| Message ID | 1649722129-12542-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/msm/dp: stop event kernel thread when DP unbind | expand |
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-11 17:08:49) > Current DP driver implementation, event thread is kept running > after DP display is unbind. This patch fix this problem by disabling > DP irq and stop event thread to exit gracefully at dp_display_unbind(). > > Fixes: e91e3065a806 ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets") > Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> Should add a Reported-by tag from Dmitry here. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > index 01453db..fa1ef8e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > return rc; > } > > +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv); Why can't the function be defined here? > + > static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > void *data) > { > @@ -280,6 +283,8 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master); > struct msm_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private; > > + disable_irq(dp->irq); > + dp_hpd_event_stop(dp); > dp_power_client_deinit(dp->power); > dp_aux_unregister(dp->aux); > priv->dp[dp->id] = NULL; > @@ -1054,7 +1059,7 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data) > > dp_priv = (struct dp_display_private *)data; > > - while (1) { > + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { > if (timeout_mode) { > wait_event_timeout(dp_priv->event_q, > (dp_priv->event_pndx == dp_priv->event_gndx), > @@ -1137,7 +1142,22 @@ static void dp_hpd_event_setup(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) > init_waitqueue_head(&dp_priv->event_q); > spin_lock_init(&dp_priv->event_lock); > > - kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); > + dp_priv->ev_tsk = kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); > + > + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) > + DRM_ERROR("failed to create DP event thread\n"); Why can't we error out? Why can't this kthread be started in probe? > +} > + > +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) > +{ > + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) > + return; > + > + kthread_stop(dp_priv->ev_tsk); > + > + /* reset event q to empty */ > + dp_priv->event_gndx = 0; > + dp_priv->event_pndx = 0; > } >
On 12/04/2022 03:21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-11 17:08:49) >> Current DP driver implementation, event thread is kept running >> after DP display is unbind. This patch fix this problem by disabling >> DP irq and stop event thread to exit gracefully at dp_display_unbind(). >> >> Fixes: e91e3065a806 ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets") >> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> > > Should add a Reported-by tag from Dmitry here. > >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> index 01453db..fa1ef8e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, >> return rc; >> } >> >> +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv); > > Why can't the function be defined here? > >> + >> static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, >> void *data) >> { >> @@ -280,6 +283,8 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, >> struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master); >> struct msm_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private; >> >> + disable_irq(dp->irq); >> + dp_hpd_event_stop(dp); >> dp_power_client_deinit(dp->power); >> dp_aux_unregister(dp->aux); >> priv->dp[dp->id] = NULL; >> @@ -1054,7 +1059,7 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data) >> >> dp_priv = (struct dp_display_private *)data; >> >> - while (1) { >> + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { >> if (timeout_mode) { >> wait_event_timeout(dp_priv->event_q, >> (dp_priv->event_pndx == dp_priv->event_gndx), >> @@ -1137,7 +1142,22 @@ static void dp_hpd_event_setup(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) >> init_waitqueue_head(&dp_priv->event_q); >> spin_lock_init(&dp_priv->event_lock); >> >> - kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); >> + dp_priv->ev_tsk = kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); >> + >> + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) >> + DRM_ERROR("failed to create DP event thread\n"); > > Why can't we error out? Why can't this kthread be started in probe? Just my 2c. I don't think starting it in probe is a good idea. The driver uses components, so, in my opinion, the thread should be started from bind and stopped in unbind. > >> +} >> + >> +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) >> +{ >> + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) >> + return; >> + >> + kthread_stop(dp_priv->ev_tsk); >> + >> + /* reset event q to empty */ >> + dp_priv->event_gndx = 0; >> + dp_priv->event_pndx = 0; >> } >>
