diff mbox series

[v3,bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage

Message ID 20220705024555.2729240-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [v3,bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: netdev@vger.kernel.org songliubraving@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org yhs@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success net selftest script(s) already in Makefile
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 94 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with llvm-15
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 with gcc

Commit Message

Dave Marchevsky July 5, 2022, 2:45 a.m. UTC
This benchmark measures grace period latency and kthread cpu usage of
RCU Tasks Trace when many processes are creating/deleting BPF
local_storage. Intent here is to quantify improvement on these metrics
after Paul's recent RCU Tasks patches [0].

Specifically, fork 15k tasks which call a bpf prog that creates/destroys
task local_storage and sleep in a loop, resulting in many
call_rcu_tasks_trace calls.

To determine grace period latency, trace time elapsed between
rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp; for cpu usage
look at rcu_task_trace_kthread's stime in /proc/PID/stat.

On my virtualized test environment (Skylake, 8 cpus) benchmark results
demonstrate significant improvement:

BEFORE Paul's patches:

  SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency        avg 22298.551 us stddev 1302.165 us
  SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period      avg 2.291 stddev 0.324

AFTER Paul's patches:

  SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency        avg 16969.197 us  stddev 2525.053 us
  SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period      avg 1.146 stddev 0.178

Note that since these patches are not in bpf-next benchmarking was done
by cherry-picking this patch onto rcu tree.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220620225402.GA3842369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
v2 -> v3: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220628141200.8417-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
  * print errno when prctl fails, fprintf -> printf nit (Martin)

v1 -> v2: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220623234609.543263-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
  * kprobe -> fentry for pregp/postgp probes (Martin)
  * Make 'Unexpected order of bpf prog calls' detection less brittle by
    only looking for unexpected prog call order after a postgp has been
    seen (Martin, Paul)

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   4 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           |  42 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h           |  12 +
 .../bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c     | 272 ++++++++++++++++++
 ...run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh |  11 +
 .../local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.c     |  67 +++++
 6 files changed, 407 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.c

Comments

Daniel Borkmann July 5, 2022, 12:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7/5/22 4:45 AM, Dave Marchevsky wrote:
> This benchmark measures grace period latency and kthread cpu usage of
> RCU Tasks Trace when many processes are creating/deleting BPF
> local_storage. Intent here is to quantify improvement on these metrics
> after Paul's recent RCU Tasks patches [0].
> 
> Specifically, fork 15k tasks which call a bpf prog that creates/destroys
> task local_storage and sleep in a loop, resulting in many
> call_rcu_tasks_trace calls.
> 
> To determine grace period latency, trace time elapsed between
> rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp; for cpu usage
> look at rcu_task_trace_kthread's stime in /proc/PID/stat.
> 
> On my virtualized test environment (Skylake, 8 cpus) benchmark results
> demonstrate significant improvement:
> 
> BEFORE Paul's patches:
> 
>    SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency        avg 22298.551 us stddev 1302.165 us
>    SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period      avg 2.291 stddev 0.324
> 
> AFTER Paul's patches:
> 
>    SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency        avg 16969.197 us  stddev 2525.053 us
>    SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period      avg 1.146 stddev 0.178
> 
> Note that since these patches are not in bpf-next benchmarking was done
> by cherry-picking this patch onto rcu tree.
> 
>    [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220620225402.GA3842369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

Looks like this still fails BPF CI on the gcc runners:

https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7194224073?check_suite_focus=true
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7194224318?check_suite_focus=true

   [...]
   benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c: In function 'kthread_pid_ticks':
   benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c:115:2: error: ignoring return value of 'fscanf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
     115 |  fscanf(f, "%*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %ld", &stime);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
   make: *** [Makefile:566: /home/actions-runner/_work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.o] Error 1
   make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
   Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

Thanks,
Daniel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index e32a28fe8bc1..dfaac97222af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -574,6 +574,7 @@  $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_loop.o: $(OUTPUT)/bpf_loop_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_strncmp.o: $(OUTPUT)/strncmp_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.o: $(OUTPUT)/bpf_hashmap_full_update_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o: $(OUTPUT)/local_storage_bench.skel.h
+$(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.o: $(OUTPUT)/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.skel.h
 $(OUTPUT)/bench.o: bench.h testing_helpers.h $(BPFOBJ)
 $(OUTPUT)/bench: LDLIBS += -lm
 $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
@@ -587,7 +588,8 @@  $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_loop.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_strncmp.o \
 		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.o \
-		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o
+		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o \
+		 $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.o
 	$(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
 	$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(filter %.a %.o,$^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index 1e7b5d4b1f11..c1f20a147462 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -79,6 +79,43 @@  void hits_drops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
 	       hits_per_sec, hits_per_prod, drops_per_sec, hits_per_sec + drops_per_sec);
 }
 
