diff mbox series

[2/2] riscv: dts: sifive: fu540-c000: align dma node name with dtschema

Message ID 20220318162044.169350-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/2] dt-bindings: dmaengine: sifive, fu540-c000: include generic schema | expand

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski March 18, 2022, 4:20 p.m. UTC
Fixes dtbs_check warnings like:

  dma@3000000: $nodename:0: 'dma@3000000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski April 19, 2022, 10:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On 18/03/2022 17:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
> 
>   dma@3000000: $nodename:0: 'dma@3000000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Any comments here?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Conor Dooley April 19, 2022, 10:45 a.m. UTC | #2
On 19/04/2022 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 18/03/2022 17:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
>>
>>    dma@3000000: $nodename:0: 'dma@3000000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Any comments here?

Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/

Maybe you could add your review to his version?
Krzysztof Kozlowski April 19, 2022, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On 19/04/2022 12:45, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 19/04/2022 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 18/03/2022 17:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
>>>
>>>    dma@3000000: $nodename:0: 'dma@3000000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$'
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Any comments here?
> 
> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
> 
> Maybe you could add your review to his version?

Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
patches take so much time to pick up?

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220318162044.169350-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Conor Dooley April 19, 2022, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #4
On 19/04/2022 10:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 19/04/2022 12:45, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 19/04/2022 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 18/03/2022 17:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
>>>>
>>>>     dma@3000000: $nodename:0: 'dma@3000000' does not match '^dma-controller(@.*)?$'
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Any comments here?
>>
>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
>>
>> Maybe you could add your review to his version?
> 
> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
> patches take so much time to pick up?
> 

Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8,
I should've checked further back - sorry!
Krzysztof Kozlowski April 19, 2022, 10:59 a.m. UTC | #5
On 19/04/2022 12:57, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
>>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
>>>
>>> Maybe you could add your review to his version?
>>
>> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
>> patches take so much time to pick up?
>>
> 
> Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8,
> I should've checked further back - sorry!

No problem :)

I don't mind Zong's patch to be taken although in general I believe more
in FIFO (or FIF Served) style.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Zong Li April 19, 2022, 12:18 p.m. UTC | #6
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 於 2022年4月19日 週二 下午6:59寫道:
>
> On 19/04/2022 12:57, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix
> >>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@sifive.com/
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you could add your review to his version?
> >>
> >> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS
> >> patches take so much time to pick up?
> >>
> >
> > Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8,
> > I should've checked further back - sorry!
>
> No problem :)
>
> I don't mind Zong's patch to be taken although in general I believe more
> in FIFO (or FIF Served) style.
>

Hi all,
Thanks Conor brings me here. The patch 1 and 4 in my series has been
applied into dmaengine/next, but patch 2 and 3 should go by riscv
tree, so I guess that I could re-send the patch 2 based on top of
Krzysztof's patch, then let's drop the patch 2 & 3 of another
patchset. I will keep follow up here. Thanks all.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
index 3eef52b1a59b..fd93fdadd28c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@  uart0: serial@10010000 {
 			clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>;
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
-		dma: dma@3000000 {
+		dma: dma-controller@3000000 {
 			compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-pdma";
 			reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x8000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;