diff mbox series

[v2,13/18] uaccess: generalize access_ok()

Message ID 20220216131332.1489939-14-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Feb. 16, 2022, 1:13 p.m. UTC
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.

Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
of uaccess_kernel() sections.

For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.

Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across
architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline
function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of
callers need an extra __user annotation for this.

Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the
addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses
fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the
end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/Kconfig                          |  7 ++++
 arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 34 +++------------
 arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h        | 29 -------------
 arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h        | 20 +--------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 11 ++---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  8 ----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 25 ------------
 arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  5 +--
 arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu                 |  1 +
 arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 19 +--------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h |  8 +---
 arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 29 +------------
 arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h      |  7 +---
 arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 11 +----
 arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h   | 19 +--------
 arch/parisc/Kconfig                   |  1 +
 arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 12 ++----
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 11 +----
 arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 31 +-------------
 arch/s390/Kconfig                     |  1 +
 arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 14 +------
 arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h         | 22 +---------
 arch/sparc/Kconfig                    |  1 +
 arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess.h      |  3 --
 arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h   | 18 ++------
 arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h   | 12 +-----
 arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h         |  5 ++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h        | 14 +------
 arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 10 +----
 include/asm-generic/access_ok.h       | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/asm-generic/uaccess.h         | 21 +---------
 include/linux/uaccess.h               |  7 ----
 32 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 366 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/access_ok.h

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Feb. 17, 2022, 7:52 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:13 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:

> + * limit and catch all possible overflows.
> + * On architectures with separate user address space (m68k, s390, parisc,
> + * sparc64) or those without an MMU, this should always return true.
...
> +static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +       unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
> +       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
> +
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE))
> +               return true;

I noticed that I'm missing the check for !CONFIG_MMU here, despite
mentioning that in the comment above it. I've added it now.

        Arnd
Andy Lutomirski Feb. 17, 2022, 7:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
> architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
> user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
>
> Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
> against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
> of uaccess_kernel() sections.
>
> For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
> check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
> compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
> do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.

This isn't actually optimal.  On x86, TASK_SIZE_MAX is a bizarre
constant that has a very specific value to work around a bug^Wdesign
error^Wfeature of Intel CPUs.  TASK_SIZE_MAX is the maximum address at
which userspace is permitted to allocate memory, but there is a huge
gap between user and kernel addresses, and any value in the gap would
be adequate for the comparison.  If we wanted to optimize this, simply
checking the high bit (which x86 can do without any immediate
constants at all) would be sufficient and, for an access known to fit
in 32 bits, one could get even fancier and completely ignore the size
of the access.  (For accesses not known to fit in 32 bits, I suspect
some creativity could still come up with a construction that's
substantially faster than the one in your patch.)

So there's plenty of room for optimization here.

(This is not in any respect a NAK -- it's just an observation that
this could be even better.)
Christoph Hellwig Feb. 18, 2022, 6:34 a.m. UTC | #3
> +#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>

Instead of the asm-generic games, shouldn't we just define access_ok in
<linux/uaccess.h> if not already defined by the architecture?
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 18, 2022, 7:16 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:15 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
> > architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
> > user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
> >
> > Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
> > against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
> > of uaccess_kernel() sections.
> >
> > For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
> > check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
> > compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
> > do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.
>
> This isn't actually optimal.  On x86, TASK_SIZE_MAX is a bizarre
> constant that has a very specific value to work around a bug^Wdesign
> error^Wfeature of Intel CPUs.  TASK_SIZE_MAX is the maximum address at
> which userspace is permitted to allocate memory, but there is a huge
> gap between user and kernel addresses, and any value in the gap would
> be adequate for the comparison.  If we wanted to optimize this, simply
> checking the high bit (which x86 can do without any immediate
> constants at all) would be sufficient and, for an access known to fit
> in 32 bits, one could get even fancier and completely ignore the size
> of the access.  (For accesses not known to fit in 32 bits, I suspect
> some creativity could still come up with a construction that's
> substantially faster than the one in your patch.)
>
> So there's plenty of room for optimization here.
>
> (This is not in any respect a NAK -- it's just an observation that
> this could be even better.)

Thank you for taking a look!

As you can see in the patch that changes the algorithm on x86 [1],
it was already using TASK_SIZE_MAX as the limit, only the order
in which the comparison is done, hopefully leading to better code
already. I have looked at trivial examples on x86 that showed an
improvement for constant sizes, but only looked at arm64 in detail
for the overall result.