+void
+grace_period_latency_basic_stats(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt, struct basic_stats *gp_stat)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	memset(gp_stat, 0, sizeof(struct basic_stats));
+
+	for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++)
+		gp_stat->mean += res[i].gp_ns / 1000.0 / (double)res[i].gp_ct / (0.0 + res_cnt);
+
+#define IT_MEAN_DIFF (res[i].gp_ns / 1000.0 / (double)res[i].gp_ct - gp_stat->mean)
+	if (res_cnt > 1) {
+		for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++)
+			gp_stat->stddev += (IT_MEAN_DIFF * IT_MEAN_DIFF) / (res_cnt - 1.0);
+	}
+	gp_stat->stddev = sqrt(gp_stat->stddev);
+#undef IT_MEAN_DIFF
+}
+
+void
+grace_period_ticks_basic_stats(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt, struct basic_stats *gp_stat)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	memset(gp_stat, 0, sizeof(struct basic_stats));
+	for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++)
+		gp_stat->mean += res[i].stime / (double)res[i].gp_ct / (0.0 + res_cnt);
+
+#define IT_MEAN_DIFF (res[i].stime / (double)res[i].gp_ct - gp_stat->mean)
+	if (res_cnt > 1) {
+		for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++)
+			gp_stat->stddev += (IT_MEAN_DIFF * IT_MEAN_DIFF) / (res_cnt - 1.0);
+	}
+	gp_stat->stddev = sqrt(gp_stat->stddev);
+#undef IT_MEAN_DIFF
+}
+
 void hits_drops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -236,6 +273,7 @@  extern struct argp bench_ringbufs_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_bloom_map_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_bpf_loop_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_local_storage_argp;
+extern struct argp bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_argp;
 extern struct argp bench_strncmp_argp;
 
 static const struct argp_child bench_parsers[] = {
@@ -244,6 +282,8 @@  static const struct argp_child bench_parsers[] = {
 	{ &bench_bpf_loop_argp, 0, "bpf_loop helper benchmark", 0 },
 	{ &bench_local_storage_argp, 0, "local_storage benchmark", 0 },
 	{ &bench_strncmp_argp, 0, "bpf_strncmp helper benchmark", 0 },
+	{ &bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_argp, 0,
+		"local_storage RCU Tasks Trace slowdown benchmark", 0 },
 	{},
 };
 
@@ -449,6 +489,7 @@  extern const struct bench bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update;
 extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_seq_get;
 extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_interleaved_get;
 extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control;
+extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_tasks_trace;
 
 static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_count_global,
@@ -487,6 +528,7 @@  static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_local_storage_cache_seq_get,
 	&bench_local_storage_cache_interleaved_get,
 	&bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control,
+	&bench_local_storage_tasks_trace,
 };
 
 static void setup_benchmark()
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
index 4b15286753ba..d748255877e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
@@ -30,11 +30,19 @@  struct env {
 	struct cpu_set cons_cpus;
 };
 
+struct basic_stats {
+	double mean;
+	double stddev;
+};
+
 struct bench_res {
 	long hits;
 	long drops;
 	long false_hits;
 	long important_hits;
+	unsigned long gp_ns;
+	unsigned long gp_ct;
+	unsigned int stime;
 };
 
 struct bench {
@@ -65,6 +73,10 @@  void ops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
 void local_storage_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res,
 				   long delta_ns);
 void local_storage_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
+void grace_period_latency_basic_stats(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt,
+				      struct basic_stats *gp_stat);
+void grace_period_ticks_basic_stats(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt,
+				    struct basic_stats *gp_stat);
 
