Message ID | 0a9aaac329f76ddb17df1786b001117823ffefa5.1653855302.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 330eb2a696f20ae019fa06d715cb01f165f8b328 |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next] bpf, test_run: Remove unnecessary prog type checks | expand |
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 1:16 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> wrote: > > These checks were effectively noops b/c there's only one way these > functions get called: through prog_ops dispatching. And since there's no > other callers, we can be sure that `prog` is always the correct type. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>: On Sun, 29 May 2022 15:15:41 -0500 you wrote: > These checks were effectively noops b/c there's only one way these > functions get called: through prog_ops dispatching. And since there's no > other callers, we can be sure that `prog` is always the correct type. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> > --- > net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] bpf, test_run: Remove unnecessary prog type checks https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/330eb2a696f2 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 56f059b3c242..2ca96acbc50a 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -1420,9 +1420,6 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *data; int ret; - if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) - return -EINVAL; - if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size) return -EINVAL; @@ -1487,9 +1484,6 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_sk_lookup(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kat u32 retval, duration; int ret = -EINVAL; - if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP) - return -EINVAL; - if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size) return -EINVAL;
These checks were effectively noops b/c there's only one way these functions get called: through prog_ops dispatching. And since there's no other callers, we can be sure that `prog` is always the correct type. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)