It may be worth checking if using LONG_MAX as the limit produces
better code, but it's probably best to do the optimization in the
common code in a portable way to keep it from diverging again.

       Arnd

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org/
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 18, 2022, 7:23 a.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 7:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> > +#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
>
> Instead of the asm-generic games, shouldn't we just define access_ok in
> <linux/uaccess.h> if not already defined by the architecture?

I tried, but couldn't actually make it work because asm/uaccess.h tends
to contain inline functions that rely on access_ok(). It could work once we
move all the high-level functions into linux/uaccess.h, but that would likely
require another long patch series.

One option that can work is to require architectures to have an
asm/access_ok.h header that gets included by linux/uaccess.h.
On most architectures, that would be redirected to
asm-generic/access_ok.h, as only ia64, x86, arm64 and um
need to override the definition.

      Arnd
Geert Uytterhoeven Feb. 18, 2022, 9:04 a.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:17 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
> architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
> user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
>
> Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
> against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
> of uaccess_kernel() sections.
>
> For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
> check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
> compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
> do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.
>
> Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across
> architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline
> function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of
> callers need an extra __user annotation for this.
>
> Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the
> addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses
> fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the
> end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic]
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

>  arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu                 |  1 +
>  arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 19 +--------

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
David Laight Feb. 18, 2022, 9:30 a.m. UTC | #7
From: Andy Lutomirski
> Sent: 17 February 2022 19:15
...
> This isn't actually optimal.  On x86, TASK_SIZE_MAX is a bizarre
> constant that has a very specific value to work around a bug^Wdesign
> error^Wfeature of Intel CPUs.  TASK_SIZE_MAX is the maximum address at
> which userspace is permitted to allocate memory, but there is a huge
> gap between user and kernel addresses, and any value in the gap would
> be adequate for the comparison.  If we wanted to optimize this, simply
> checking the high bit (which x86 can do without any immediate
> constants at all) would be sufficient and, for an access known to fit
> in 32 bits, one could get even fancier and completely ignore the size
> of the access.  (For accesses not known to fit in 32 bits, I suspect
> some creativity could still come up with a construction that's
> substantially faster than the one in your patch.)
> 
> So there's plenty of room for optimization here.
> 
> (This is not in any respect a NAK -- it's just an observation that
> this could be even better.)

For 64bit arch that use the top bit to separate user/kernel
you can test '(addr | size) >> 62)'.
The compiler optimises out constant sizes.

This has all been mentioned a lot of times.
You do get different fault types.

OTOH an explicit check for constant size (less than something big)
can use the cheaper test of the sign bit.
Big constant sizes could be compile time errors.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Andy Lutomirski Feb. 18, 2022, 6:07 p.m. UTC | #8
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:30 AM David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>
> From: Andy Lutomirski
> > Sent: 17 February 2022 19:15
> ...
> > This isn't actually optimal.  On x86, TASK_SIZE_MAX is a bizarre
> > constant that has a very specific value to work around a bug^Wdesign
> > error^Wfeature of Intel CPUs.  TASK_SIZE_MAX is the maximum address at
> > which userspace is permitted to allocate memory, but there is a huge
> > gap between user and kernel addresses, and any value in the gap would
> > be adequate for the comparison.  If we wanted to optimize this, simply
> > checking the high bit (which x86 can do without any immediate
> > constants at all) would be sufficient and, for an access known to fit
> > in 32 bits, one could get even fancier and completely ignore the size
> > of the access.  (For accesses not known to fit in 32 bits, I suspect
> > some creativity could still come up with a construction that's
> > substantially faster than the one in your patch.)
> >
> > So there's plenty of room for optimization here.
> >
> > (This is not in any respect a NAK -- it's just an observation that
> > this could be even better.)
>
> For 64bit arch that use the top bit to separate user/kernel
> you can test '(addr | size) >> 62)'.
> The compiler optimises out constant sizes.
>
> This has all been mentioned a lot of times.
> You do get different fault types.
>
> OTOH an explicit check for constant size (less than something big)
> can use the cheaper test of the sign bit.
> Big constant sizes could be compile time errors.

