diff mbox series

[net-next:,11/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: switch to device_/fwnode_ APIs

Message ID 20220620150225.1307946-12-mw@semihalf.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series ACPI support for DSA | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 9 of 9 maintainers
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Marcin Wojtas June 20, 2022, 3:02 p.m. UTC 
In order to support both ACPI and DT, modify the generic
DSA code to use device_/fwnode_ equivalent routines.
No functional change is introduced by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 53 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 20, 2022, 6 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> In order to support both ACPI and DT, modify the generic
> DSA code to use device_/fwnode_ equivalent routines.
> No functional change is introduced by this patch.

...

>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (!np && !pdata)
> +	if (!fwnode && !pdata)
>  		return -EINVAL;

Sounds like redundant check

	if (pdata)
		...
	else
		compat_info = ...
	if (!compat_info)
		return -EINVAL

?

> -	if (np)
> -		compat_info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (fwnode)
> +		compat_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
>  
>  	if (pdata) {

Missed 'else' even in the original code (see above)?

>  		compat_info = pdata_device_get_match_data(dev);
Andy Shevchenko June 20, 2022, 6:04 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> In order to support both ACPI and DT, modify the generic
> DSA code to use device_/fwnode_ equivalent routines.
> No functional change is introduced by this patch.

...

> @@ -6962,16 +6963,16 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
>  	struct dsa_mv88e6xxx_pdata *pdata = mdiodev->dev.platform_data;
>  	const struct mv88e6xxx_info *compat_info = NULL;
>  	struct device *dev = &mdiodev->dev;
> -	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev->fwnode;

Forgot to mention: dev_fwnode() or respective device_property_ API, please.
Marcin Wojtas June 21, 2022, 9:14 a.m. UTC | #3 
pon., 20 cze 2022 o 20:03 Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > In order to support both ACPI and DT, modify the generic
> > DSA code to use device_/fwnode_ equivalent routines.
> > No functional change is introduced by this patch.
>
> ...
>
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     if (!np && !pdata)
> > +     if (!fwnode && !pdata)
> >               return -EINVAL;
>
> Sounds like redundant check
>
>         if (pdata)
>                 ...
>         else
>                 compat_info = ...
>         if (!compat_info)
>                 return -EINVAL
>
> ?
>
> > -     if (np)
> > -             compat_info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +     if (fwnode)
> > +             compat_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> >
> >       if (pdata) {
>
> Missed 'else' even in the original code (see above)?
>

fwnode/np is mutually exclusive with pdata, but imo nothing wrong with
adding 'else' here or update the condition as suggested above.

Thanks,
Marcin


> >               compat_info = pdata_device_get_match_data(dev);
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Marcin Wojtas June 21, 2022, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #4 
pon., 20 cze 2022 o 20:04 Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > In order to support both ACPI and DT, modify the generic
> > DSA code to use device_/fwnode_ equivalent routines.
> > No functional change is introduced by this patch.
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -6962,16 +6963,16 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> >       struct dsa_mv88e6xxx_pdata *pdata = mdiodev->dev.platform_data;
> >       const struct mv88e6xxx_info *compat_info = NULL;
> >       struct device *dev = &mdiodev->dev;
> > -     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > +     struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev->fwnode;
>
> Forgot to mention: dev_fwnode() or respective device_property_ API, please.
>

I'll update changes to use the device_property_ API.

Thanks,
Marcin
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 0b49d243e00b..556defa4379d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -3278,7 +3278,7 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
 {
-	struct device_node *phy_handle = NULL;
+	struct fwnode_handle *phy_handle = NULL;
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = chip->ds;
 	struct dsa_port *dp;
 	int tx_amp;
@@ -3475,15 +3475,15 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
 	if (chip->info->ops->serdes_set_tx_amplitude) {
 		dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
 		if (dp)
-			phy_handle = of_parse_phandle(dp->dn, "phy-handle", 0);
+			phy_handle = fwnode_find_reference(dp->fwnode, "phy-handle", 0);
 
-		if (phy_handle && !of_property_read_u32(phy_handle,
-							"tx-p2p-microvolt",
-							&tx_amp))
+		if (!IS_ERR(phy_handle) && !fwnode_property_read_u32(phy_handle,
+								     "tx-p2p-microvolt",
+								     &tx_amp))
 			err = chip->info->ops->serdes_set_tx_amplitude(chip,
 								port, tx_amp);
-		if (phy_handle) {
-			of_node_put(phy_handle);
+		if (!IS_ERR(phy_handle)) {
+			fwnode_handle_put(phy_handle);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		}
@@ -3867,10 +3867,11 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy, int reg, u16 val)
 }
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_mdio_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
-				   struct device_node *np,
+				   struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 				   bool external)
 {
 	static int index;
+	struct device_node *np = to_of_node(fwnode);
 	struct mv88e6xxx_mdio_bus *mdio_bus;
 	struct mii_bus *bus;
 	int err;
@@ -3949,18 +3950,18 @@  static void mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 }
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
-				    struct device_node *np)
+				    struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 {
-	struct device_node *child;
+	struct fwnode_handle *child;
 	int err;
 
 	/* Always register one mdio bus for the internal/default mdio
 	 * bus. This maybe represented in the device tree, but is
 	 * optional.
 	 */
-	child = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
+	child = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "mdio");
 	err = mv88e6xxx_mdio_register(chip, child, false);
-	of_node_put(child);
+	fwnode_handle_put(child);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -3968,13 +3969,13 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 	 * which say they are compatible with the external mdio
 	 * bus.
 	 */
-	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
-		if (of_device_is_compatible(
-			    child, "marvell,mv88e6xxx-mdio-external")) {
+	fwnode_for_each_available_child_node(fwnode, child) {
+		if (fwnode_property_match_string(child, "compatible",
+						 "marvell,mv88e6xxx-mdio-external") == 0) {
 			err = mv88e6xxx_mdio_register(chip, child, true);
 			if (err) {
 				mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
-				of_node_put(child);
+				fwnode_handle_put(child);
 				return err;
 			}
 		}
@@ -6962,16 +6963,16 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
 	struct dsa_mv88e6xxx_pdata *pdata = mdiodev->dev.platform_data;
 	const struct mv88e6xxx_info *compat_info = NULL;
 	struct device *dev = &mdiodev->dev;
-	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev->fwnode;
 	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip;
 	int port;
 	int err;
 
-	if (!np && !pdata)
+	if (!fwnode && !pdata)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (np)
-		compat_info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (fwnode)
+		compat_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
 
 	if (pdata) {
 		compat_info = pdata_device_get_match_data(dev);
@@ -7030,9 +7031,9 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
 	mv88e6xxx_phy_init(chip);
 
 	if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom) {
-		if (np)
-			of_property_read_u32(np, "eeprom-length",
-					     &chip->eeprom_len);
+		if (fwnode)
+			device_property_read_u32(dev, "eeprom-length",
+						 &chip->eeprom_len);
 		else
 			chip->eeprom_len = pdata->eeprom_len;
 	}
@@ -7043,8 +7044,8 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (np) {
-		chip->irq = of_irq_get(np, 0);
+	if (fwnode) {
+		chip->irq = fwnode_irq_get(fwnode, 0);
 		if (chip->irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
 			err = chip->irq;
 			goto out;
@@ -7082,7 +7083,7 @@  static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
 	if (err)
 		goto out_g1_atu_prob_irq;
 
-	err = mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(chip, np);
+	err = mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(chip, fwnode);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_g1_vtu_prob_irq;