diff mbox series

[net,v5] net: ax25: Fix deadlock caused by skb_recv_datagram in ax25_recvmsg

Message ID 20220614092557.6713-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 219b51a6f040fa5367adadd7d58c4dda0896a01d
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,v5] net: ax25: Fix deadlock caused by skb_recv_datagram in ax25_recvmsg | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 8 of 8 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 53 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Duoming Zhou June 14, 2022, 9:25 a.m. UTC
The skb_recv_datagram() in ax25_recvmsg() will hold lock_sock
and block until it receives a packet from the remote. If the client
doesn`t connect to server and calls read() directly, it will not
receive any packets forever. As a result, the deadlock will happen.

The fail log caused by deadlock is shown below:

[  369.606973] INFO: task ax25_deadlock:157 blocked for more than 245 seconds.
[  369.608919] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  369.613058] Call Trace:
[  369.613315]  <TASK>
[  369.614072]  __schedule+0x2f9/0xb20
[  369.615029]  schedule+0x49/0xb0
[  369.615734]  __lock_sock+0x92/0x100
[  369.616763]  ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x20/0x20
[  369.617941]  lock_sock_nested+0x6e/0x70
[  369.618809]  ax25_bind+0xaa/0x210
[  369.619736]  __sys_bind+0xca/0xf0
[  369.620039]  ? do_futex+0xae/0x1b0
[  369.620387]  ? __x64_sys_futex+0x7c/0x1c0
[  369.620601]  ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x19/0x40
[  369.620613]  __x64_sys_bind+0x11/0x20
[  369.621791]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[  369.622423]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[  369.623319] RIP: 0033:0x7f43c8aa8af7
[  369.624301] RSP: 002b:00007f43c8197ef8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
[  369.625756] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f43c8aa8af7
[  369.626724] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055768e2021d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
[  369.628569] RBP: 00007f43c8197f00 R08: 0000000000000011 R09: 00007f43c8198700
[  369.630208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff845e6afe
[  369.632240] R13: 00007fff845e6aff R14: 00007f43c8197fc0 R15: 00007f43c8198700

This patch replaces skb_recv_datagram() with an open-coded variant of it
releasing the socket lock before the __skb_wait_for_more_packets() call
and re-acquiring it after such call in order that other functions that
need socket lock could be executed.

what's more, the socket lock will be released only when recvmsg() will
block and that should produce nicer overall behavior.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Thomas Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Reported-by: Thomas Habets <thomas@@habets.se>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v5:
  - Correct Fixes tag.

 net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Dumazet June 14, 2022, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 2:26 AM Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> The skb_recv_datagram() in ax25_recvmsg() will hold lock_sock
> and block until it receives a packet from the remote. If the client
> doesn`t connect to server and calls read() directly, it will not
> receive any packets forever. As a result, the deadlock will happen.
>
> The fail log caused by deadlock is shown below:
>
> This patch replaces skb_recv_datagram() with an open-coded variant of it
> releasing the socket lock before the __skb_wait_for_more_packets() call
> and re-acquiring it after such call in order that other functions that
> need socket lock could be executed.
>
> what's more, the socket lock will be released only when recvmsg() will
> block and that should produce nicer overall behavior.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Suggested-by: Thomas Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
> Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Thomas Habets <thomas@@habets.se>
> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org June 15, 2022, 12:20 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:25:57 +0800 you wrote:
> The skb_recv_datagram() in ax25_recvmsg() will hold lock_sock
> and block until it receives a packet from the remote. If the client
> doesn`t connect to server and calls read() directly, it will not
> receive any packets forever. As a result, the deadlock will happen.
> 
> The fail log caused by deadlock is shown below:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v5] net: ax25: Fix deadlock caused by skb_recv_datagram in ax25_recvmsg
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/219b51a6f040

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
index 95393bb2760..4c7030ed8d3 100644
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -1661,9 +1661,12 @@  static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 			int flags)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct sk_buff *skb, *last;
+	struct sk_buff_head *sk_queue;
 	int copied;
 	int err = 0;
+	int off = 0;
+	long timeo;
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	/*
@@ -1675,10 +1678,29 @@  static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/* Now we can treat all alike */
-	skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err);
-	if (skb == NULL)
-		goto out;
+	/*  We need support for non-blocking reads. */
+	sk_queue = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
+	skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, sk_queue, flags, &off, &err, &last);
+	/* If no packet is available, release_sock(sk) and try again. */
+	if (!skb) {
+		if (err != -EAGAIN)
+			goto out;
+		release_sock(sk);
+		timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+		while (timeo && !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, sk_queue, &err,
+							     &timeo, last)) {
+			skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, sk_queue, flags, &off,
+						      &err, &last);
+			if (skb)
+				break;
+
+			if (err != -EAGAIN)
+				goto done;
+		}
+		if (!skb)
+			goto done;
+		lock_sock(sk);
+	}
 
 	if (!sk_to_ax25(sk)->pidincl)
 		skb_pull(skb, 1);		/* Remove PID */
@@ -1725,6 +1747,7 @@  static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
 
+done:
 	return err;
 }