The different fault type issue may well be a real problem.  Right now
the core x86 fault code reserves the right to grouch if we get #GP
instead of #PF.  We could change that.
Stafford Horne Feb. 24, 2022, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #9
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 02:13:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
> architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
> user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
> 
> Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
> against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
> of uaccess_kernel() sections.
> 
> For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
> check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
> compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
> do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.
> 
> Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across
> architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline
> function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of
> callers need an extra __user annotation for this.
> 
> Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the
> addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses
> fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the
> end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic]
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
...
>  arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h   | 19 +--------
...
>  include/asm-generic/access_ok.h       | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/uaccess.h         | 21 +---------
>  include/linux/uaccess.h               |  7 ----
>  32 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 366 deletions(-)
> 
...
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 120f5005461b..8f049ec99b3e 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -45,21 +45,7 @@
>  
>  #define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs() == KERNEL_DS)
>  
> -/* Ensure that the range from addr to addr+size is all within the process'
> - * address space
> - */
> -static inline int __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> -{
> -	const mm_segment_t fs = get_fs();
> -
> -	return size <= fs && addr <= (fs - size);
> -}
> -
> -#define access_ok(addr, size)						\
> -({ 									\
> -	__chk_user_ptr(addr);						\
> -	__range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size));			\
> -})
> +#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>

I was going to ask why we are missing __chk_user_ptr in the generic version.
But this is basically now a no-op so I think its OK.

>  /*
>   * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
> @@ -268,9 +254,6 @@ clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
>  	return size;
>  }
>  
> -#define user_addr_max() \
> -	(uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
> -
>  extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
>  
>  extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);

...
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h b/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1aad8964d2ed
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_ACCESS_OK_H__
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_ACCESS_OK_H__
> +
> +/*
> + * Checking whether a pointer is valid for user space access.
> + * These definitions work on most architectures, but overrides can
> + * be used where necessary.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * architectures with compat tasks have a variable TASK_SIZE and should
> + * override this to a constant.
> + */
> +#ifndef TASK_SIZE_MAX
> +#define TASK_SIZE_MAX			TASK_SIZE
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef uaccess_kernel
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SET_FS
> +#define uaccess_kernel()		(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
> +#else
> +#define uaccess_kernel()		(0)
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef user_addr_max
> +#define user_addr_max()			(uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE_MAX)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __access_ok
> +/*
> + * 'size' is a compile-time constant for most callers, so optimize for
> + * this case to turn the check into a single comparison against a constant
> + * limit and catch all possible overflows.
> + * On architectures with separate user address space (m68k, s390, parisc,
> + * sparc64) or those without an MMU, this should always return true.
> + *
> + * This version was originally contributed by Jonas Bonn for the
> + * OpenRISC architecture, and was found to be the most efficient
> + * for constant 'size' and 'limit' values.
> + */
> +static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
> +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef access_ok
> +#define access_ok(addr, size) likely(__access_ok(addr, size))
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h b/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
> index 0870fa11a7c5..ebc685dc8d74 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
> @@ -114,28 +114,9 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifndef uaccess_kernel
> -#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
> -#endif
> -
> -#ifndef user_addr_max
> -#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
> -#endif
> -
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SET_FS */
>  
> -#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr),(size))
> -
> -/*
> - * The architecture should really override this if possible, at least
> - * doing a check on the get_fs()
> - */
> -#ifndef __access_ok
> -static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> -{
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -#endif
> +#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index 67e9bc94dc40..2c31667e62e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -33,13 +33,6 @@ typedef struct {
>  	/* empty dummy */
>  } mm_segment_t;
>  
> -#ifndef TASK_SIZE_MAX
> -#define TASK_SIZE_MAX			TASK_SIZE
> -#endif
> -
> -#define uaccess_kernel()		(false)
> -#define user_addr_max()			(TASK_SIZE_MAX)
> -
>  static inline mm_segment_t force_uaccess_begin(void)
>  {
>  	return (mm_segment_t) { };


Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> [openrisc, asm-generic]

Thanks!
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 24, 2022, 8:41 a.m. UTC | #10
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:29 AM Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> wrote:

> > -
> > -#define access_ok(addr, size)                                                \
> > -({                                                                   \
> > -     __chk_user_ptr(addr);                                           \
> > -     __range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size));                      \
> > -})
> > +#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
>
> I was going to ask why we are missing __chk_user_ptr in the generic version.
> But this is basically now a no-op so I think its OK.

Correct, the type checking is implied by making __access_ok() an inline
function that takes a __user pointer.

> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> [openrisc, asm-generic]

Thanks!

