diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] net: Enlarge offset check value from 0xffff to 0x7fffffff in bpf_skb_load_bytes

Message ID 20220318011245.43678-1-liujian56@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] net: Enlarge offset check value from 0xffff to 0x7fffffff in bpf_skb_load_bytes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 25 this patch: 25
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 12 of 12 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 18 this patch: 18
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 30 this patch: 30
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary

Commit Message

Liu Jian March 18, 2022, 1:12 a.m. UTC
The data length of skb frags + frag_list may be greater than 0xffff,
and skb_header_pointer can not handle negative offset and negative len.
So here 0x7ffffff is used to check the validity of offset and len.

Fixes: 05c74e5e53f6 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_load_bytes helper")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
---
v1->v2: sorry for this, change 0x7ffffffff to 0x7fffffff
 net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Daniel Borkmann March 18, 2022, 1:48 p.m. UTC | #1
On 3/18/22 2:12 AM, Liu Jian wrote:
> The data length of skb frags + frag_list may be greater than 0xffff,
> and skb_header_pointer can not handle negative offset and negative len.
> So here 0x7ffffff is used to check the validity of offset and len.
> 
> Fixes: 05c74e5e53f6 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_load_bytes helper")
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: sorry for this, change 0x7ffffffff to 0x7fffffff
>   net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 9eb785842258..17865b896f7d 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_load_bytes, const struct sk_buff *, skb, u32, offset,
>   {
>   	void *ptr;
>   
> -	if (unlikely(offset > 0xffff))
> +	if (unlikely(offset > 0x7fffffff || len > 0x7fffffff))
>   		goto err_clear;

What are those magic numbers (and why not < 0 check)? Also, it's ugly you're adding
these for skb_load_bytes but not skb_store_bytes, both are used in combination from
tc BPF side. Can we come up with something better that works for both?

Given you had to change this between v1 -> v2 from 0x7ffffffff to 0x7fffffff, please
also add BPF selftests with corner cases so this gets properly tested.

>   	ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, offset, len, to);
> 

Thanks,
Daniel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 9eb785842258..17865b896f7d 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@  BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_load_bytes, const struct sk_buff *, skb, u32, offset,
 {
 	void *ptr;
 
-	if (unlikely(offset > 0xffff))
+	if (unlikely(offset > 0x7fffffff || len > 0x7fffffff))
 		goto err_clear;
 
 	ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, offset, len, to);