Message ID | 20220408112928.1326755-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: fsl_micfil: Driver updates | expand |
Hi Mark, Ok to apply this series? I just realized that I missed to Cc: you on this series. Let me know if I should resend. Sascha On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 01:29:07PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > This series has a bunch of cleanups for the FSL MICFIL driver. There is > not much chance for regressions in this series as the driver currently > can't work at all. The MICFIL needs multififo support in the i.MX SDMA > engine which is added with this series, see 11/20. > > The multififo support is selected in the dma phandle arguments in the > device tree, the transfer type must be '25' aka IMX_DMATYPE_MULTI_SAI. > This is set already to 25 in the upstream i.MX8M[NM] dtsi files, but the > SDMA driver silently ignores unsupported values instead of throwing an > error. This is fixed in this series and multififo support is added. > > The dmaengine patches have acks from Vinod, so the series is free to > go through the ASoC tree. > > Changes since v4: > - collect more acks > - whitespace cleanup in 16/21 > > Changes since v3: > - Add commit log to "ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop unused variables" > - Fix include name in "ASoC: fsl_micfil: add multi fifo support" > - Drop unnecessary temporary adding of struct fsl_micfil::osr > - Leave default quality setting at 'medium' > - Drop debugging message printed at error level > - collect acks from Shengjiu Wang and Vinod Koul > > Changes since v2: > - Add forgotten commit log to dmaengine patches > - Add patch to move include/linux/platform_data/dma-imx.h to include/linux/dma/imx-dma.h > - Use prefix dmaengine: for dma patches > > Changes since v1: > - Drop unused variable sw_done_sel > - Evaluate sdmac->direction directly instead of storing value in n_fifos > - add missing include linux/bitfield.h > > Sascha Hauer (21): > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unused register read > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop fsl_micfil_set_mclk_rate() > ASoC: fsl_micfil: do not define SHIFT/MASK for single bits > ASoC: fsl_micfil: use GENMASK to define register bit fields > ASoC: fsl_micfil: use clear/set bits > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop error messages from failed register accesses > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop unused variables > dmaengine: imx: Move header to include/dma/ > dmaengine: imx-sdma: error out on unsupported transfer types > dmaengine: imx-sdma: Add multi fifo support > ASoC: fsl_micfil: add multi fifo support > ASoC: fsl_micfil: use define for OSR default value > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop get_pdm_clk() > ASoC: fsl_micfil: simplify clock setting > ASoC: fsl_micfil: rework quality setting > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop unused include > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop only once used defines > ASoC: fsl_micfil: drop support for undocumented property > ASoC: fsl_micfil: fold fsl_set_clock_params() into its only user > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Remove debug message > > drivers/dma/imx-dma.c | 2 +- > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 76 +++- > drivers/mmc/host/mxcmmc.c | 2 +- > drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 2 +- > drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 2 +- > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 2 +- > drivers/video/fbdev/mx3fb.c | 2 +- > .../dma-imx.h => dma/imx-dma.h} | 26 +- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 2 +- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c | 2 +- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.h | 2 +- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c | 369 +++++++----------- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.h | 269 +++---------- > sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm.h | 2 +- > sound/soc/fsl/imx-ssi.h | 2 +- > 15 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 465 deletions(-) > rename include/linux/{platform_data/dma-imx.h => dma/imx-dma.h} (67%) > > -- > 2.30.2 > >
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Ok to apply this series? I just realized that I missed to Cc: you on > this series. Let me know if I should resend. Please resend. What's the plan with the dmaengine bits - it looks like the ASoC bits are relatively substatantial here?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:29:16AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Ok to apply this series? I just realized that I missed to Cc: you on > > this series. Let me know if I should resend. > > Please resend. What's the plan with the dmaengine bits - it looks like > the ASoC bits are relatively substatantial here? Ok, I'll resend. I'd like to merge the dmaengine bits through your tree. I have collected the acks from Vinod for this. I just rechecked there are no conflicts with -next so far. Sascha