       Arnd
Dinh Nguyen Feb. 25, 2022, 4:31 a.m. UTC | #11
On 2/16/22 07:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across
> architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the
> user_addr_max() value or they accept anything.
> 
> Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking
> against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside
> of uaccess_kernel() sections.
> 
> For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest
> check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a
> compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to
> do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong.
> 
> Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across
> architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline
> function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of
> callers need an extra __user annotation for this.
> 
> Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the
> addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses
> fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the
> end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic]
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>   arch/Kconfig                          |  7 ++++
>   arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 34 +++------------
>   arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h        | 29 -------------
>   arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h        | 20 +--------
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 11 ++---
>   arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  8 ----
>   arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 25 ------------
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  5 +--
>   arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu                 |  1 +
>   arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 19 +--------
>   arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h |  8 +---
>   arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h       | 29 +------------
>   arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h      |  7 +---
>   arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h      | 11 +----

Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 678a80713b21..fa5db36bda67 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -898,6 +898,13 @@  config HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK
 	  Architecture provides a function to run __do_softirq() on a
 	  separate stack.
 
+config ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE
+	bool
+	help
+	  Architectures set this when the CPU uses separate address
+	  spaces for kernel and user space pointers. In this case, the
+	  access_ok() check on a __user pointer is skipped.
+
 config PGTABLE_LEVELS
 	int
 	default 2
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 1b6f25efa247..82c5743fc9cd 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -20,28 +20,7 @@ 
 #define get_fs()  (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
 #define set_fs(x) (current_thread_info()->addr_limit = (x))
 
-#define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-
-/*
- * Is a address valid? This does a straightforward calculation rather
- * than tests.
- *
- * Address valid if:
- *  - "addr" doesn't have any high-bits set
- *  - AND "size" doesn't have any high-bits set
- *  - AND "addr+size-(size != 0)" doesn't have any high-bits set
- *  - OR we are in kernel mode.
- */
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) ({				\
-	unsigned long __ao_a = (addr), __ao_b = (size);		\
-	unsigned long __ao_end = __ao_a + __ao_b - !!__ao_b;	\
-	(get_fs().seg & (__ao_a | __ao_b | __ao_end)) == 0; })
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)				\
-({							\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);				\
-	__access_ok(((unsigned long)(addr)), (size));	\
-})
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
@@ -105,7 +84,7 @@  extern void __get_user_unknown(void);
 	long __gu_err = -EFAULT;				\
 	unsigned long __gu_val = 0;				\
 	const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
-	if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__gu_addr, size)) {	\
+	if (__access_ok(__gu_addr, size)) {			\
 		__gu_err = 0;					\
 		switch (size) {					\
 		  case 1: __get_user_8(__gu_addr); break;	\
@@ -200,7 +179,7 @@  extern void __put_user_unknown(void);
 ({								\
 	long __pu_err = -EFAULT;				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr);		\
-	if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__pu_addr, size)) {	\
+	if (__access_ok(__pu_addr, size)) {			\
 		__pu_err = 0;					\
 		switch (size) {					\
 		  case 1: __put_user_8(x, __pu_addr); break;	\
@@ -316,17 +295,14 @@  raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long len)
 
 extern long __clear_user(void __user *to, long len);
 
-extern inline long
+static inline long
 clear_user(void __user *to, long len)
 {
-	if (__access_ok((unsigned long)to, len))
+	if (__access_ok(to, len))
 		len = __clear_user(to, len);
 	return len;
 }
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-        (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-
 extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
 extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);
 
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 783bfdb3bfa3..30f80b4be2ab 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -23,35 +23,6 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/string.h>	/* for generic string functions */
 
-
-#define __kernel_ok		(uaccess_kernel())
-
-/*
- * Algorithmically, for __user_ok() we want do:
- * 	(start < TASK_SIZE) && (start+len < TASK_SIZE)
- * where TASK_SIZE could either be retrieved from thread_info->addr_limit or
- * emitted directly in code.
- *
- * This can however be rewritten as follows:
- *	(len <= TASK_SIZE) && (start+len < TASK_SIZE)
- *
- * Because it essentially checks if buffer end is within limit and @len is
- * non-ngeative, which implies that buffer start will be within limit too.
- *
- * The reason for rewriting being, for majority of cases, @len is generally
- * compile time constant, causing first sub-expression to be compile time
- * subsumed.
- *
- * The second part would generate weird large LIMMs e.g. (0x6000_0000 - 0x10),
- * so we check for TASK_SIZE using get_fs() since the addr_limit load from mem
- * would already have been done at this call site for __kernel_ok()
- *
- */
-#define __user_ok(addr, sz)	(((sz) <= TASK_SIZE) && \
-				 ((addr) <= (get_fs() - (sz))))
-#define __access_ok(addr, sz)	(unlikely(__kernel_ok) || \
-				 likely(__user_ok((addr), (sz))))
-
 /*********** Single byte/hword/word copies ******************/
 
