diff mbox series

[v34,11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid

Message ID 20220407212230.12893-12-casey@schaufler-ca.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Paul Moore
Headers show
Series [v34,01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule | expand

Commit Message

Casey Schaufler April 7, 2022, 9:22 p.m. UTC
Change the security_current_getsecid_subj() and
security_task_getsecid_obj() interfaces to fill in
a lsmblob structure instead of a u32 secid in support of
LSM stacking. Audit interfaces will need to collect all
possible secids for possible reporting.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/android/binder.c              |  6 +--
 include/linux/security.h              | 13 ++++---
 kernel/audit.c                        | 16 +++-----
 kernel/auditfilter.c                  |  4 +-
 kernel/auditsc.c                      | 25 ++++++------
 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c     |  5 ++-
 net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h          |  6 ++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 12 +++---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c     | 55 +++++++++++++++------------
 security/security.c                   | 25 +++++++++---
 10 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot April 8, 2022, 3:43 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Casey,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on pcmoore-selinux/next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.18-rc1 next-20220407]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next jmorris-security/next-testing]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220408-062243
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next
config: arm-randconfig-c002-20220408 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220408/202204081146.DPLvGqQ7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/0d4df6ae86e123057cb18eeb5ba1b1eff2641fe4
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220408-062243
        git checkout 0d4df6ae86e123057cb18eeb5ba1b1eff2641fe4
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash security/integrity/ima/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c: In function 'ima_must_appraise':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:81:16: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
      81 |         return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      82 |                                 blob.secid[0], func, mask,
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      83 |                                 IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL,
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      84 |                                 NULL);
         |                                 ~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:14:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:74:24: note: defined here 'blob'
      74 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~


vim +81 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c

    65	
    66	/*
    67	 * ima_must_appraise - set appraise flag
    68	 *
    69	 * Return 1 to appraise or hash
    70	 */
    71	int ima_must_appraise(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
    72			      int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
    73	{
    74		struct lsmblob blob;
    75	
    76		if (!ima_appraise)
    77			return 0;
    78	
    79		security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
    80		/* scaffolding the .secid[0] */
  > 81		return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
    82					blob.secid[0], func, mask,
    83					IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL,
    84					NULL);
    85	}
    86
kernel test robot April 8, 2022, 4:44 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Casey,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on pcmoore-selinux/next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.18-rc1 next-20220407]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next jmorris-security/next-testing]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220408-062243
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next
config: mips-randconfig-r002-20220408 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220408/202204081233.FUUgdt5c-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips64el-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/0d4df6ae86e123057cb18eeb5ba1b1eff2641fe4
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220408-062243
        git checkout 0d4df6ae86e123057cb18eeb5ba1b1eff2641fe4
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=mips SHELL=/bin/bash security/integrity/ima/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_file_check':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:521:16: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     521 |         return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0,
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     522 |                                    mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
         |                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     523 |                                            MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
         |                                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:517:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     517 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_file_mmap':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:413:24: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     413 |                 return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
         |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     414 |                                            NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
         |                                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:408:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     408 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_file_mprotect':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:453:18: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     453 |         action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(vma->vm_file), inode,
         |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     454 |                                 current_cred(), blob.secid[0], MAY_EXEC,
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     455 |                                 MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, NULL, NULL);
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:441:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     441 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_bprm_check':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:495:15: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     495 |         ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     496 |                                   NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
         |                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:491:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     491 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_read_file':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:739:16: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     739 |         return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL,
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     740 |                                    0, MAY_READ, func);
         |                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:717:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     717 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'ima_post_read_file':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:783:16: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     783 |         return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf,
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     784 |                                    size, MAY_READ, func);
         |                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:768:24: note: defined here 'blob'
     768 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c: In function 'process_buffer_measurement':
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:934:26: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
     934 |                 action = ima_get_action(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     935 |                                         blob.secid[0], 0, func, &pcr, &template,
         |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     936 |                                         func_data, NULL);
         |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:26:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:909:24: note: defined here 'blob'
--
   security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c: In function 'ima_must_appraise':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:81:16: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'u32[0]' {aka 'unsigned int[]'} [-Warray-bounds]
      81 |         return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      82 |                                 blob.secid[0], func, mask,
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      83 |                                 IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL,
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      84 |                                 NULL);
         |                                 ~~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/ima.h:12,
                    from security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:14:
   include/linux/security.h:150:17: note: while referencing 'secid'
     150 |         u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
         |                 ^~~~~
   security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:74:24: note: defined here 'blob'
      74 |         struct lsmblob blob;
         |                        ^~~~


