diff mbox series

[v2,7/8] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add the two DMA nodes

Message ID 20220222103437.194779-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series RZN1 DMA support | expand

Commit Message

Miquel Raynal Feb. 22, 2022, 10:34 a.m. UTC
Describe the two DMA controllers available on this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven Feb. 23, 2022, 12:54 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Miquel,

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:35 AM Miquel Raynal
<miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Describe the two DMA controllers available on this SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> @@ -184,6 +184,36 @@ nand_controller: nand-controller@40102000 {
>                         status = "disabled";
>                 };
>
> +               dma0: dma-controller@40104000 {
> +                       compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-dma", "renesas,rzn1-dma";
> +                       reg = <0x40104000 0x1000>;
> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                       clock-names = "hclk";
> +                       clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_DMA0>;

power-domains?

> +                       dma-channels = <8>;
> +                       dma-requests = <16>;
> +                       dma-masters = <1>;
> +                       #dma-cells = <3>;

<4>? The dmamux bindings say:

+      The first four cells are dedicated to the master DMA
controller. The fifth
+      cell gives the DMA mux bit index that must be set starting from 0. The
+      sixth cell gives the binary value that must be written there, ie. 0 or 1.

> +                       block_size = <0xfff>;
> +                       data_width = <3>;
> +                       status = "disabled";
> +               };

The rest LGTM.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Miquel Raynal Feb. 23, 2022, 5:14 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Geert,

geert@linux-m68k.org wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:54:20 +0100:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:35 AM Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Describe the two DMA controllers available on this SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> > @@ -184,6 +184,36 @@ nand_controller: nand-controller@40102000 {
> >                         status = "disabled";
> >                 };
> >
> > +               dma0: dma-controller@40104000 {
> > +                       compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-dma", "renesas,rzn1-dma";
> > +                       reg = <0x40104000 0x1000>;
> > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                       clock-names = "hclk";
> > +                       clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_DMA0>;  
> 
> power-domains?
> 
> > +                       dma-channels = <8>;
> > +                       dma-requests = <16>;
> > +                       dma-masters = <1>;
> > +                       #dma-cells = <3>;  
> 
> <4>? The dmamux bindings say:
> 
> +      The first four cells are dedicated to the master DMA
> controller. The fifth
> +      cell gives the DMA mux bit index that must be set starting from 0. The
> +      sixth cell gives the binary value that must be written there, ie. 0 or 1.

The DMAC bindings had initially 3 cells, and then received a fourth
optional one. We do not need it here, that's why I'm keeping #dma-cells
to 3.

But on the mux side, I don't want to deal with the presence or absence
of the optional cell so I assumed we would always request 4 cells for
the DMAC to be on the safe side.

Is this assumption wrong?

Thanks,
Miquèl
Geert Uytterhoeven Feb. 24, 2022, 9:17 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Miquel,

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:14 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> geert@linux-m68k.org wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:54:20 +0100:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:35 AM Miquel Raynal
> > <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > Describe the two DMA controllers available on this SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
> > > @@ -184,6 +184,36 @@ nand_controller: nand-controller@40102000 {
> > >                         status = "disabled";
> > >                 };
> > >
> > > +               dma0: dma-controller@40104000 {
> > > +                       compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-dma", "renesas,rzn1-dma";
> > > +                       reg = <0x40104000 0x1000>;
> > > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > +                       clock-names = "hclk";
> > > +                       clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_DMA0>;
> >
> > power-domains?
> >
> > > +                       dma-channels = <8>;
> > > +                       dma-requests = <16>;
> > > +                       dma-masters = <1>;
> > > +                       #dma-cells = <3>;
> >
> > <4>? The dmamux bindings say:
> >
> > +      The first four cells are dedicated to the master DMA
> > controller. The fifth
> > +      cell gives the DMA mux bit index that must be set starting from 0. The
> > +      sixth cell gives the binary value that must be written there, ie. 0 or 1.
>
> The DMAC bindings had initially 3 cells, and then received a fourth
> optional one. We do not need it here, that's why I'm keeping #dma-cells
> to 3.
>
> But on the mux side, I don't want to deal with the presence or absence
> of the optional cell so I assumed we would always request 4 cells for
> the DMAC to be on the safe side.
>
> Is this assumption wrong?

OK.

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
index db657224688a..640c3eb4bbcd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi
@@ -184,6 +184,36 @@  nand_controller: nand-controller@40102000 {
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		dma0: dma-controller@40104000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-dma", "renesas,rzn1-dma";
+			reg = <0x40104000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clock-names = "hclk";
+			clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_DMA0>;
+			dma-channels = <8>;
+			dma-requests = <16>;
+			dma-masters = <1>;
+			#dma-cells = <3>;
+			block_size = <0xfff>;
+			data_width = <3>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		dma1: dma-controller@40105000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-dma", "renesas,rzn1-dma";
+			reg = <0x40105000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 57 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clock-names = "hclk";
+			clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_DMA1>;
+			dma-channels = <8>;
+			dma-requests = <16>;
+			dma-masters = <1>;
+			#dma-cells = <3>;
+			block_size = <0xfff>;
+			data_width = <3>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
 		gic: interrupt-controller@44101000 {
 			compatible = "arm,gic-400", "arm,cortex-a7-gic";
 			interrupt-controller;