 #define __get_user_fn(sz, u, k)					\
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d20d78c34b94..2fcbec9c306c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -55,21 +55,6 @@  extern int __put_user_bad(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 
-/*
- * We use 33-bit arithmetic here.  Success returns zero, failure returns
- * addr_limit.  We take advantage that addr_limit will be zero for KERNEL_DS,
- * so this will always return success in that case.
- */
-#define __range_ok(addr, size) ({ \
-	unsigned long flag, roksum; \
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);	\
-	__asm__(".syntax unified\n" \
-		"adds %1, %2, %3; sbcscc %1, %1, %0; movcc %0, #0" \
-		: "=&r" (flag), "=&r" (roksum) \
-		: "r" (addr), "Ir" (size), "0" (TASK_SIZE) \
-		: "cc"); \
-	flag; })
-
 /*
  * This is a type: either unsigned long, if the argument fits into
  * that type, or otherwise unsigned long long.
@@ -241,15 +226,12 @@  extern int __put_user_8(void *, unsigned long long);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_MMU */
 
-#define __addr_ok(addr)		((void)(addr), 1)
-#define __range_ok(addr, size)	((void)(addr), 0)
-
 #define get_user(x, p)	__get_user(x, p)
 #define __put_user_check __put_user_nocheck
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
 
-#define access_ok(addr, size)	(__range_ok(addr, size) == 0)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SPECTRE
 /*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 199c553b740a..e8dce0cc5eaa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -26,13 +26,7 @@ 
 #include <asm/memory.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
 
-static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
-	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
+static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size);
 
 /*
  * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
@@ -54,6 +48,9 @@  static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
 
 	return likely(__access_ok(addr, size));
 }
+#define access_ok access_ok
+
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * User access enabling/disabling.
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ac5a54f57d40..fec8f77ffc99 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -5,14 +5,6 @@ 
 
 #define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
-#define __access_ok __access_ok
-
 /*
  * __put_user_fn
  */
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 719ba3f3c45c..bff77efc0d9a 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -12,31 +12,6 @@ 
  */
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 
-/*
- * access_ok: - Checks if a user space pointer is valid
- * @addr: User space pointer to start of block to check
- * @size: Size of block to check
- *
- * Context: User context only. This function may sleep if pagefaults are
- *          enabled.
- *
- * Checks if a pointer to a block of memory in user space is valid.
- *
- * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
- * if it is definitely invalid.
- *
- */
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
-#define __access_ok __access_ok
-
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
  * address is checked against a table of exception_table_entries.
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index e19d2dcc0ced..e242a3cc1330 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -50,8 +50,6 @@ 
 #define get_fs()  (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
 #define set_fs(x) (current_thread_info()->addr_limit = (x))
 
-#define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-
 /*
  * When accessing user memory, we need to make sure the entire area really is in
  * user-level space.  In order to do this efficiently, we make sure that the page at
@@ -65,7 +63,8 @@  static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *p, unsigned long size)
 	return likely(addr <= seg) &&
 	 (seg == KERNEL_DS.seg || likely(REGION_OFFSET(addr) < RGN_MAP_LIMIT));
 }
-#define access_ok(addr, size)	__access_ok((addr), (size))
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
index 0d00ef5117dc..16ea9a67723c 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@  config CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED
 
 config CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
 	bool
+	select ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE
 
 config FPU
 	bool
diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 8eb625e75452..64914872a5c9 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -10,24 +10,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
-
-/* We let the MMU do all checking */
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *ptr,
-			    unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
-	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
-
-	/*
-	 * XXX: for !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES this really needs to check
-	 * for TASK_SIZE!
-	 * Removing this helper is probably sufficient.
-	 */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES))
-		return 1;
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * Not all varients of the 68k family support the notion of address spaces.
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 3fe96979d2c6..bf9b7657a65a 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,13 +39,7 @@ 
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d7c89dc3426c..436248652b28 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -44,34 +44,7 @@  extern u64 __ua_limit;
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
 