vim +521 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c

   504	
   505	/**
   506	 * ima_file_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
   507	 * @file: pointer to the file to be measured
   508	 * @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC or MAY_APPEND
   509	 *
   510	 * Measure files based on the ima_must_measure() policy decision.
   511	 *
   512	 * On success return 0.  On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
   513	 * is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
   514	 */
   515	int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
   516	{
   517		struct lsmblob blob;
   518	
   519		security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
   520		/* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
 > 521		return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0,
   522					   mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
   523						   MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
   524	}
   525	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check);
   526
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 381a4fddd4a5..bae8440ffc73 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -2980,16 +2980,16 @@  static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
 	t->priority = task_nice(current);
 
 	if (target_node && target_node->txn_security_ctx) {
-		u32 secid;
 		struct lsmblob blob;
 		size_t added_size;
+		u32 secid;
 
 		security_cred_getsecid(proc->cred, &secid);
 		/*
-		 * Later in this patch set security_task_getsecid() will
+		 * Later in this patch set security_cred_getsecid() will
 		 * provide a lsmblob instead of a secid. lsmblob_init
 		 * is used to ensure that all the secids in the lsmblob
-		 * get the value returned from security_task_getsecid(),
+		 * get the value returned from security_cred_getsecid(),
 		 * which means that the one expected by
 		 * security_secid_to_secctx() will be set.
 		 */
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 4646ca90f457..10ff7db2232e 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -502,8 +502,8 @@  int security_task_fix_setgid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 int security_task_setpgid(struct task_struct *p, pid_t pgid);
 int security_task_getpgid(struct task_struct *p);
 int security_task_getsid(struct task_struct *p);
-void security_current_getsecid_subj(u32 *secid);
-void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid);
+void security_current_getsecid_subj(struct lsmblob *blob);
+void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, struct lsmblob *blob);
 int security_task_setnice(struct task_struct *p, int nice);
 int security_task_setioprio(struct task_struct *p, int ioprio);
 int security_task_getioprio(struct task_struct *p);
@@ -1199,14 +1199,15 @@  static inline int security_task_getsid(struct task_struct *p)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void security_current_getsecid_subj(u32 *secid)
+static inline void security_current_getsecid_subj(struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
 }
 
-static inline void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid)
+static inline void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p,
+					      struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
 }
 
 static inline int security_task_setnice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 2acf95cf9895..0a7869c9c9ad 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -2178,19 +2178,12 @@  int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	char *ctx = NULL;
 	unsigned len;
 	int error;
-	u32 sid;
 	struct lsmblob blob;
 
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&sid);
-	if (!sid)
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * lsmblob_init sets all values in the lsmblob to sid.
-	 * This is temporary until security_task_getsecid is converted
-	 * to use a lsmblob, which happens later in this patch set.
-	 */
-	lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
 	error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &ctx, &len);
 
 	if (error) {
@@ -2399,6 +2392,7 @@  int audit_set_loginuid(kuid_t loginuid)
 int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	kuid_t uid = current_uid(), auid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	if (auditd_test_task(t) &&
 	    (sig == SIGTERM || sig == SIGHUP ||
@@ -2409,7 +2403,9 @@  int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
 			audit_sig_uid = auid;
 		else
 			audit_sig_uid = uid;
-		security_current_getsecid_subj(&audit_sig_sid);
+		security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+		/* scaffolding until audit_sig_sid is converted */
+		audit_sig_sid = blob.secid[0];
 	}
 
