Message ID | 20220419142221.2349382-1-ivecera@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net,v2] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net |
netdev/apply | fail | Patch does not apply to net |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Ivan > Vecera > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 7:22 AM > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Fei Liu <feliu@redhat.com>; moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS <intel- > wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>; mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>; Brett Creeley > <brett.creeley@intel.com>; open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Jakub > Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller > <davem@davemloft.net> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in > ice_vc_process_vf_msg() > > Previous patch labelled "ice: Fix incorrect locking in > ice_vc_process_vf_msg()" fixed an issue with ignored messages > sent by VF driver but a small race window still left. > > Recently caught trace during 'ip link set ... vf 0 vlan ...' operation: > > [ 7332.995625] ice 0000:3b:00.0: Clearing port VLAN on VF 0 > [ 7333.001023] iavf 0000:3b:01.0: Reset indication received from the PF > [ 7333.007391] iavf 0000:3b:01.0: Scheduling reset task > [ 7333.059575] iavf 0000:3b:01.0: PF returned error -5 (IAVF_ERR_PARAM) to our > request 3 > [ 7333.059626] ice 0000:3b:00.0: Invalid message from VF 0, opcode 3, len 4, > error -1 > > Setting of VLAN for VF causes a reset of the affected VF using > ice_reset_vf() function that runs with cfg_lock taken: > > 1. ice_notify_vf_reset() informs IAVF driver that reset is needed and > IAVF schedules its own reset procedure > 2. Bit ICE_VF_STATE_DIS is set in vf->vf_state > 3. Misc initialization steps > 4. ice_sriov_post_vsi_rebuild() -> ice_vf_set_initialized() and that > clears ICE_VF_STATE_DIS in vf->vf_state > > Step 3 is mentioned race window because IAVF reset procedure runs in > parallel and one of its step is sending of VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES > message (opcode==3). This message is handled in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() > and if it is received during the mentioned race window then it's > marked as invalid and error is returned to VF driver. > > Protect vf_state check in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() by cfg_lock to avoid > this race condition. > > Fixes: e6ba5273d4ed ("ice: Fix race conditions between virtchnl handling and VF > ndo ops") > Tested-by: Fei Liu <feliu@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Thanks, this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c | 12 +++++------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > index 5612c032f15a..b72606c9e6d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > @@ -3625,6 +3625,8 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct > ice_rq_event_info *event) > return; > } > > + mutex_lock(&vf->cfg_lock); > + > /* Check if VF is disabled. */ > if (test_bit(ICE_VF_STATE_DIS, vf->vf_states)) { > err = -EPERM; > @@ -3648,19 +3650,14 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct > ice_rq_event_info *event) > NULL, 0); > dev_err(dev, "Invalid message from VF %d, opcode %d, len %d, > error %d\n", > vf_id, v_opcode, msglen, err); > - ice_put_vf(vf); > - return; > + goto finish; > } > > - mutex_lock(&vf->cfg_lock); > - > if (!ice_vc_is_opcode_allowed(vf, v_opcode)) { > ice_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, v_opcode, > VIRTCHNL_STATUS_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, > NULL, > 0); > - mutex_unlock(&vf->cfg_lock); > - ice_put_vf(vf); > - return; > + goto finish; > } > > switch (v_opcode) { > @@ -3773,6 +3770,7 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct > ice_rq_event_info *event) > vf_id, v_opcode, err); > } > > +finish: > mutex_unlock(&vf->cfg_lock); > ice_put_vf(vf); > } > -- > 2.35.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-wired-lan mailing list > Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org > https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of > Keller, Jacob E > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 6:41 PM > To: ivecera <ivecera@redhat.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Fei Liu <feliu@redhat.com>; mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>; Brett > Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com>; open list <linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org>; moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS <intel- > wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni > <pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: Protect vf_state check by > cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf > > Of Ivan Vecera > > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 7:22 AM > > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: Fei Liu <feliu@redhat.com>; moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS > > <intel- wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>; mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>; > > Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com>; open list > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller > <davem@davemloft.net> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: Protect vf_state check > > by cfg_lock in > > ice_vc_process_vf_msg() > > > > Previous patch labelled "ice: Fix incorrect locking in > > ice_vc_process_vf_msg()" fixed an issue with ignored messages sent by > > VF driver but a small race window still left. > > > > Recently caught trace during 'ip link set ... vf 0 vlan ...' operation: > > > > [ 7332.995625] ice 0000:3b:00.0: Clearing port VLAN on VF 0 [ > > 7333.001023] iavf 0000:3b:01.0: Reset indication received from the PF > > [ 7333.007391] iavf 0000:3b:01.0: Scheduling reset task [ 7333.059575] > > iavf 0000:3b:01.0: PF returned error -5 (IAVF_ERR_PARAM) to our > > request 3 [ 7333.059626] ice 0000:3b:00.0: Invalid message from VF 0, > > opcode 3, len 4, error -1 > > > > Setting of VLAN for VF causes a reset of the affected VF using > > ice_reset_vf() function that runs with cfg_lock taken: > > > > 1. ice_notify_vf_reset() informs IAVF driver that reset is needed and > > IAVF schedules its own reset procedure 2. Bit ICE_VF_STATE_DIS is > > set in vf->vf_state 3. Misc initialization steps 4. > > ice_sriov_post_vsi_rebuild() -> ice_vf_set_initialized() and that > > clears ICE_VF_STATE_DIS in vf->vf_state > > > > Step 3 is mentioned race window because IAVF reset procedure runs in > > parallel and one of its step is sending of > > VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES message (opcode==3). This message > is > > handled in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() and if it is received during the > > mentioned race window then it's marked as invalid and error is returned to > VF driver. > > > > Protect vf_state check in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() by cfg_lock to avoid > > this race condition. > > > > Fixes: e6ba5273d4ed ("ice: Fix race conditions between virtchnl > > handling and VF ndo ops") > > Tested-by: Fei Liu <feliu@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> > > Thanks, this looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> > > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c | 12 +++++------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > > index 5612c032f15a..b72606c9e6d0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c > > @@ -3625,6 +3625,8 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, > > struct ice_rq_event_info *event) Tested-by: Konrad Jankowski <konrad0.jankowski@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c index 5612c032f15a..b72606c9e6d0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c @@ -3625,6 +3625,8 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_rq_event_info *event) return; } + mutex_lock(&vf->cfg_lock); + /* Check if VF is disabled. */ if (test_bit(ICE_VF_STATE_DIS, vf->vf_states)) { err = -EPERM; @@ -3648,19 +3650,14 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_rq_event_info *event) NULL, 0); dev_err(dev, "Invalid message from VF %d, opcode %d, len %d, error %d\n", vf_id, v_opcode, msglen, err); - ice_put_vf(vf); - return; + goto finish; } - mutex_lock(&vf->cfg_lock); - if (!ice_vc_is_opcode_allowed(vf, v_opcode)) { ice_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, v_opcode, VIRTCHNL_STATUS_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, NULL, 0); - mutex_unlock(&vf->cfg_lock); - ice_put_vf(vf); - return; + goto finish; } switch (v_opcode) { @@ -3773,6 +3770,7 @@ void ice_vc_process_vf_msg(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_rq_event_info *event) vf_id, v_opcode, err); } +finish: mutex_unlock(&vf->cfg_lock); ice_put_vf(vf); }