Message ID | 20220616210518.125287-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | hugetlb: speed up linear address scanning | expand |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > HugeTLB address ranges are linearly scanned during fork, unmap and > remap operations. If a non-present entry is encountered, the code > currently continues to the next huge page aligned address. However, > a non-present entry implies that the page table page for that entry > is not present. Therefore, the linear scan can skip to the end of > range mapped by the page table page. This can speed operations on > large sparsely populated hugetlb mappings. > > Create a new routine hugetlb_mask_last_page() that will return an > address mask. When the mask is ORed with an address, the result > will be the address of the last huge page mapped by the associated > page table page. Use this mask to update addresses in routines which > linearly scan hugetlb address ranges when a non-present pte is > encountered. > > hugetlb_mask_last_page is related to the implementation of > huge_pte_offset as hugetlb_mask_last_page is called when huge_pte_offset > returns NULL. This patch only provides a complete hugetlb_mask_last_page > implementation when CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB is defined. > Architectures which provide their own versions of huge_pte_offset can also > provide their own version of hugetlb_mask_last_page. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> > Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> It'll be more efficient, Thanks. Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Hi Mike, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc2 next-20220617] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm/for-next kvmarm/next xilinx-xlnx/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next config: i386-randconfig-a002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220617/202206171929.ZIUrNg6p-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f0e608de27b3d568000046eebf3712ab542979d6) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 git checkout 4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/hugetlb.c:6901:7: error: duplicate case value '4194304' case PUD_SIZE: ^ include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE' #define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT) ^ mm/hugetlb.c:6899:7: note: previous case defined here case P4D_SIZE: ^ include/asm-generic/pgtable-nop4d.h:13:19: note: expanded from macro 'P4D_SIZE' #define P4D_SIZE (1UL << P4D_SHIFT) ^ mm/hugetlb.c:6903:7: error: duplicate case value '4194304' case PMD_SIZE: ^ include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE' #define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT) ^ mm/hugetlb.c:6901:7: note: previous case defined here case PUD_SIZE: ^ include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE' #define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT) ^ 2 errors generated. vim +/4194304 +6901 mm/hugetlb.c 6886 6887 /* 6888 * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge 6889 * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present 6890 * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures 6891 * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own 6892 * version of this routine. 6893 */ 6894 unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) 6895 { 6896 unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); 6897 6898 switch (hp_size) { 6899 case P4D_SIZE: 6900 return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; > 6901 case PUD_SIZE: 6902 return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; 6903 case PMD_SIZE: 6904 return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; 6905 default: 6906 break; /* Should never happen */ 6907 } 6908 6909 return ~(0UL); 6910 } 6911
Hi, Mike, On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > @@ -6877,6 +6896,39 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, > return (pte_t *)pmd; > } > > +/* > + * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge > + * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present > + * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures > + * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own > + * version of this routine. > + */ > +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) > +{ > + unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); > + > + switch (hp_size) { > + case P4D_SIZE: > + return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; > + case PUD_SIZE: > + return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; > + case PMD_SIZE: > + return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; > + default: Should we add a WARN_ON_ONCE() if it should never trigger? > + break; /* Should never happen */ > + } > + > + return ~(0UL); > +} > + > +#else > + > +/* See description above. Architectures can provide their own version. */ > +__weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) > +{ > + return ~(0UL); I'm wondering whether it's better to return 0 rather than ~0 by default. Could an arch with !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB wrongly skip some valid address ranges with ~0, or perhaps I misread? Thanks,
Hi Peter, On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 4:22 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > @@ -6877,6 +6896,39 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, > > return (pte_t *)pmd; > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge > > + * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present > > + * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures > > + * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own > > + * version of this routine. > > + */ > > +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) > > +{ > > + unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); > > + > > + switch (hp_size) { > > + case P4D_SIZE: > > + return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; > > + case PUD_SIZE: > > + return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; > > + case PMD_SIZE: > > + return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; > > + default: > > Should we add a WARN_ON_ONCE() if it should never trigger? And with panic_on_warn, it'll panic only once ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Mike, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc2 next-20220617] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm/for-next kvmarm/next xilinx-xlnx/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next config: i386-debian-10.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220618/202206180021.rcc4B1by-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 git checkout 4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'hugetlb_mask_last_page': >> mm/hugetlb.c:6901:9: error: duplicate case value 6901 | case PUD_SIZE: | ^~~~ mm/hugetlb.c:6899:9: note: previously used here 6899 | case P4D_SIZE: | ^~~~ vim +6901 mm/hugetlb.c 6886 6887 /* 6888 * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge 6889 * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present 6890 * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures 6891 * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own 6892 * version of this routine. 6893 */ 6894 unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) 6895 { 6896 unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); 6897 6898 switch (hp_size) { 6899 case P4D_SIZE: 6900 return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; > 6901 case PUD_SIZE: 6902 return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; 6903 case PMD_SIZE: 6904 return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; 6905 default: 6906 break; /* Should never happen */ 6907 } 6908 6909 return ~(0UL); 6910 } 6911
