diff mbox series

[v2,3/9] clk: qcom: msm8996-cpu: Add MSM8996 Pro CBF support

Message ID kXrAkKv7RZct22X0wivLWqOAiLKpFuDCAY1KY_KSx649kn7BNmJ2IFFMrsYPAyDlcxIjbQCQ1PHb5KaNFawm9IGIXUbch-DI9OI_l73BAaM=@protonmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series Add support for MSM8996 Pro | expand

Commit Message

Yassine Oudjana April 9, 2022, 4:16 a.m. UTC
MSM8996 Pro (MSM8996SG) has a /4 divisor on the CBF clock
instead of /2. This allows it to reach a lower minimum frequency
of 192000000Hz compared to 307200000Hz on regular MSM8996.
Add support for setting the CBF clock divisor to /4 for MSM8996 Pro.

Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--
2.35.1

Comments

Bjorn Andersson April 19, 2022, 5:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri 08 Apr 23:16 CDT 2022, Yassine Oudjana wrote:

> MSM8996 Pro (MSM8996SG) has a /4 divisor on the CBF clock
> instead of /2. This allows it to reach a lower minimum frequency
> of 192000000Hz compared to 307200000Hz on regular MSM8996.
> Add support for setting the CBF clock divisor to /4 for MSM8996 Pro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> index 8afc271f92d0..231d8224fa16 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ enum _pmux_input {
> 
>  enum {
>  	CBF_PLL_INDEX = 1,
> -	CBF_DIV_2_INDEX,
> +	CBF_DIV_INDEX,
>  	CBF_SAFE_INDEX
>  };

I don't have this enum in my tree. Could you please double check that
this works on linux-next?

And can you please send the next revision using git send-email with a
cover-letter, so that the patches are related in my inbox.