-/*
- * access_ok: - Checks if a user space pointer is valid
- * @addr: User space pointer to start of block to check
- * @size: Size of block to check
- *
- * Context: User context only. This function may sleep if pagefaults are
- *          enabled.
- *
- * Checks if a pointer to a block of memory in user space is valid.
- *
- * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block may be valid, false (zero)
- * if it is definitely invalid.
- *
- * Note that, depending on architecture, this function probably just
- * checks that the pointer is in the user space range - after calling
- * this function, memory access functions may still return -EFAULT.
- */
-
-static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *p, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p;
-	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)					\
-	likely(__access_ok((addr), (size)))
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * put_user: - Write a simple value into user space.
diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 37a40981deb3..832d642a4068 100644
--- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -38,18 +38,15 @@  extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 #define get_fs()	(current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
 #define user_addr_max	get_fs
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs() == KERNEL_DS)
 
 static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
 {
 	current_thread_info()->addr_limit = fs;
 }
 
-#define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs() == KERNEL_DS)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
-#define __range_ok(addr, size) (size <= get_fs() && addr <= (get_fs() -size))
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)	\
-	__range_ok((unsigned long)addr, (unsigned long)size)
 /*
  * Single-value transfer routines.  They automatically use the right
  * size if we just have the right pointer type.  Note that the functions
diff --git a/arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a5cbe07cf0da..6664ddc0e8e5 100644
--- a/arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/nios2/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -30,19 +30,10 @@ 
 #define get_fs()		(current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
 #define set_fs(seg)		(current_thread_info()->addr_limit = (seg))
 
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-
-#define __access_ok(addr, len)			\
-	(((signed long)(((long)get_fs().seg) &	\
-		((long)(addr) | (((long)(addr)) + (len)) | (len)))) == 0)
-
-#define access_ok(addr, len)		\
-	likely(__access_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (unsigned long)(len)))
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
 
-#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-
 /*
  * Zero Userspace
  */
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 120f5005461b..8f049ec99b3e 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -45,21 +45,7 @@ 
 
 #define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs() == KERNEL_DS)
 
-/* Ensure that the range from addr to addr+size is all within the process'
- * address space
- */
-static inline int __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	const mm_segment_t fs = get_fs();
-
-	return size <= fs && addr <= (fs - size);
-}
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)						\
-({ 									\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);						\
-	__range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size));			\
-})
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
@@ -268,9 +254,6 @@  clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
 	return size;
 }
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-
 extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
 
 extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);
diff --git a/arch/parisc/Kconfig b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
index 43c1c880def6..15039fdd5413 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/parisc/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 config PARISC
 	def_bool y
+	select ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	select ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T if !64BIT
 	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
 	select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 0925bbd6db67..187f4bdff13e 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -11,15 +11,9 @@ 
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 
-/*
- * Note that since kernel addresses are in a separate address space on
- * parisc, we don't need to do anything for access_ok().
- * We just let the page fault handler do the right thing. This also means
- * that put_user is the same as __put_user, etc.
- */
-
-#define access_ok(uaddr, size)	\
-	( (uaddr) == (uaddr) )
+#define TASK_SIZE_MAX DEFAULT_TASK_SIZE
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 #define put_user __put_user
 #define get_user __get_user
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a0032c2e7550..2e83217f52de 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -11,18 +11,9 @@ 
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 /* We use TASK_SIZE_USER64 as TASK_SIZE is not constant */
 #define TASK_SIZE_MAX		TASK_SIZE_USER64
-#else
-#define TASK_SIZE_MAX		TASK_SIZE
 #endif
 
-static inline bool __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return addr < TASK_SIZE_MAX && size <= TASK_SIZE_MAX - addr;
-}
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)		\
-	(__chk_user_ptr(addr),		\
-	 __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size)))
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 4407b9e48d2c..855450bed9f5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -21,42 +21,13 @@ 
 #include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
 #include <asm/asm.h>
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 #define __enable_user_access()							\
 	__asm__ __volatile__ ("csrs sstatus, %0" : : "r" (SR_SUM) : "memory")
 #define __disable_user_access()							\
 	__asm__ __volatile__ ("csrc sstatus, %0" : : "r" (SR_SUM) : "memory")
 
-/**
- * access_ok: - Checks if a user space pointer is valid
- * @addr: User space pointer to start of block to check
- * @size: Size of block to check
- *
- * Context: User context only.  This function may sleep.
- *
- * Checks if a pointer to a block of memory in user space is valid.
- *
- * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block may be valid, false (zero)
- * if it is definitely invalid.
- *
- * Note that, depending on architecture, this function probably just
- * checks that the pointer is in the user space range - after calling
- * this function, memory access functions may still return -EFAULT.
- */
-#define access_ok(addr, size) ({					\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);						\
-	likely(__access_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), (size)));	\
-})
-
-/*
- * Ensure that the range [addr, addr+size) is within the process's
- * address space
- */
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return size <= TASK_SIZE && addr <= TASK_SIZE - size;
-}
-
 /*
  * The exception table consists of pairs of addresses: the first is the
  * address of an instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index be9f39fd06df..fb48a62aa985 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@  config S390
 	# Note: keep this list sorted alphabetically
 	#
 	imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
+	select ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	select ARCH_32BIT_USTAT_F_TINODE
 	select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE
 	select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG if SPARSEMEM
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 29332edf46f0..5cb258cd9d29 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -17,22 +17,10 @@ 
 #include <asm/ctl_reg.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
 #include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 void debug_user_asce(int exit);
 
-static inline int __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
-#define __access_ok(addr, size)				\
-({							\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);				\
-	__range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size));	\
-})
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok(addr, size)
-
 unsigned long __must_check
 raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
 
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 8867bb04b00e..ccd219d74851 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -5,28 +5,10 @@ 
 #include <asm/segment.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
 
-#define __addr_ok(addr) \
-	((unsigned long __force)(addr) < current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
-
-/*
- * __access_ok: Check if address with size is OK or not.
- *
- * Uhhuh, this needs 33-bit arithmetic. We have a carry..
- *
- * sum := addr + size;  carry? --> flag = true;
- * if (sum >= addr_limit) flag = true;
- */
-#define __access_ok(addr, size)	({				\
-	unsigned long __ao_a = (addr), __ao_b = (size);		\
-	unsigned long __ao_end = __ao_a + __ao_b - !!__ao_b;	\
-	__ao_end >= __ao_a && __addr_ok(__ao_end); })
-
-#define access_ok(addr, size)	\
-	(__chk_user_ptr(addr),		\
-	 __access_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), (size)))
-
 #define user_addr_max()	(current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
+
 /*
  * Uh, these should become the main single-value transfer routines ...
  * They automatically use the right size if we just have the right
diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index 1cab1b284f1a..9f6f9bce5292 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@  config SPARC32
 
 config SPARC64
 	def_bool 64BIT
+	select ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
 	select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 390094200fc4..ee75f69e3fcd 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ 
 #include <asm/uaccess_32.h>
 #endif
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-
 long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
index 4a12346bb69c..367747116260 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -25,17 +25,7 @@ 
 #define get_fs()	(current->thread.current_ds)
 #define set_fs(val)	((current->thread.current_ds) = (val))
 
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-
-/* We have there a nice not-mapped page at PAGE_OFFSET - PAGE_SIZE, so that this test
- * can be fairly lightweight.
- * No one can read/write anything from userland in the kernel space by setting
- * large size and address near to PAGE_OFFSET - a fault will break his intentions.
- */
-#define __user_ok(addr, size) ({ (void)(size); (addr) < STACK_TOP; })
-#define __kernel_ok (uaccess_kernel())
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) (__user_ok((addr) & get_fs().seg, (size)))
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr), size)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /* Uh, these should become the main single-value transfer routines..
  * They automatically use the right size if we just have the right
@@ -47,13 +37,13 @@ 
  * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  */
 #define put_user(x, ptr) ({ \
-	unsigned long __pu_addr = (unsigned long)(ptr); \
+	void __user *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
 	__put_user_check((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), __pu_addr, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
 })
 
 #define get_user(x, ptr) ({ \
-	unsigned long __gu_addr = (unsigned long)(ptr); \
+	const void __user *__gu_addr = (ptr); \
 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
 	__get_user_check((x), __gu_addr, sizeof(*(ptr)), __typeof__(*(ptr))); \
 })
@@ -232,7 +222,7 @@  static inline unsigned long __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
 
 static inline unsigned long clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
 {
-	if (n && __access_ok((unsigned long) addr, n))
+	if (n && __access_ok(addr, n))
 		return __clear_user(addr, n);
 	else
 		return n;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 5c12fb46bc61..59b9a545df23 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ 
 
 #define get_fs() ((mm_segment_t){(current_thread_info()->current_ds)})
 