On 06/17/22 10:15, Peter Xu wrote: > Hi, Mike, > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > @@ -6877,6 +6896,39 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, > > return (pte_t *)pmd; > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge > > + * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present > > + * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures > > + * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own > > + * version of this routine. > > + */ > > +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) > > +{ > > + unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); > > + > > + switch (hp_size) { > > + case P4D_SIZE: > > + return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; > > + case PUD_SIZE: > > + return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; > > + case PMD_SIZE: > > + return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; > > + default: > > Should we add a WARN_ON_ONCE() if it should never trigger? > Sure. I will add this. > > + break; /* Should never happen */ > > + } > > + > > + return ~(0UL); > > +} > > + > > +#else > > + > > +/* See description above. Architectures can provide their own version. */ > > +__weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) > > +{ > > + return ~(0UL); > > I'm wondering whether it's better to return 0 rather than ~0 by default. > Could an arch with !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB wrongly skip some > valid address ranges with ~0, or perhaps I misread? Thank you, thank you, thank you Peter! Yes, the 'default' return for hugetlb_mask_last_page() should be 0. If there is no 'optimization', we do not want to modify the address so we want to OR with 0 not ~0. My bad, I must have been thinking AND instead of OR. I will change here as well as in Baolin's patch.
On 06/17/22 19:26, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc2 next-20220617] > [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm/for-next kvmarm/next xilinx-xlnx/master] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next > config: i386-randconfig-a002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220617/202206171929.ZIUrNg6p-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f0e608de27b3d568000046eebf3712ab542979d6) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mike-Kravetz/hugetlb-speed-up-linear-address-scanning/20220617-050726 > git checkout 4c647687607f10fece04967b8180c0dadaf765e6 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): A couple of things here, > > >> mm/hugetlb.c:6901:7: error: duplicate case value '4194304' > case PUD_SIZE: > ^ > include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE' > #define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT) > ^ > mm/hugetlb.c:6899:7: note: previous case defined here > case P4D_SIZE: > ^ > include/asm-generic/pgtable-nop4d.h:13:19: note: expanded from macro 'P4D_SIZE' > #define P4D_SIZE (1UL << P4D_SHIFT) In the CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB case covered by this version of hugetlb_mask_last_page, huge pages can only be PMD_SIZE or PUD_SIZE. So, the 'case P4D_SIZE:' should not exist and can be removed. > ^ > mm/hugetlb.c:6903:7: error: duplicate case value '4194304' > case PMD_SIZE: > ^ > include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE' > #define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT) > ^ On i386 with CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=2, PUD_SIZE == PMD_SIZE. Originally, I coded this as a if .. else if ... statement instead of a switch. If coded this way, the compiler does not complain about the duplicate values. The only other alternative I can think of is something like '#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2' around the PUD_SIZE case. I would prefer the if else if, unless someone can suggest something else?
On 6/18/2022 1:17 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 06/17/22 10:15, Peter Xu wrote: >> Hi, Mike, >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:05:15PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: >>> @@ -6877,6 +6896,39 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, >>> return (pte_t *)pmd; >>> } >>> >>> +/* >>> + * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge >>> + * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present >>> + * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures >>> + * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own >>> + * version of this routine. >>> + */ >>> +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) >>> +{ >>> + unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); >>> + >>> + switch (hp_size) { >>> + case P4D_SIZE: >>> + return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; >>> + case PUD_SIZE: >>> + return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; >>> + case PMD_SIZE: >>> + return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; >>> + default: >> >> Should we add a WARN_ON_ONCE() if it should never trigger? >> > > Sure. I will add this. > >>> + break; /* Should never happen */ >>> + } >>> + >>> + return ~(0UL); >>> +} >>> + >>> +#else >>> + >>> +/* See description above. Architectures can provide their own version. */ >>> +__weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) >>> +{ >>> + return ~(0UL); >> >> I'm wondering whether it's better to return 0 rather than ~0 by default. >> Could an arch with !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB wrongly skip some >> valid address ranges with ~0, or perhaps I misread? > > Thank you, thank you, thank you Peter! > > Yes, the 'default' return for hugetlb_mask_last_page() should be 0. If > there is no 'optimization', we do not want to modify the address so we > want to OR with 0 not ~0. My bad, I must have been thinking AND instead > of OR. > > I will change here as well as in Baolin's patch. Ah, I also overlooked this. Thanks Peter, and thanks Mike for updating.