 static inline __u64 get_time_ns(void)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2ec51269e470
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <argp.h>
+
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include "local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.skel.h"
+#include "bench.h"
+
+#include <signal.h>
+
+static struct {
+	__u32 nr_procs;
+	__u32 kthread_pid;
+	bool quiet;
+} args = {
+	.nr_procs = 1000,
+	.kthread_pid = 0,
+	.quiet = false,
+};
+
+enum {
+	ARG_NR_PROCS = 7000,
+	ARG_KTHREAD_PID = 7001,
+	ARG_QUIET = 7002,
+};
+
+static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
+	{ "nr_procs", ARG_NR_PROCS, "NR_PROCS", 0,
+		"Set number of user processes to spin up"},
+	{ "kthread_pid", ARG_KTHREAD_PID, "PID", 0,
+		"Pid of rcu_tasks_trace kthread for ticks tracking"},
+	{ "quiet", ARG_QUIET, "{0,1}", 0,
+		"If true, don't report progress"},
+	{},
+};
+
+static error_t parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
+{
+	long ret;
+
+	switch (key) {
+	case ARG_NR_PROCS:
+		ret = strtol(arg, NULL, 10);
+		if (ret < 1 || ret > UINT_MAX) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "invalid nr_procs\n");
+			argp_usage(state);
+		}
+		args.nr_procs = ret;
+		break;
+	case ARG_KTHREAD_PID:
+		ret = strtol(arg, NULL, 10);
+		if (ret < 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "invalid kthread_pid\n");
+			argp_usage(state);
+		}
+		args.kthread_pid = ret;
+		break;
+	case ARG_QUIET:
+		ret = strtol(arg, NULL, 10);
+		if (ret < 0 || ret > 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "invalid quiet %ld\n", ret);
+			argp_usage(state);
+		}
+		args.quiet = ret;
+		break;
+break;
+	default:
+		return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+const struct argp bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_argp = {
+	.options = opts,
+	.parser = parse_arg,
+};
+
+#define MAX_SLEEP_PROCS 150000
+
+static void validate(void)
+{
+	if (env.producer_cnt != 1) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-producer!\n");
+		exit(1);
+	}
+	if (env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-consumer!\n");
+		exit(1);
+	}
+
+	if (args.nr_procs > MAX_SLEEP_PROCS) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "benchmark supports up to %u sleeper procs!\n",
+			MAX_SLEEP_PROCS);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+}
+
+static long kthread_pid_ticks(void)
+{
+	char procfs_path[100];
+	long stime;
+	FILE *f;
+
+	if (!args.kthread_pid)
+		return -1;
+
+	sprintf(procfs_path, "/proc/%u/stat", args.kthread_pid);
+	f = fopen(procfs_path, "r");
+	if (f < 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "couldn't open %s, exiting\n", procfs_path);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+	fscanf(f, "%*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %ld", &stime);
+	fclose(f);
+	return stime;
+}
+
+static struct {
+	struct local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench *skel;
+	long prev_kthread_stime;
+} ctx;
+
+static void sleep_and_loop(void)
+{
+	while (true) {
+		sleep(rand() % 4);
+		syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+	}
+}
+
+static void local_storage_tasks_trace_setup(void)
+{
+	int i, err, forkret, runner_pid;
+
+	runner_pid = getpid();
+
+	for (i = 0; i < args.nr_procs; i++) {
+		forkret = fork();
+		if (forkret < 0) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "Error forking sleeper proc %u of %u, exiting\n", i,
+				args.nr_procs);
+			goto err_out;
+		}
+
+		if (!forkret) {
+			err = prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL);
+			if (err < 0) {
+				fprintf(stderr, "prctl failed with err %d, exiting\n", errno);
+				goto err_out;
+			}
+
+			if (getppid() != runner_pid) {
+				fprintf(stderr, "Runner died while spinning up procs, exiting\n");
+				goto err_out;
+			}
+			sleep_and_loop();
+		}
+	}
+	printf("Spun up %u procs (our pid %d)\n", args.nr_procs, runner_pid);
+
+	setup_libbpf();
+
+	ctx.skel = local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench__open_and_load();
+	if (!ctx.skel) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error doing open_and_load, exiting\n");
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	ctx.prev_kthread_stime = kthread_pid_ticks();
+
+	if (!bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.get_local)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error attaching bpf program\n");
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	if (!bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.pregp_step)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error attaching bpf program\n");
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	if (!bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.postgp)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error attaching bpf program\n");
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	return;
+err_out:
+	exit(1);
+}
+
