2738854 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev, dev->nsectors = le64_to_cpu(rsp->nsectors); dev->logical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->logical_block_size); dev->physical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->physical_block_size); - dev->max_write_same_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_write_same_sectors); dev->max_discard_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_discard_sectors); dev->discard_granularity = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_granularity); dev->discard_alignment = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_alignment); @@ -1359,8 +1358,6 @@ static void setup_request_queue(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev) blk_queue_logical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->logical_block_size); blk_queue_physical_block_size(dev->queue, dev->physical_block_size); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(dev->queue, dev->max_hw_sectors); - blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(dev->queue, - dev->max_write_same_sectors); /* * we don't support discards to "discontiguous" segments @@ -1610,10 +1607,10 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev *rnbd_clt_map_device(const char *sessname, } rnbd_clt_info(dev, - "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_write_same_sectors: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", + "map_device: Device mapped as %s (nsectors: %zu, logical_block_size: %d, physical_block_size: %d, max_discard_sectors: %d, discard_granularity: %d, discard_alignment: %d, secure_discard: %d, max_segments: %d, max_hw_sectors: %d, rotational: %d, wc: %d, fua: %d)\n", dev->gd->disk_name, dev->nsectors, dev->logical_block_size, dev->physical_block_size, - dev->max_write_same_sectors, dev->max_discard_sectors, + dev->max_discard_sectors, dev->discard_granularity, dev->discard_alignment, dev->secure_discard, dev->max_segments, dev->max_hw_sectors, dev->rotational, dev->wc, dev->fua); diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h index 0c2cae7f39b9f..6946ba23d62e5 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ struct rnbd_clt_dev { bool wc; bool fua; u32 max_hw_sectors; - u32 max_write_same_sectors; u32 max_discard_sectors; u32 discard_granularity; u32 discard_alignment; diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h index de5d5a8df81d7..3eb8b34bd1886 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h @@ -249,9 +249,6 @@ static inline u32 rnbd_to_bio_flags(u32 rnbd_opf) case RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE: bio_opf = REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE; break; - case RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME: - bio_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME; - break; default: WARN(1, "Unknown RNBD type: %d (flags %d)\n", rnbd_op(rnbd_opf), rnbd_opf); @@ -284,9 +281,6 @@ static inline u32 rq_to_rnbd_flags(struct request *rq) case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE: rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_SECURE_ERASE; break; - case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME: - rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_WRITE_SAME; - break; case REQ_OP_FLUSH: rnbd_opf = RNBD_OP_FLUSH; break; diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c index 132e950685d59..0e6b5687f8321 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp, cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev)); rsp->max_hw_sectors = cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev)); - rsp->max_write_same_sectors = - cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev)); + rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0; rsp->max_discard_sectors = cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_discard_sects(rnbd_dev)); rsp->discard_granularity =
REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME was only ever submitted by the legacy Linux zeroing code, which has switched to use REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES long before rnbd was even merged. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 7 ++----- drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.h | 1 - drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-proto.h | 6 ------ drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)