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h index 642a39016f9a..e37465e830fe 100644 --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz); pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz); +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h); int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long *addr, pte_t *ptep); void adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(struct vm_area_struct *vma, diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 259b9c41892f..7c4a82848603 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4740,6 +4740,7 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, unsigned long npages = pages_per_huge_page(h); struct address_space *mapping = src_vma->vm_file->f_mapping; struct mmu_notifier_range range; + unsigned long last_addr_mask; int ret = 0; if (cow) { @@ -4759,11 +4760,14 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, i_mmap_lock_read(mapping); } + last_addr_mask = hugetlb_mask_last_page(h); for (addr = src_vma->vm_start; addr < src_vma->vm_end; addr += sz) { spinlock_t *src_ptl, *dst_ptl; src_pte = huge_pte_offset(src, addr, sz); - if (!src_pte) + if (!src_pte) { + addr |= last_addr_mask; continue; + } dst_pte = huge_pte_alloc(dst, dst_vma, addr, sz); if (!dst_pte) { ret = -ENOMEM; @@ -4780,8 +4784,10 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src, * after taking the lock below. */ dst_entry = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte); - if ((dst_pte == src_pte) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry)) + if ((dst_pte == src_pte) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry)) { + addr |= last_addr_mask; continue; + } dst_ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, dst, dst_pte); src_ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(h, src, src_pte); @@ -4942,6 +4948,7 @@ int move_hugetlb_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long sz = huge_page_size(h); struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; unsigned long old_end = old_addr + len; + unsigned long last_addr_mask; unsigned long old_addr_copy; pte_t *src_pte, *dst_pte; struct mmu_notifier_range range; @@ -4957,12 +4964,16 @@ int move_hugetlb_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma, flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end); mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); + last_addr_mask = hugetlb_mask_last_page(h); /* Prevent race with file truncation */ i_mmap_lock_write(mapping); for (; old_addr < old_end; old_addr += sz, new_addr += sz) { src_pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, old_addr, sz); - if (!src_pte) + if (!src_pte) { + old_addr |= last_addr_mask; + new_addr |= last_addr_mask; continue; + } if (huge_pte_none(huge_ptep_get(src_pte))) continue; @@ -5007,6 +5018,7 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma); unsigned long sz = huge_page_size(h); struct mmu_notifier_range range; + unsigned long last_addr_mask; bool force_flush = false; WARN_ON(!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)); @@ -5027,11 +5039,14 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct end); adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &range.start, &range.end); mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); + last_addr_mask = hugetlb_mask_last_page(h); address = start; for (; address < end; address += sz) { ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, sz); - if (!ptep) + if (!ptep) { + address |= last_addr_mask; continue; + } ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep); if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, ptep)) { @@ -6305,6 +6320,7 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long pages = 0, psize = huge_page_size(h); bool shared_pmd = false; struct mmu_notifier_range range; + unsigned long last_addr_mask; bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP; bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE; @@ -6321,12 +6337,15 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma, flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end); mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); + last_addr_mask = hugetlb_mask_last_page(h); i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping); for (; address < end; address += psize) { spinlock_t *ptl; ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, psize); - if (!ptep) + if (!ptep) { + address |= last_addr_mask; continue; + } ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep); if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, ptep)) { /* @@ -6877,6 +6896,39 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, return (pte_t *)pmd; } +/* + * Return a mask that can be used to update an address to the last huge + * page in a page table page mapping size. Used to skip non-present + * page table entries when linearly scanning address ranges. Architectures + * with unique huge page to page table relationships can define their own + * version of this routine. + */ +unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) +{ + unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); + + switch (hp_size) { + case P4D_SIZE: + return PGDIR_SIZE - P4D_SIZE; + case PUD_SIZE: + return P4D_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; + case PMD_SIZE: + return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; + default: + break; /* Should never happen */ + } + + return ~(0UL); +} + +#else + +/* See description above. Architectures can provide their own version. */ +__weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) +{ + return ~(0UL); +} + #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB */ /*