Message ID | cover.1652405421.git.ashutosh.dixit@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes | expand |
On Thu, 12 May 2022 23:58:55 -0700, Patchwork wrote: > > Patch Details > > Series: drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes (rev6) > URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/ > State: failure > Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_102665v6/index.html > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11646_full -> Patchwork_102665v6_full > > FAILURE > > Possible regressions > > * {igt@i915_pm_freq_mult@media-freq@gt0} (NEW): > > * shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> SKIP This skip is expected, this new IGT will skip on unsupported platforms. > > * igt@prime_self_import@export-vs-gem_close-race: > > * shard-tglb: PASS -> FAIL This failure is unrelated. It is seen here too: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99867/ Thanks. -- Ashutosh
I have reopened the https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4440 igt@prime_self_import@reimport-vs-gem_close-race - fail - Failed assertion: obj_count == 0,error: -2 != 0 "{igt@i915_pm_freq_mult@media-freq@gt0" is not yet in CI bug log. Thanks, Lakshmi. -----Original Message----- From: Dixit, Ashutosh <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 12:19 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes (rev6) On Thu, 12 May 2022 23:58:55 -0700, Patchwork wrote: > > Patch Details > > Series: drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes (rev6) > URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/ > State: failure > Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_102665v6/index.html > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11646_full -> Patchwork_102665v6_full > > FAILURE > > Possible regressions > > * {igt@i915_pm_freq_mult@media-freq@gt0} (NEW): > > * shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> SKIP This skip is expected, this new IGT will skip on unsupported platforms. > > * igt@prime_self_import@export-vs-gem_close-race: > > * shard-tglb: PASS -> FAIL This failure is unrelated. It is seen here too: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99867/ Thanks. -- Ashutosh
On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different > frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for > this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to > previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new > functionality: > * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq > * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's > * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's > * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers > * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq > * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation > and some code refactoring Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes smoothly. Regards, Tvrtko > IGT tests for this new functionality have also been posted at: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/103175/ > > Test-with: 20220513011500.73460-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com > > v2: Fixed commit author on patches 5 and 6 (Rodrigo) > Added new patch 4 > v3: Expose pcode functions in terms of uncore rather than gt (Jani/Rodrigo) > v4: Retain previous pcode function names to eliminate > needless #defines (Rodrigo) > v5: Add new patch 4 and remove last two patches in the v4 series which will > be submitted later. Other mostly minor fixes from code review > v6: Identical to v5, only update "Test-with:" since CI did not pick up > previous "Test-with:" probably because it was old > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > Ashutosh Dixit (5): > drm/i915: Introduce has_media_ratio_mode > drm/i915/gt: Add media freq factor to per-gt sysfs > drm/i915/pcode: Extend pcode functions for multiple gt's > drm/i915/pcode: Init pcode on different gt's > drm/i915/gt: Fix memory leaks in per-gt sysfs > > Dale B Stimson (2): > drm/i915/pcode: Add a couple of pcode helpers > drm/i915/gt: Add media RP0/RPn to per-gt sysfs > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 16 +- > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +- > .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs.c | 29 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs.h | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 3 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_llc.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c | 2 +- > .../drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h | 6 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 20 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h | 1 + > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 3 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 20 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c | 93 +++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h | 20 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 +- > 32 files changed, 363 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) >
On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:57:51 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > > Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different > > frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for > > this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to > > previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new > > functionality: > > * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq > > * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's > > * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's > > * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers > > * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq > > * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation > > and some code refactoring > > Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch > cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. > > You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes > smoothly. I sent the patches out Mon but am struggling to get a satisfactory CI run from what it looks like are CI issues (CI runs were fine on previous versions). Will update after we have successful CI. Thanks.
On Wed, 25 May 2022 01:21:06 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:57:51 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > > > Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different > > > frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for > > > this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to > > > previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new > > > functionality: > > > * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq > > > * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's > > > * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's > > > * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers > > > * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq > > > * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation > > > and some code refactoring > > > > Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch > > cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes > > smoothly. > > I sent the patches out Mon but am struggling to get a satisfactory CI run > from what it looks like are CI issues (CI runs were fine on previous > versions). Will update after we have successful CI. Thanks. Hi Tvrtko, We now have CI results. They look good to me (except that there is a false positive). In case you think this is good enough to merge these patches now: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/#rev10 Thanks. -- Ashutosh
On 26/05/2022 09:12, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2022 01:21:06 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: >> >> On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:57:51 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> >>> On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: >>>> Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different >>>> frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for >>>> this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to >>>> previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new >>>> functionality: >>>> * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq >>>> * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's >>>> * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's >>>> * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers >>>> * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq >>>> * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation >>>> and some code refactoring >>> >>> Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch >>> cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. >>> >>> You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes >>> smoothly. >> >> I sent the patches out Mon but am struggling to get a satisfactory CI run >> from what it looks like are CI issues (CI runs were fine on previous >> versions). Will update after we have successful CI. Thanks. > > Hi Tvrtko, > > We now have CI results. They look good to me (except that there is a false > positive). In case you think this is good enough to merge these patches > now: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/#rev10 Pushed, with no conflicts even! :) Regards, Tvrtko