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 #define set_fs(val)								\
 do {										\
@@ -61,16 +61,6 @@  static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
 	__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size, limit); \
 })
 
-static inline int __access_ok(const void __user * addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user * addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
 void __retl_efault(void);
 
 /* Uh, these should become the main single-value transfer routines..
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 1ecfc96bcc50..7d9d60e41e4e 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ 
 extern unsigned long raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
 extern unsigned long raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
 extern unsigned long __clear_user(void __user *mem, unsigned long len);
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
+static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size);
 
 /* Teach asm-generic/uaccess.h that we have C functions for these. */
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
@@ -36,8 +36,9 @@  static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
 
 #include <asm-generic/uaccess.h>
 
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
 {
+	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
 	return __addr_range_nowrap(addr, size) &&
 		(__under_task_size(addr, size) ||
 		 __access_ok_vsyscall(addr, size));
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 201efcec66b7..f78e2b3501a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -12,18 +12,6 @@ 
 #include <asm/smap.h>
 #include <asm/extable.h>
 
-/*
- * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
- * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise.
- */
-static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
-	unsigned long addr = ptr;
-
-	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
 # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ()	\
@@ -55,6 +43,8 @@  static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
 	likely(__access_ok(addr, size));				\
 })
 
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
+
 extern int __get_user_1(void);
 extern int __get_user_2(void);
 extern int __get_user_4(void);
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 75bd8fbf52ba..0edd9e4b23d0 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -35,15 +35,7 @@ 
 #define get_fs()	(current->thread.current_ds)
 #define set_fs(val)	(current->thread.current_ds = (val))
 
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-
-#define __kernel_ok (uaccess_kernel())
-#define __user_ok(addr, size) \
-		(((size) <= TASK_SIZE)&&((addr) <= TASK_SIZE-(size)))
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) (__kernel_ok || __user_ok((addr), (size)))
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr), (size))
-
-#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h b/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1aad8964d2ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_ACCESS_OK_H__
+#define __ASM_GENERIC_ACCESS_OK_H__
+
+/*
+ * Checking whether a pointer is valid for user space access.
+ * These definitions work on most architectures, but overrides can
+ * be used where necessary.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * architectures with compat tasks have a variable TASK_SIZE and should
+ * override this to a constant.
+ */
+#ifndef TASK_SIZE_MAX
+#define TASK_SIZE_MAX			TASK_SIZE
+#endif
+
+#ifndef uaccess_kernel
+#ifdef CONFIG_SET_FS
+#define uaccess_kernel()		(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#else
+#define uaccess_kernel()		(0)
+#endif
+#endif
+
+#ifndef user_addr_max
+#define user_addr_max()			(uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE_MAX)
+#endif
+
+#ifndef __access_ok
+/*
+ * 'size' is a compile-time constant for most callers, so optimize for
+ * this case to turn the check into a single comparison against a constant
+ * limit and catch all possible overflows.
+ * On architectures with separate user address space (m68k, s390, parisc,
+ * sparc64) or those without an MMU, this should always return true.
+ *
+ * This version was originally contributed by Jonas Bonn for the
+ * OpenRISC architecture, and was found to be the most efficient
+ * for constant 'size' and 'limit' values.
+ */
+static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
+	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)ptr;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE))
+		return true;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifndef access_ok
+#define access_ok(addr, size) likely(__access_ok(addr, size))
+#endif
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h b/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
index 0870fa11a7c5..ebc685dc8d74 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/uaccess.h
@@ -114,28 +114,9 @@  static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifndef uaccess_kernel
-#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
-#endif
-
-#ifndef user_addr_max
-#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
-#endif
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_SET_FS */
 
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr),(size))
-
-/*
- * The architecture should really override this if possible, at least
- * doing a check on the get_fs()
- */
-#ifndef __access_ok
-static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-#endif
+#include <asm-generic/access_ok.h>
 
 /*
  * These are the main single-value transfer routines.  They automatically
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index 67e9bc94dc40..2c31667e62e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -33,13 +33,6 @@  typedef struct {
 	/* empty dummy */
 } mm_segment_t;
 
-#ifndef TASK_SIZE_MAX
-#define TASK_SIZE_MAX			TASK_SIZE
-#endif
-
-#define uaccess_kernel()		(false)
-#define user_addr_max()			(TASK_SIZE_MAX)
-
 static inline mm_segment_t force_uaccess_begin(void)
 {
 	return (mm_segment_t) { };