Message ID | 20220407085946.744568-16-christian.koenig@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [01/15] dma-buf: add enum dma_resv_usage v4 | expand |
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of > seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> > Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah I don't think we'll ever need this again, ww_mutex aren't common and the ww_mutex+seqlock thing wasn't the brighest idea. Peter/Ingo, assuming you agree, can you ack this for merging through drm-misc, or want to pick this up later on when the last user disappeared in Linus' tree? Cheers, Daniel > --- > include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h > index 37ded6b8fee6..3926e9027947 100644 > --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h > +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ > #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h> > #include <linux/lockdep.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > -#include <linux/ww_mutex.h> > #include <linux/preempt.h> > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > > @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) > * static initializer or init function. This enables lockdep to validate > * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. > * > - * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock, mutex, or ww_mutex. > + * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock or mutex > */ > > /* > @@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) > #define seqcount_spinlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, spinlock) > #define seqcount_rwlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, rwlock) > #define seqcount_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, mutex) > -#define seqcount_ww_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, ww_mutex) > > /* > * SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers > @@ -277,7 +275,6 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(raw_spinlock, raw_spinlock_t, false, s->lock, raw_s > SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(spinlock, spinlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, spin, spin_lock(s->lock)) > SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(rwlock, rwlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, read, read_lock(s->lock)) > SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) > -SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mutex, ww_mutex_lock(s->lock, NULL)) > > /* > * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t > @@ -304,8 +301,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu > __seqprop_case((s), raw_spinlock, prop), \ > __seqprop_case((s), spinlock, prop), \ > __seqprop_case((s), rwlock, prop), \ > - __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop), \ > - __seqprop_case((s), ww_mutex, prop)) > + __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop)) > > #define seqprop_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr) > #define seqprop_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence) > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of > seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Am 07.04.22 um 11:19 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of >> seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> >> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> >> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Yeah I don't think we'll ever need this again, ww_mutex aren't common and > the ww_mutex+seqlock thing wasn't the brighest idea. > > Peter/Ingo, assuming you agree, can you ack this for merging through > drm-misc, or want to pick this up later on when the last user disappeared > in Linus' tree? Mpf, I didn't noticed that removing ww_mutex.h from seqlock.h is causing a problem for futex.h. Just send out a patch to fix this because the build servers are pointing out now that drm-misc-next is broken. Please review ASAP, Christian. > > Cheers, Daniel > >> --- >> include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++------ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h >> index 37ded6b8fee6..3926e9027947 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h >> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h >> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ >> #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h> >> #include <linux/lockdep.h> >> #include <linux/mutex.h> >> -#include <linux/ww_mutex.h> >> #include <linux/preempt.h> >> #include <linux/spinlock.h> >> >> @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) >> * static initializer or init function. This enables lockdep to validate >> * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. >> * >> - * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock, mutex, or ww_mutex. >> + * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock or mutex >> */ >> >> /* >> @@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) >> #define seqcount_spinlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, spinlock) >> #define seqcount_rwlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, rwlock) >> #define seqcount_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, mutex) >> -#define seqcount_ww_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, ww_mutex) >> >> /* >> * SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers >> @@ -277,7 +275,6 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(raw_spinlock, raw_spinlock_t, false, s->lock, raw_s >> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(spinlock, spinlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, spin, spin_lock(s->lock)) >> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(rwlock, rwlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, read, read_lock(s->lock)) >> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) >> -SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mutex, ww_mutex_lock(s->lock, NULL)) >> >> /* >> * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t >> @@ -304,8 +301,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu >> __seqprop_case((s), raw_spinlock, prop), \ >> __seqprop_case((s), spinlock, prop), \ >> __seqprop_case((s), rwlock, prop), \ >> - __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop), \ >> - __seqprop_case((s), ww_mutex, prop)) >> + __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop)) >> >> #define seqprop_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr) >> #define seqprop_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence) >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h index 37ded6b8fee6..3926e9027947 100644 --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h> #include <linux/lockdep.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> -#include <linux/ww_mutex.h> #include <linux/preempt.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) * static initializer or init function. This enables lockdep to validate * that the write side critical section is properly serialized. * - * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock, mutex, or ww_mutex. + * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock or mutex */ /* @@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s) #define seqcount_spinlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, spinlock) #define seqcount_rwlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, rwlock) #define seqcount_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, mutex) -#define seqcount_ww_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, ww_mutex) /* * SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers @@ -277,7 +275,6 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(raw_spinlock, raw_spinlock_t, false, s->lock, raw_s SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(spinlock, spinlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, spin, spin_lock(s->lock)) SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(rwlock, rwlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, read, read_lock(s->lock)) SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) -SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mutex, ww_mutex_lock(s->lock, NULL)) /* * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t @@ -304,8 +301,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu __seqprop_case((s), raw_spinlock, prop), \ __seqprop_case((s), spinlock, prop), \ __seqprop_case((s), rwlock, prop), \ - __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop), \ - __seqprop_case((s), ww_mutex, prop)) + __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop)) #define seqprop_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr) #define seqprop_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence)
Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)