diff mbox series

[net-next,v3] net: ip6mr: add RTM_GETROUTE netlink op

Message ID 20220704105223.395359-1-equinox@diac24.net (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net-next,v3] net: ip6mr: add RTM_GETROUTE netlink op | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org pabeni@redhat.com kuba@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 4
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

David Lamparter July 4, 2022, 10:52 a.m. UTC
The IPv6 multicast routing code previously implemented only the dump
variant of RTM_GETROUTE.  Implement single MFC item retrieval by copying
and adapting the respective IPv4 code.

Tested against FRRouting's IPv6 PIM stack.

Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
---

v3: reorder/remove some redundant bits, fix style.  Thanks Nikolay for
pointing them out.  The "extra" validation loop is still there for the
time being;  happy to drop it if that's the consensus.

v2: changeover to strict netlink attribute parsing.  Doing so actually
exposed a bunch of other issues, first and foremost that rtm_ipv6_policy
does not have RTA_SRC or RTA_DST.  This made reusing that policy rather
pointless so I changed it to use a separate rtm_ipv6_mr_policy.

Thanks again dsahern@ for the feedback on the previous version!

---
 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski July 5, 2022, 2:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon,  4 Jul 2022 12:52:23 +0200 David Lamparter wrote:
> +const struct nla_policy rtm_ipv6_mr_policy[RTA_MAX + 1] = {
> +	[RTA_SRC]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
> +	[RTA_DST]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
> +	[RTA_TABLE]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +};

net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:2515:25: warning: symbol 'rtm_ipv6_mr_policy' was not declared. Should it be static?
David Lamparter July 6, 2022, 9:52 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 07:50:11PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Jul 2022 12:52:23 +0200 David Lamparter wrote:
> > +const struct nla_policy rtm_ipv6_mr_policy[RTA_MAX + 1] = {
> > +	[RTA_SRC]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
> > +	[RTA_DST]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
> > +	[RTA_TABLE]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > +};
> 
> net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:2515:25: warning: symbol 'rtm_ipv6_mr_policy' was not declared. Should it be static?

As the great poet of our time, Homer Simpson, would say:  "d'oh"

After thinking about it for a bit more, I agree with Nikolay that the
policy shouldn't be reused, so apart from adding the "static" here I'll
also rename it to clarify it's the RTM_GETROUTE policy.


-equi/David
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
index ec6e1509fc7c..9909ff77f5a6 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@  static int ip6mr_cache_report(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 static void mr6_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct mfc6_cache *mfc,
 			      int cmd);
 static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
+static int ip6mr_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 static int ip6mr_rtm_dumproute(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			       struct netlink_callback *cb);
 static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, int flags);
@@ -1390,7 +1392,7 @@  int __init ip6_mr_init(void)
 	}
 #endif
 	err = rtnl_register_module(THIS_MODULE, RTNL_FAMILY_IP6MR, RTM_GETROUTE,
-				   NULL, ip6mr_rtm_dumproute, 0);
+				   ip6mr_rtm_getroute, ip6mr_rtm_dumproute, 0);
 	if (err == 0)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -2510,6 +2512,124 @@  static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pk
 	rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_IPV6_MROUTE_R, -ENOBUFS);
 }
 
+const struct nla_policy rtm_ipv6_mr_policy[RTA_MAX + 1] = {
+	[RTA_SRC]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
+	[RTA_DST]		= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
+	[RTA_TABLE]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
+};
+
+static int ip6mr_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+					struct nlattr **tb,
+					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct rtmsg *rtm;
+	int i, err;
+
+	err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*rtm), tb, RTA_MAX, rtm_ipv6_mr_policy,
+			  extack);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+	if ((rtm->rtm_src_len && rtm->rtm_src_len != 128) ||
+	    (rtm->rtm_dst_len && rtm->rtm_dst_len != 128) ||
+	    rtm->rtm_tos || rtm->rtm_table || rtm->rtm_protocol ||
+	    rtm->rtm_scope || rtm->rtm_type || rtm->rtm_flags) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+			       "ipv6: Invalid values in header for multicast route get request");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if ((tb[RTA_SRC] && !rtm->rtm_src_len) ||
+	    (tb[RTA_DST] && !rtm->rtm_dst_len)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv6: rtm_src_len and rtm_dst_len must be 128 for IPv6");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* rtm_ipv6_mr_policy does not list other attributes right now, but
+	 * future changes may reuse rtm_ipv6_mr_policy with adding further
+	 * attrs.  Enforce the subset.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i <= RTA_MAX; i++) {
+		if (!tb[i])
+			continue;
+
+		switch (i) {
+		case RTA_SRC:
+		case RTA_DST:
+		case RTA_TABLE:
+			break;
+		default:
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, tb[i],
+					    "ipv6: Unsupported attribute in multicast route get request");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ip6mr_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct net *net = sock_net(in_skb->sk);
+	struct in6_addr src = {}, grp = {};
+	struct nlattr *tb[RTA_MAX + 1];
+	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+	struct mfc6_cache *cache;
+	struct mr_table *mrt;
+	u32 tableid;
+	int err;
+
+	err = ip6mr_rtm_valid_getroute_req(in_skb, nlh, tb, extack);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto errout;
+
+	if (tb[RTA_SRC])
+		src = nla_get_in6_addr(tb[RTA_SRC]);
+	if (tb[RTA_DST])
+		grp = nla_get_in6_addr(tb[RTA_DST]);
+	tableid = tb[RTA_TABLE] ? nla_get_u32(tb[RTA_TABLE]) : 0;
+
+	mrt = ip6mr_get_table(net, tableid ? tableid : RT_TABLE_DEFAULT);
+	if (!mrt) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "ipv6 MR table does not exist");
+		err = -ENOENT;
+		goto errout_free;
+	}
+
+	/* entries are added/deleted only under RTNL */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	cache = ip6mr_cache_find(mrt, &src, &grp);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (!cache) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "ipv6 MR cache entry not found");
+		err = -ENOENT;
+		goto errout_free;
+	}
+
+	skb = nlmsg_new(mr6_msgsize(false, mrt->maxvif), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!skb) {
+		err = -ENOBUFS;
+		goto errout_free;
+	}
+
+	err = ip6mr_fill_mroute(mrt, skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
+				nlh->nlmsg_seq, cache, RTM_NEWROUTE, 0);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto errout_free;
+
+	err = rtnl_unicast(skb, net, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid);
+
+errout:
+	return err;
+
+errout_free:
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+	goto errout;
+}
+
 static int ip6mr_rtm_dumproute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 {
 	const struct nlmsghdr *nlh = cb->nlh;