 	return audit_signal_info_syscall(t);
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 15cd4fe35e9c..39ded5cb2429 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1339,7 +1339,6 @@  int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 			struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
 			struct lsmblob blob;
 			pid_t pid;
-			u32 sid;
 
 			switch (f->type) {
 			case AUDIT_PID:
@@ -1369,8 +1368,7 @@  int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 			case AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN:
 			case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
 				if (f->lsm_str) {
-					security_current_getsecid_subj(&sid);
-					lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+					security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
 					result = security_audit_rule_match(
 						   &blob, f->type, f->op,
 						   &f->lsm_rules);
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index d125dba69a76..5ad606cc4814 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -467,7 +467,6 @@  static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 {
 	const struct cred *cred;
 	int i, need_sid = 1;
-	u32 sid;
 	struct lsmblob blob;
 	unsigned int sessionid;
 
@@ -676,17 +675,9 @@  static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 					 * here even though it always refs
 					 * @current's creds
 					 */
-					security_current_getsecid_subj(&sid);
+					security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
 					need_sid = 0;
 				}
-				/*
-				 * lsmblob_init sets all values in the lsmblob
-				 * to sid. This is temporary until
-				 * security_task_getsecid() is converted to
-				 * provide a lsmblob, which happens later in
-				 * this patch set.
-				 */
-				lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
 				result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
 							f->type, f->op,
 							&f->lsm_rules);
@@ -2764,12 +2755,15 @@  int __audit_sockaddr(int len, void *a)
 void __audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	struct audit_context *context = audit_context();
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	context->target_pid = task_tgid_nr(t);
 	context->target_auid = audit_get_loginuid(t);
 	context->target_uid = task_uid(t);
 	context->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t);
-	security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &context->target_sid);
+	security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &blob);
+	/* scaffolding - until target_sid is converted */
+	context->target_sid = blob.secid[0];
 	memcpy(context->target_comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
 }
 
@@ -2785,6 +2779,7 @@  int audit_signal_info_syscall(struct task_struct *t)
 	struct audit_aux_data_pids *axp;
 	struct audit_context *ctx = audit_context();
 	kuid_t t_uid = task_uid(t);
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	if (!audit_signals || audit_dummy_context())
 		return 0;
@@ -2796,7 +2791,9 @@  int audit_signal_info_syscall(struct task_struct *t)
 		ctx->target_auid = audit_get_loginuid(t);
 		ctx->target_uid = t_uid;
 		ctx->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t);
-		security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &ctx->target_sid);
+		security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &blob);
+		/* scaffolding until target_sid is converted */
+		ctx->target_sid = blob.secid[0];
 		memcpy(ctx->target_comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -2817,7 +2814,9 @@  int audit_signal_info_syscall(struct task_struct *t)
 	axp->target_auid[axp->pid_count] = audit_get_loginuid(t);
 	axp->target_uid[axp->pid_count] = t_uid;
 	axp->target_sessionid[axp->pid_count] = audit_get_sessionid(t);
-	security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &axp->target_sid[axp->pid_count]);
+	security_task_getsecid_obj(t, &blob);
+	/* scaffolding until target_sid is converted */
+	axp->target_sid[axp->pid_count] = blob.secid[0];
 	memcpy(axp->target_comm[axp->pid_count], t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
 	axp->pid_count++;
 
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index 0a99663e6edb..c86df6ead742 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1562,11 +1562,14 @@  int __init netlbl_unlabel_defconf(void)
 	int ret_val;
 	struct netlbl_dom_map *entry;
 	struct netlbl_audit audit_info;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	/* Only the kernel is allowed to call this function and the only time
 	 * it is called is at bootup before the audit subsystem is reporting
 	 * messages so don't worry to much about these values. */
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&audit_info.secid);
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding until audit_info.secid is converted */
+	audit_info.secid = blob.secid[0];
 	audit_info.loginuid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
 	audit_info.sessionid = 0;
 