Thanks,
Bjorn

> 
> -#define DIV_2_THRESHOLD		600000000
> +#define DIV_THRESHOLD		600000000
>  #define PWRCL_REG_OFFSET 0x0
>  #define PERFCL_REG_OFFSET 0x80000
>  #define MUX_OFFSET	0x40
> @@ -142,6 +142,17 @@ static const struct alpha_pll_config cbfpll_config = {
>  	.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
>  };
> 
> +static const struct alpha_pll_config cbfpll_config_pro = {
> +	.l = 72,
> +	.config_ctl_val = 0x200d4aa8,
> +	.config_ctl_hi_val = 0x006,
> +	.pre_div_mask = BIT(12),
> +	.post_div_mask = 0x3 << 8,
> +	.post_div_val = 0x3 << 8,
> +	.main_output_mask = BIT(0),
> +	.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_alpha_pll perfcl_pll = {
>  	.offset = PERFCL_REG_OFFSET,
>  	.regs = prim_pll_regs,
> @@ -230,7 +241,8 @@ struct clk_cpu_8996_mux {
>  	u8	width;
>  	struct notifier_block nb;
>  	struct clk_hw	*pll;
> -	struct clk_hw	*pll_div_2;
> +	struct clk_hw	*pll_div;
> +	u8 div;
>  	struct clk_regmap clkr;
>  };
> 
> @@ -280,11 +292,11 @@ static int clk_cpu_8996_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *cpuclk = to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(hw);
>  	struct clk_hw *parent = cpuclk->pll;
> 
> -	if (cpuclk->pll_div_2 && req->rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD) {
> -		if (req->rate < (DIV_2_THRESHOLD / 2))
> +	if (cpuclk->pll_div && req->rate < DIV_THRESHOLD) {
> +		if (req->rate < (DIV_THRESHOLD / cpuclk->div))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> 
> -		parent = cpuclk->pll_div_2;
> +		parent = cpuclk->pll_div;
>  	}
> 
>  	req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent, req->rate);
> @@ -336,7 +348,8 @@ static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux pwrcl_pmux = {
>  	.shift = 0,
>  	.width = 2,
>  	.pll = &pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw,
> -	.pll_div_2 = &pwrcl_smux.clkr.hw,
> +	.pll_div = &pwrcl_smux.clkr.hw,
> +	.div = 2,
>  	.nb.notifier_call = cpu_clk_notifier_cb,
>  	.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
>  		.name = "pwrcl_pmux",
> @@ -358,7 +371,8 @@ static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux perfcl_pmux = {
>  	.shift = 0,
>  	.width = 2,
>  	.pll = &perfcl_pll.clkr.hw,
> -	.pll_div_2 = &perfcl_smux.clkr.hw,
> +	.pll_div = &perfcl_smux.clkr.hw,
> +	.div = 2,
>  	.nb.notifier_call = cpu_clk_notifier_cb,
>  	.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
>  		.name = "perfcl_pmux",
> @@ -481,19 +495,23 @@ static int qcom_cbf_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev,
>  					      struct regmap *regmap)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> +	bool is_pro = of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,msm8996pro-apcc");
> 
> -	cbf_mux.pll_div_2 = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "cbf_pll_main",
> -						      "cbf_pll", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> -						      1, 2);
> -	if (IS_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div_2)) {
> +	cbf_mux.div = is_pro ? 4 : 2;
> +	cbf_mux.pll_div = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "cbf_pll_main",
> +						       "cbf_pll", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +						       1, cbf_mux.div);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize cbf_pll_main\n");
> -		return PTR_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div_2);
> +		return PTR_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div);
>  	}
> 
>  	ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, cbf_msm8996_clks[0]);
>  	ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, cbf_msm8996_clks[1]);
> 
> -	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&cbf_pll, regmap, &cbfpll_config);
> +	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&cbf_pll, regmap, is_pro ?
> +				&cbfpll_config_pro : &cbfpll_config);
>  	clk_set_rate(cbf_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 614400000);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(cbf_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
>  	clk_notifier_register(cbf_mux.clkr.hw.clk, &cbf_mux.nb);
> @@ -575,7 +593,7 @@ static int cpu_clk_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>  		qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_acd_init(base);
>  		break;
>  	case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
> -		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
> +		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
>  			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cpuclk->clkr.hw,
>  							  DIV_2_INDEX);
>  		else
> @@ -600,15 +618,15 @@ static int cbf_clk_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> 
>  	switch (event) {
>  	case PRE_RATE_CHANGE:
> -		parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
> -		ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
> +		parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);
> +		ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);
> 
> -		if (cnd->old_rate > DIV_2_THRESHOLD && cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
> -			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->old_rate / 2);
> +		if (cnd->old_rate > DIV_THRESHOLD && cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
> +			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->old_rate / cbfclk->div);
>  		break;
>  	case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
> -		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
> -			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
> +		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
> +			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);
>  		else {
>  			parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_PLL_INDEX);
>  			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->new_rate);
> @@ -676,6 +694,7 @@ static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>  static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-apcc" },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996pro-apcc" },
>  	{}
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table);
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Yassine Oudjana April 19, 2022, 5:55 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tuesday, April 19th, 2022 at 9:49 PM, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri 08 Apr 23:16 CDT 2022, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
>
> > MSM8996 Pro (MSM8996SG) has a /4 divisor on the CBF clock
> > instead of /2. This allows it to reach a lower minimum frequency
> > of 192000000Hz compared to 307200000Hz on regular MSM8996.
> > Add support for setting the CBF clock divisor to /4 for MSM8996 Pro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana y.oudjana@protonmail.com
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > index 8afc271f92d0..231d8224fa16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ enum _pmux_input {
> >
> > enum {
> > CBF_PLL_INDEX = 1,
> > - CBF_DIV_2_INDEX,
> > + CBF_DIV_INDEX,
> > CBF_SAFE_INDEX
> > };
>
>
> I don't have this enum in my tree. Could you please double check that
> this works on linux-next?

It's added in a patch[1] that isn't applied yet. The patch is mentioned
in the cover letter, which you had trouble finding unfortunately.

> And can you please send the next revision using git send-email with a
> cover-letter, so that the patches are related in my inbox.

Sorry about that. I've already resent the series properly. You should
find [PATCH RESEND v2 */9] in your inbox, otherwise here[2] is a link.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210528192541.1120703-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220416025637.83484-1-y.oudjana@protonmail.com/T/#t
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
index 8afc271f92d0..231d8224fa16 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
@@ -70,11 +70,11 @@  enum _pmux_input {

 enum {
 	CBF_PLL_INDEX = 1,
-	CBF_DIV_2_INDEX,
+	CBF_DIV_INDEX,
 	CBF_SAFE_INDEX
 };

-#define DIV_2_THRESHOLD		600000000
+#define DIV_THRESHOLD		600000000
 #define PWRCL_REG_OFFSET 0x0
 #define PERFCL_REG_OFFSET 0x80000
 #define MUX_OFFSET	0x40
@@ -142,6 +142,17 @@  static const struct alpha_pll_config cbfpll_config = {
 	.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
 };