On 4/11/2022 5:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 12/04/2022 03:21, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-11 17:08:49) >>> Current DP driver implementation, event thread is kept running >>> after DP display is unbind. This patch fix this problem by disabling >>> DP irq and stop event thread to exit gracefully at dp_display_unbind(). >>> >>> Fixes: e91e3065a806 ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on >>> Snapdragon Chipsets") >>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> >> >> Should add a Reported-by tag from Dmitry here. >> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >>> index 01453db..fa1ef8e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >>> @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, >>> struct device *master, >>> return rc; >>> } >>> >>> +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv); >> >> Why can't the function be defined here? >> >>> + >>> static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device >>> *master, >>> void *data) >>> { >>> @@ -280,6 +283,8 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, >>> struct device *master, >>> struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master); >>> struct msm_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private; >>> >>> + disable_irq(dp->irq); >>> + dp_hpd_event_stop(dp); >>> dp_power_client_deinit(dp->power); >>> dp_aux_unregister(dp->aux); >>> priv->dp[dp->id] = NULL; >>> @@ -1054,7 +1059,7 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data) >>> >>> dp_priv = (struct dp_display_private *)data; >>> >>> - while (1) { >>> + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { >>> if (timeout_mode) { >>> wait_event_timeout(dp_priv->event_q, >>> (dp_priv->event_pndx == >>> dp_priv->event_gndx), >>> @@ -1137,7 +1142,22 @@ static void dp_hpd_event_setup(struct >>> dp_display_private *dp_priv) >>> init_waitqueue_head(&dp_priv->event_q); >>> spin_lock_init(&dp_priv->event_lock); >>> >>> - kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); >>> + dp_priv->ev_tsk = kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, >>> "dp_hpd_handler"); >>> + >>> + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) >>> + DRM_ERROR("failed to create DP event thread\n"); >> >> Why can't we error out? Why can't this kthread be started in probe? > > Just my 2c. I don't think starting it in probe is a good idea. The > driver uses components, so, in my opinion, the thread should be started > from bind and stopped in unbind. Yes, I also agree it should be started in bind and stopped in unbind. > >> >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) >>> +{ >>> + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + kthread_stop(dp_priv->ev_tsk); >>> + >>> + /* reset event q to empty */ >>> + dp_priv->event_gndx = 0; >>> + dp_priv->event_pndx = 0; >>> } >>> > >
Quoting Abhinav Kumar (2022-04-11 17:29:17) > > > On 4/11/2022 5:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On 12/04/2022 03:21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-11 17:08:49) > >>> - kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); > >>> + dp_priv->ev_tsk = kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, > >>> "dp_hpd_handler"); > >>> + > >>> + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) > >>> + DRM_ERROR("failed to create DP event thread\n"); > >> > >> Why can't we error out? Why can't this kthread be started in probe? > > > > Just my 2c. I don't think starting it in probe is a good idea. The > > driver uses components, so, in my opinion, the thread should be started > > from bind and stopped in unbind. > > Yes, I also agree it should be started in bind and stopped in unbind. > Sounds good to me! I forgot that this is a component.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c index 01453db..fa1ef8e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct dp_display_private { u32 hpd_state; u32 event_pndx; u32 event_gndx; + struct task_struct *ev_tsk; struct dp_event event_list[DP_EVENT_Q_MAX]; spinlock_t event_lock; @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, return rc; } +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv); + static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data) { @@ -280,6 +283,8 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(master); struct msm_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private; + disable_irq(dp->irq); + dp_hpd_event_stop(dp); dp_power_client_deinit(dp->power); dp_aux_unregister(dp->aux); priv->dp[dp->id] = NULL; @@ -1054,7 +1059,7 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data) dp_priv = (struct dp_display_private *)data; - while (1) { + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { if (timeout_mode) { wait_event_timeout(dp_priv->event_q, (dp_priv->event_pndx == dp_priv->event_gndx), @@ -1137,7 +1142,22 @@ static void dp_hpd_event_setup(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) init_waitqueue_head(&dp_priv->event_q); spin_lock_init(&dp_priv->event_lock); - kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); + dp_priv->ev_tsk = kthread_run(hpd_event_thread, dp_priv, "dp_hpd_handler"); + + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) + DRM_ERROR("failed to create DP event thread\n"); +} + +static void dp_hpd_event_stop(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv) +{ + if (IS_ERR(dp_priv->ev_tsk)) + return; + + kthread_stop(dp_priv->ev_tsk); + + /* reset event q to empty */ + dp_priv->event_gndx = 0; + dp_priv->event_pndx = 0; } static irqreturn_t dp_display_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
Current DP driver implementation, event thread is kept running after DP display is unbind. This patch fix this problem by disabling DP irq and stop event thread to exit gracefully at dp_display_unbind(). Fixes: e91e3065a806 ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets") Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)