| Message ID | 20220629065656.54420-9-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | virtio pci support VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply |
在 2022/6/29 14:56, Xuan Zhuo 写道: > Separate the logic of split to create vring queue. > > This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring. > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index 49d61e412dc6..a9ceb9c16c54 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -949,28 +949,19 @@ static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > kfree(vring->desc_extra); > } > > -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > - unsigned int index, > - unsigned int num, > - unsigned int vring_align, > - struct virtio_device *vdev, > - bool weak_barriers, > - bool may_reduce_num, > - bool context, > - bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > - void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > - const char *name) > +static int vring_alloc_queue_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > + struct virtio_device *vdev, > + u32 num, > + unsigned int vring_align, > + bool may_reduce_num) > { > - struct virtqueue *vq; > void *queue = NULL; > dma_addr_t dma_addr; > - size_t queue_size_in_bytes; > - struct vring vring; > > /* We assume num is a power of 2. */ > if (num & (num - 1)) { > dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num); > - return NULL; > + return -EINVAL; > } > > /* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */ > @@ -981,11 +972,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > if (queue) > break; > if (!may_reduce_num) > - return NULL; > + return -ENOMEM; > } > > if (!num) > - return NULL; > + return -ENOMEM; > > if (!queue) { > /* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */ > @@ -993,21 +984,46 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); > } > if (!queue) > - return NULL; > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align); > > - queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > - vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align); > + vring->queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > + vring->queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > + unsigned int index, > + unsigned int num, > + unsigned int vring_align, > + struct virtio_device *vdev, > + bool weak_barriers, > + bool may_reduce_num, > + bool context, > + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > + void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > + const char *name) > +{ > + struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {}; > + struct virtqueue *vq; > + int err; > + > + err = vring_alloc_queue_split(&vring, vdev, num, vring_align, > + may_reduce_num); > + if (err) > + return NULL; > > - vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context, > - notify, callback, name); > + vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, > + context, notify, callback, name); > if (!vq) { > - vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue, > - dma_addr); > + vring_free_split(&vring, vdev); > return NULL; > } > > - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes; > + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.queue_dma_addr; Nit: having two queue_dma_addr seems redundant (so did queue_size_in_bytes). Thanks > + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes; > to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true; > > return vq;
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:26:25 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: > > 在 2022/6/29 14:56, Xuan Zhuo 写道: > > Separate the logic of split to create vring queue. > > > > This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > > --- > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > index 49d61e412dc6..a9ceb9c16c54 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > @@ -949,28 +949,19 @@ static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > > kfree(vring->desc_extra); > > } > > > > -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > > - unsigned int index, > > - unsigned int num, > > - unsigned int vring_align, > > - struct virtio_device *vdev, > > - bool weak_barriers, > > - bool may_reduce_num, > > - bool context, > > - bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > > - void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > > - const char *name) > > +static int vring_alloc_queue_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > > + struct virtio_device *vdev, > > + u32 num, > > + unsigned int vring_align, > > + bool may_reduce_num) > > { > > - struct virtqueue *vq; > > void *queue = NULL; > > dma_addr_t dma_addr; > > - size_t queue_size_in_bytes; > > - struct vring vring; > > > > /* We assume num is a power of 2. */ > > if (num & (num - 1)) { > > dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num); > > - return NULL; > > + return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > /* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */ > > @@ -981,11 +972,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > > if (queue) > > break; > > if (!may_reduce_num) > > - return NULL; > > + return -ENOMEM; > > } > > > > if (!num) > > - return NULL; > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > if (!queue) { > > /* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */ > > @@ -993,21 +984,46 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > > &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); > > } > > if (!queue) > > - return NULL; > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align); > > > > - queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > > - vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align); > > + vring->queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > > + vring->queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > > + unsigned int index, > > + unsigned int num, > > + unsigned int vring_align, > > + struct virtio_device *vdev, > > + bool weak_barriers, > > + bool may_reduce_num, > > + bool context, > > + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > > + void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > > + const char *name) > > +{ > > + struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {}; > > + struct virtqueue *vq; > > + int err; > > + > > + err = vring_alloc_queue_split(&vring, vdev, num, vring_align, > > + may_reduce_num); > > + if (err) > > + return NULL; > > > > - vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context, > > - notify, callback, name); > > + vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, > > + context, notify, callback, name); > > if (!vq) { > > - vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue, > > - dma_addr); > > + vring_free_split(&vring, vdev); > > return NULL; > > } > > > > - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > > - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes; > > + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.queue_dma_addr; > > > Nit: having two queue_dma_addr seems redundant (so did queue_size_in_bytes). two? Where is the problem I don't understand? Thanks. > > Thanks > > > > + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes; > > to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true; > > > > return vq; >