+static const struct alpha_pll_config cbfpll_config_pro = {
+	.l = 72,
+	.config_ctl_val = 0x200d4aa8,
+	.config_ctl_hi_val = 0x006,
+	.pre_div_mask = BIT(12),
+	.post_div_mask = 0x3 << 8,
+	.post_div_val = 0x3 << 8,
+	.main_output_mask = BIT(0),
+	.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
+};
+
 static struct clk_alpha_pll perfcl_pll = {
 	.offset = PERFCL_REG_OFFSET,
 	.regs = prim_pll_regs,
@@ -230,7 +241,8 @@  struct clk_cpu_8996_mux {
 	u8	width;
 	struct notifier_block nb;
 	struct clk_hw	*pll;
-	struct clk_hw	*pll_div_2;
+	struct clk_hw	*pll_div;
+	u8 div;
 	struct clk_regmap clkr;
 };

@@ -280,11 +292,11 @@  static int clk_cpu_8996_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *cpuclk = to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(hw);
 	struct clk_hw *parent = cpuclk->pll;

-	if (cpuclk->pll_div_2 && req->rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD) {
-		if (req->rate < (DIV_2_THRESHOLD / 2))
+	if (cpuclk->pll_div && req->rate < DIV_THRESHOLD) {
+		if (req->rate < (DIV_THRESHOLD / cpuclk->div))
 			return -EINVAL;

-		parent = cpuclk->pll_div_2;
+		parent = cpuclk->pll_div;
 	}

 	req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent, req->rate);
@@ -336,7 +348,8 @@  static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux pwrcl_pmux = {
 	.shift = 0,
 	.width = 2,
 	.pll = &pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw,
-	.pll_div_2 = &pwrcl_smux.clkr.hw,
+	.pll_div = &pwrcl_smux.clkr.hw,
+	.div = 2,
 	.nb.notifier_call = cpu_clk_notifier_cb,
 	.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
 		.name = "pwrcl_pmux",
@@ -358,7 +371,8 @@  static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux perfcl_pmux = {
 	.shift = 0,
 	.width = 2,
 	.pll = &perfcl_pll.clkr.hw,
-	.pll_div_2 = &perfcl_smux.clkr.hw,
+	.pll_div = &perfcl_smux.clkr.hw,
+	.div = 2,
 	.nb.notifier_call = cpu_clk_notifier_cb,
 	.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
 		.name = "perfcl_pmux",
@@ -481,19 +495,23 @@  static int qcom_cbf_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev,
 					      struct regmap *regmap)
 {
 	int ret;
+	bool is_pro = of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,msm8996pro-apcc");

-	cbf_mux.pll_div_2 = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "cbf_pll_main",
-						      "cbf_pll", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
-						      1, 2);
-	if (IS_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div_2)) {
+	cbf_mux.div = is_pro ? 4 : 2;
+	cbf_mux.pll_div = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "cbf_pll_main",
+						       "cbf_pll", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+						       1, cbf_mux.div);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize cbf_pll_main\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div_2);
+		return PTR_ERR(cbf_mux.pll_div);
 	}

 	ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, cbf_msm8996_clks[0]);
 	ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, cbf_msm8996_clks[1]);

-	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&cbf_pll, regmap, &cbfpll_config);
+	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&cbf_pll, regmap, is_pro ?
+				&cbfpll_config_pro : &cbfpll_config);
 	clk_set_rate(cbf_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 614400000);
 	clk_prepare_enable(cbf_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
 	clk_notifier_register(cbf_mux.clkr.hw.clk, &cbf_mux.nb);
@@ -575,7 +593,7 @@  static int cpu_clk_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
 		qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_acd_init(base);
 		break;
 	case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
-		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
+		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
 			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cpuclk->clkr.hw,
 							  DIV_2_INDEX);
 		else
@@ -600,15 +618,15 @@  static int cbf_clk_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,

 	switch (event) {
 	case PRE_RATE_CHANGE:
-		parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
-		ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
+		parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);
+		ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);

-		if (cnd->old_rate > DIV_2_THRESHOLD && cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
-			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->old_rate / 2);
+		if (cnd->old_rate > DIV_THRESHOLD && cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
+			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->old_rate / cbfclk->div);
 		break;
 	case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
-		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_2_THRESHOLD)
-			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_2_INDEX);
+		if (cnd->new_rate < DIV_THRESHOLD)
+			ret = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_DIV_INDEX);
 		else {
 			parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(&cbfclk->clkr.hw, CBF_PLL_INDEX);
 			ret = clk_set_rate(parent->clk, cnd->new_rate);
@@ -676,6 +694,7 @@  static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

 static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-apcc" },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996pro-apcc" },
 	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table);