+static void measure(struct bench_res *res)
+{
+	long ticks;
+
+	res->gp_ct = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->gp_hits, 0);
+	res->gp_ns = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->gp_times, 0);
+	ticks = kthread_pid_ticks();
+	res->stime = ticks - ctx.prev_kthread_stime;
+	ctx.prev_kthread_stime = ticks;
+}
+
+static void *consumer(void *input)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *producer(void *input)
+{
+	while (true)
+		syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
+{
+	if (ctx.skel->bss->unexpected) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: Unexpected order of bpf prog calls (postgp after pregp).");
+		fprintf(stderr, "Data can't be trusted, exiting\n");
+		exit(1);
+	}
+
+	if (args.quiet)
+		return;
+
+	printf("Iter %d\t avg tasks_trace grace period latency\t%lf ns\n",
+	       iter, res->gp_ns / (double)res->gp_ct);
+	printf("Iter %d\t avg ticks per tasks_trace grace period\t%lf\n",
+	       iter, res->stime / (double)res->gp_ct);
+}
+
+static void report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
+{
+	struct basic_stats gp_stat;
+
+	grace_period_latency_basic_stats(res, res_cnt, &gp_stat);
+	printf("SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency");
+	printf("\tavg %.3lf us\tstddev %.3lf us\n", gp_stat.mean, gp_stat.stddev);
+	grace_period_ticks_basic_stats(res, res_cnt, &gp_stat);
+	printf("SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period");
+	printf("\tavg %.3lf\tstddev %.3lf\n", gp_stat.mean, gp_stat.stddev);
+}
+
+/* local-storage-tasks-trace: Benchmark performance of BPF local_storage's use
+ * of RCU Tasks-Trace.
+ *
+ * Stress RCU Tasks Trace by forking many tasks, all of which do no work aside
+ * from sleep() loop, and creating/destroying BPF task-local storage on wakeup.
+ * The number of forked tasks is configurable.
+ *
+ * exercising code paths which call call_rcu_tasks_trace while there are many
+ * thousands of tasks on the system should result in RCU Tasks-Trace having to
+ * do a noticeable amount of work.
+ *
+ * This should be observable by measuring rcu_tasks_trace_kthread CPU usage
+ * after the grace period has ended, or by measuring grace period latency.
+ *
+ * This benchmark uses both approaches, attaching to rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step
+ * and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp functions to measure grace period latency and
+ * using /proc/PID/stat to measure rcu_tasks_trace_kthread kernel ticks
+ */
+const struct bench bench_local_storage_tasks_trace = {
+	.name = "local-storage-tasks-trace",
+	.validate = validate,
+	.setup = local_storage_tasks_trace_setup,
+	.producer_thread = producer,
+	.consumer_thread = consumer,
+	.measure = measure,
+	.report_progress = report_progress,
+	.report_final = report_final,
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..5dac1f02892c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ 
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+kthread_pid=`pgrep rcu_tasks_trace_kthread`
+
+if [ -z $kthread_pid ]; then
+	echo "error: Couldn't find rcu_tasks_trace_kthread"
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+./bench --nr_procs 15000 --kthread_pid $kthread_pid -d 600 --quiet 1 local-storage-tasks-trace
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..03bf69f49075
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace_bench.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
+	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} task_storage SEC(".maps");
+
+long hits;
+long gp_hits;
+long gp_times;
+long current_gp_start;
+long unexpected;
+bool postgp_seen;
+
+SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+int get_local(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct task_struct *task;
+	int idx;
+	int *s;
+
+	idx = 0;
+	task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+	s = bpf_task_storage_get(&task_storage, task, &idx,
+				 BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+	if (!s)
+		return 0;
+
+	*s = 3;
+	bpf_task_storage_delete(&task_storage, task);
+	__sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, 1);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step")
+int pregp_step(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	current_gp_start = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/rcu_tasks_trace_postgp")
+int postgp(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	if (!current_gp_start && postgp_seen) {
+		/* Will only happen if prog tracing rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step doesn't
+		 * execute before this prog
+		 */
+		__sync_add_and_fetch(&unexpected, 1);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	__sync_add_and_fetch(&gp_times, bpf_ktime_get_ns() - current_gp_start);
+	__sync_add_and_fetch(&gp_hits, 1);
+	current_gp_start = 0;
+	postgp_seen = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";