在 2022/7/1 16:45, Xuan Zhuo 写道: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:26:25 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: >> 在 2022/6/29 14:56, Xuan Zhuo 写道: >>> Separate the logic of split to create vring queue. >>> >>> This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> index 49d61e412dc6..a9ceb9c16c54 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> @@ -949,28 +949,19 @@ static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, >>> kfree(vring->desc_extra); >>> } >>> >>> -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( >>> - unsigned int index, >>> - unsigned int num, >>> - unsigned int vring_align, >>> - struct virtio_device *vdev, >>> - bool weak_barriers, >>> - bool may_reduce_num, >>> - bool context, >>> - bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), >>> - void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), >>> - const char *name) >>> +static int vring_alloc_queue_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, >>> + struct virtio_device *vdev, >>> + u32 num, >>> + unsigned int vring_align, >>> + bool may_reduce_num) >>> { >>> - struct virtqueue *vq; >>> void *queue = NULL; >>> dma_addr_t dma_addr; >>> - size_t queue_size_in_bytes; >>> - struct vring vring; >>> >>> /* We assume num is a power of 2. */ >>> if (num & (num - 1)) { >>> dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num); >>> - return NULL; >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> /* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */ >>> @@ -981,11 +972,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( >>> if (queue) >>> break; >>> if (!may_reduce_num) >>> - return NULL; >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> } >>> >>> if (!num) >>> - return NULL; >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> >>> if (!queue) { >>> /* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */ >>> @@ -993,21 +984,46 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( >>> &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); >>> } >>> if (!queue) >>> - return NULL; >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> + vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align); >>> >>> - queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); >>> - vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align); >>> + vring->queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; >>> + vring->queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( >>> + unsigned int index, >>> + unsigned int num, >>> + unsigned int vring_align, >>> + struct virtio_device *vdev, >>> + bool weak_barriers, >>> + bool may_reduce_num, >>> + bool context, >>> + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), >>> + void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), >>> + const char *name) >>> +{ >>> + struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {}; >>> + struct virtqueue *vq; >>> + int err; >>> + >>> + err = vring_alloc_queue_split(&vring, vdev, num, vring_align, >>> + may_reduce_num); >>> + if (err) >>> + return NULL; >>> >>> - vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context, >>> - notify, callback, name); >>> + vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, >>> + context, notify, callback, name); >>> if (!vq) { >>> - vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue, >>> - dma_addr); >>> + vring_free_split(&vring, vdev); >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> >>> - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; >>> - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes; >>> + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.queue_dma_addr; >> >> Nit: having two queue_dma_addr seems redundant (so did queue_size_in_bytes). > two? > > Where is the problem I don't understand? > > Thanks. I meant we had: vring.vring = _vring; in __vring_new_virtqueue(). This means we'd better initialize vring fully before that? E.g vring.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; ... __vring_new_virtqueue() Thanks > >> Thanks >> >> >>> + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes; >>> to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true; >>> >>> return vq;
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:59:03 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: > > 在 2022/7/1 16:45, Xuan Zhuo 写道: > > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:26:25 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: > >> 在 2022/6/29 14:56, Xuan Zhuo 写道: > >>> Separate the logic of split to create vring queue. > >>> > >>> This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > >>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >>> index 49d61e412dc6..a9ceb9c16c54 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >>> @@ -949,28 +949,19 @@ static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > >>> kfree(vring->desc_extra); > >>> } > >>> > >>> -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > >>> - unsigned int index, > >>> - unsigned int num, > >>> - unsigned int vring_align, > >>> - struct virtio_device *vdev, > >>> - bool weak_barriers, > >>> - bool may_reduce_num, > >>> - bool context, > >>> - bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > >>> - void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > >>> - const char *name) > >>> +static int vring_alloc_queue_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, > >>> + struct virtio_device *vdev, > >>> + u32 num, > >>> + unsigned int vring_align, > >>> + bool may_reduce_num) > >>> { > >>> - struct virtqueue *vq; > >>> void *queue = NULL; > >>> dma_addr_t dma_addr; > >>> - size_t queue_size_in_bytes; > >>> - struct vring vring; > >>> > >>> /* We assume num is a power of 2. */ > >>> if (num & (num - 1)) { > >>> dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num); > >>> - return NULL; > >>> + return -EINVAL; > >>> } > >>> > >>> /* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */ > >>> @@ -981,11 +972,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > >>> if (queue) > >>> break; > >>> if (!may_reduce_num) > >>> - return NULL; > >>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>> } > >>> > >>> if (!num) > >>> - return NULL; > >>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>> > >>> if (!queue) { > >>> /* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */ > >>> @@ -993,21 +984,46 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > >>> &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); > >>> } > >>> if (!queue) > >>> - return NULL; > >>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>> + > >>> + vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align); > >>> > >>> - queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > >>> - vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align); > >>> + vring->queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > >>> + vring->queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( > >>> + unsigned int index, > >>> + unsigned int num, > >>> + unsigned int vring_align, > >>> + struct virtio_device *vdev, > >>> + bool weak_barriers, > >>> + bool may_reduce_num, > >>> + bool context, > >>> + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), > >>> + void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), > >>> + const char *name) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {}; > >>> + struct virtqueue *vq; > >>> + int err; > >>> + > >>> + err = vring_alloc_queue_split(&vring, vdev, num, vring_align, > >>> + may_reduce_num); > >>> + if (err) > >>> + return NULL; > >>> > >>> - vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context, > >>> - notify, callback, name); > >>> + vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, > >>> + context, notify, callback, name); > >>> if (!vq) { > >>> - vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue, > >>> - dma_addr); > >>> + vring_free_split(&vring, vdev); > >>> return NULL; > >>> } > >>> > >>> - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > >>> - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes; > >>> + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.queue_dma_addr; > >> > >> Nit: having two queue_dma_addr seems redundant (so did queue_size_in_bytes). > > two? > > > > Where is the problem I don't understand? > > > > Thanks. > > > I meant we had: > > vring.vring = _vring; > > in __vring_new_virtqueue(). > > This means we'd better initialize vring fully before that? > > E.g > > vring.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; > > ... > > __vring_new_virtqueue() oh, my bad, maybe the repeated use of the name "vring" led to a misunderstanding. What is passed to __vring_new_virtqueue is the structure struct vring struct vring { unsigned int num; vring_desc_t *desc; vring_avail_t *avail; vring_used_t *used; }; And what contains queue_dma_addr is our newly split structure struct vring_virtqueue_split struct vring_virtqueue_split { /* Actual memory layout for this queue. */ struct vring vring; /* Last written value to avail->flags */ u16 avail_flags_shadow; /* * Last written value to avail->idx in * guest byte order. */ u16 avail_idx_shadow; /* Per-descriptor state. */ struct vring_desc_state_split *desc_state; struct vring_desc_extra *desc_extra; /* DMA address and size information */ dma_addr_t queue_dma_addr; size_t queue_size_in_bytes; /* * The parameters for creating vrings are reserved for creating new * vring. */ u32 vring_align; bool may_reduce_num; }; We have no way to pass queue_dma_addr into __vring_new_virtqueue. But for the uniformity of the interface, I create a temporary struct vring_virtqueue_split vring_split(your suggestion) in __vring_new_virtqueue. Then assign the passed in struct vring to it vring.vring = _vring. So here vring is an empty temporary variable. As you have replied in other patches, my re-use of the name vring is a mistake, I will change some places to vring_split and vring_packed. Thanks. > > Thanks > > > > > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >>> + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes; > >>> to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true; > >>> > >>> return vq; >
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 49d61e412dc6..a9ceb9c16c54 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c @@ -949,28 +949,19 @@ static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, kfree(vring->desc_extra); } -static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( - unsigned int index, - unsigned int num, - unsigned int vring_align, - struct virtio_device *vdev, - bool weak_barriers, - bool may_reduce_num, - bool context, - bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), - void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), - const char *name) +static int vring_alloc_queue_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring, + struct virtio_device *vdev, + u32 num, + unsigned int vring_align, + bool may_reduce_num) { - struct virtqueue *vq; void *queue = NULL; dma_addr_t dma_addr; - size_t queue_size_in_bytes; - struct vring vring; /* We assume num is a power of 2. */ if (num & (num - 1)) { dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num); - return NULL; + return -EINVAL; } /* TODO: allocate each queue chunk individually */ @@ -981,11 +972,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( if (queue) break; if (!may_reduce_num) - return NULL; + return -ENOMEM; } if (!num) - return NULL; + return -ENOMEM; if (!queue) { /* Try to get a single page. You are my only hope! */ @@ -993,21 +984,46 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO); } if (!queue) - return NULL; + return -ENOMEM; + + vring_init(&vring->vring, num, queue, vring_align); - queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); - vring_init(&vring, num, queue, vring_align); + vring->queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; + vring->queue_size_in_bytes = vring_size(num, vring_align); + + return 0; +} + +static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_split( + unsigned int index, + unsigned int num, + unsigned int vring_align, + struct virtio_device *vdev, + bool weak_barriers, + bool may_reduce_num, + bool context, + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *), + void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *), + const char *name) +{ + struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {}; + struct virtqueue *vq; + int err; + + err = vring_alloc_queue_split(&vring, vdev, num, vring_align, + may_reduce_num); + if (err) + return NULL; - vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring, vdev, weak_barriers, context, - notify, callback, name); + vq = __vring_new_virtqueue(index, vring.vring, vdev, weak_barriers, + context, notify, callback, name); if (!vq) { - vring_free_queue(vdev, queue_size_in_bytes, queue, - dma_addr); + vring_free_split(&vring, vdev); return NULL; } - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = dma_addr; - to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = queue_size_in_bytes; + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_dma_addr = vring.queue_dma_addr; + to_vvq(vq)->split.queue_size_in_bytes = vring.queue_size_in_bytes; to_vvq(vq)->we_own_ring = true; return vq;
Separate the logic of split to create vring queue. This feature is required for subsequent virtuqueue reset vring. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)