diff mbox series

[net-next,v5,10/11] igc: Check incompatible configs for Frame Preemption

Message ID 20220520011538.1098888-11-vinicius.gomes@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series ethtool: Add support for frame preemption | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: jesse.brandeburg@intel.com anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com pabeni@redhat.com edumazet@google.com kuba@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 3
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 11 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Vinicius Costa Gomes May 20, 2022, 1:15 a.m. UTC
Frame Preemption and LaunchTime cannot be enabled on the same queue.
If that situation happens, emit an error to the user, and log the
error.

Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

kernel test robot May 20, 2022, 6:11 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Vinicius,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vinicius-Costa-Gomes/ethtool-Add-support-for-frame-preemption/20220520-092800
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git df98714e432abf5cbdac3e4c1a13f94c65ddb8d3
config: s390-buildonly-randconfig-r002-20220519 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220520/202205201422.84XYwlpY-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e00cbbec06c08dc616a0d52a20f678b8fbd4e304)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/a42e940bc53c40ee4e33a1bbf022a663bb28a9c7
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Vinicius-Costa-Gomes/ethtool-Add-support-for-frame-preemption/20220520-092800
        git checkout a42e940bc53c40ee4e33a1bbf022a663bb28a9c7
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:6:
   In file included from include/linux/if_vlan.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:6:
   In file included from include/linux/if_vlan.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:6:
   In file included from include/linux/if_vlan.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:5919:6: warning: variable 'ring' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
           if (ring->preemptible) {
               ^~~~
   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:5914:23: note: initialize the variable 'ring' to silence this warning
           struct igc_ring *ring;
                                ^
                                 = NULL
   13 warnings generated.


vim +/ring +5919 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c

  5910	
  5911	static int igc_save_launchtime_params(struct igc_adapter *adapter, int queue,
  5912					      bool enable)
  5913	{
  5914		struct igc_ring *ring;
  5915	
  5916		if (queue < 0 || queue >= adapter->num_tx_queues)
  5917			return -EINVAL;
  5918	
> 5919		if (ring->preemptible) {
  5920			netdev_err(adapter->netdev, "Cannot enable LaunchTime on a preemptible queue\n");
  5921			return -EINVAL;
  5922		}
  5923	
  5924		ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue];
  5925		ring->launchtime_enable = enable;
  5926	
  5927		return 0;
  5928	}
  5929
Vladimir Oltean May 20, 2022, 11:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:15:37PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Frame Preemption and LaunchTime cannot be enabled on the same queue.
> If that situation happens, emit an error to the user, and log the
> error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index 69e96e9a3ec8..96ad00e33f4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -5916,6 +5916,11 @@ static int igc_save_launchtime_params(struct igc_adapter *adapter, int queue,
>  	if (queue < 0 || queue >= adapter->num_tx_queues)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (ring->preemptible) {
> +		netdev_err(adapter->netdev, "Cannot enable LaunchTime on a preemptible queue\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue];
>  	ring->launchtime_enable = enable;
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.3
>

I'm kind of concerned about this. I was thinking of adapting some
scripts I had into some functional kselftests for frame preemption.
I am sending 2 streams, one preemptable and one express. With SO_TXTIME
I am controlling their scheduled TX times, and I am forcing collisions
in the MAC merge layer by making the express packet have a scheduled TX
time equal to the preemptable packet's scheduled TX time, then I gradually
increase the express packet's scheduled time by small amounts (8 ns or so).
I take hardware TX timestamps of both packets and I plot when the express
packet is actually sent by the MAC. That is, I measure how long it takes
for the MAC to preempt and to reschedule the express packet.

My point is, if the LaunchTime feature cannot be enabled on preemptable
queues, how can I know that the igc does something functionally valid with
preemptable packets on TX, other than to reassemble the mPackets on RX?

Otherwise, if there isn't any other disagreement on the UAPI, would you
mind posting the iproute2 patch as well, so we could work in parallel
(me on enetc + the selftest) until net-next reopens? I'd like to write a
selftest that covers your hardware as well, but then again, not sure how
to cover it.

Do you have any sort of counters from the list in clause 30.14
Management for MAC Merge Sublayer? I see that structured ethtool counters
are becoming more popular, see struct ethtool_eth_mac_stats for example.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
index 69e96e9a3ec8..96ad00e33f4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
@@ -5916,6 +5916,11 @@  static int igc_save_launchtime_params(struct igc_adapter *adapter, int queue,
 	if (queue < 0 || queue >= adapter->num_tx_queues)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (ring->preemptible) {
+		netdev_err(adapter->netdev, "Cannot enable LaunchTime on a preemptible queue\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue];
 	ring->launchtime_enable = enable;