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h b/net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h
index d6c5b31eb4eb..3d5610ed5f0e 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h
@@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ 
  */
 static inline void netlbl_netlink_auditinfo(struct netlbl_audit *audit_info)
 {
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&audit_info->secid);
+	struct lsmblob blob;
+
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding until secid is converted */
+	audit_info->secid = blob.secid[0];
 	audit_info->loginuid = audit_get_loginuid(current);
 	audit_info->sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(current);
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 17232bbfb9f9..217d20c60e1d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -71,15 +71,17 @@  bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void)
 int ima_must_appraise(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
 		      int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
 {
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	if (!ima_appraise)
 		return 0;
 
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-	return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(), secid,
-				func, mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL,
-				NULL, NULL, NULL);
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding the .secid[0] */
+	return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
+				blob.secid[0], func, mask,
+				IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+				NULL);
 }
 
 static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 3d3f8c5c502b..2d99cb996d5f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -405,12 +405,13 @@  static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
  */
 int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 {
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) {
-		security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-		return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL,
-					   0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
+		security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+		/* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */
+		return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
+					   NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -437,9 +438,9 @@  int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot)
 	char *pathbuf = NULL;
 	const char *pathname = NULL;
 	struct inode *inode;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	int result = 0;
 	int action;
-	u32 secid;
 	int pcr;
 
 	/* Is mprotect making an mmap'ed file executable? */
@@ -447,11 +448,11 @@  int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot)
 	    !(prot & PROT_EXEC) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
 		return 0;
 
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
 	inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
 	action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(vma->vm_file), inode,
-				current_cred(), secid, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK,
-				&pcr, &template, NULL, NULL);
+				current_cred(), blob.secid[0], MAY_EXEC,
+				MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* Is the mmap'ed file in policy? */
 	if (!(action & (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)))
@@ -487,10 +488,12 @@  int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 {
 	int ret;
 	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-	ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
-				  MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
+	ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
+				  NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -511,10 +514,11 @@  int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
  */
 int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
 {
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0,
 				   mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
 					   MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
 }
@@ -710,7 +714,7 @@  int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id,
 		  bool contents)
 {
 	enum ima_hooks func;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	/*
 	 * Do devices using pre-allocated memory run the risk of the
@@ -730,8 +734,9 @@  int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id,
 
 	/* Read entire file for all partial reads. */
 	func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL,
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL,
 				   0, MAY_READ, func);
 }
 
@@ -760,7 +765,7 @@  int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
 		       enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
 {
 	enum ima_hooks func;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	/* permit signed certs */
 	if (!file && read_id == READING_X509_CERTIFICATE)
@@ -773,9 +778,10 @@  int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
 	}
 
 	func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
-	security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
-	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, buf, size,
-				   MAY_READ, func);
+	security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+	/* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf,
+				   size, MAY_READ, func);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -900,7 +906,7 @@  int process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 	int digest_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo];
 	int violation = 0;
 	int action = 0;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 
 	if (digest && digest_len < digest_hash_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -923,9 +929,10 @@  int process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 	 * buffer measurements.
 	 */
 	if (func) {
-		security_current_getsecid_subj(&secid);
+		security_current_getsecid_subj(&blob);
+		/* scaffolding */
 		action = ima_get_action(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
-					secid, 0, func, &pcr, &template,
+					blob.secid[0], 0, func, &pcr, &template,
 					func_data, NULL);
 		if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE) && !digest)
 			return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 131c851dd681..eae5b7f3a0db 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1922,17 +1922,30 @@  int security_task_getsid(struct task_struct *p)
 	return call_int_hook(task_getsid, 0, p);
 }
 
-void security_current_getsecid_subj(u32 *secid)
+void security_current_getsecid_subj(struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
-	call_void_hook(current_getsecid_subj, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.current_getsecid_subj,
+			     list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		hp->hook.current_getsecid_subj(&blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_current_getsecid_subj);
 
-void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid)
+void security_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
-	call_void_hook(task_getsecid_obj, p, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.task_getsecid_obj, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		hp->hook.task_getsecid_obj(p, &blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_task_getsecid_obj);