mbox series

[00/13] Add ipq806x missing bindings

Message ID 20220705133917.8405-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Add ipq806x missing bindings | expand

Message

Christian Marangi July 5, 2022, 1:39 p.m. UTC 
This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.

This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
documentation require some changes.

So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
making changes to any drivers.

Christian Marangi (13):
  ARM: dts: qcom: add multiple missing pin definition for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: add gsbi6 missing definition for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: add missing rpm regulators and cells for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: disable smb208 regulators for ipq8064-rb3011
  ARM: dts: qcom: add missing snps,dwmac compatible for gmac ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: enable usb phy by default for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: reduce pci IO size to 64K for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: fix dtc warning for missing #address-cells for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: add smem node for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: add sic non secure node for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: fix and add some missing gsbi node for ipq8064
  ARM: dts: qcom: add speedbin efuse nvmem binding
  ARM: dts: qcom: remove redundant binding from ipq8064 rb3011 dts

 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-rb3011.dts |  21 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi       | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Comments

Christian Marangi July 5, 2022, 2:04 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
> > 
> > This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
> > to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
> > documentation require some changes.
> > 
> > So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
> > making changes to any drivers.
> 
> You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
> have any bindings.
>

What would be correct word? Node? Compatible?
Sorry for the confusion.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 5, 2022, 2:28 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
> 
> This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
> to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
> documentation require some changes.
> 
> So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
> making changes to any drivers.

You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
have any bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Christian Marangi July 5, 2022, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 16:04, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
> >>>
> >>> This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
> >>> to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
> >>> documentation require some changes.
> >>>
> >>> So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
> >>> making changes to any drivers.
> >>
> >> You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
> >> have any bindings.
> >>
> > 
> > What would be correct word? Node? Compatible?
> 
> "device node" or just "node"
> 

Ok will fix it in v2 and also in other patch where I used binding
instead of node.
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 5, 2022, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #4 
On 05/07/2022 16:04, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
>>>
>>> This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
>>> to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
>>> documentation require some changes.
>>>
>>> So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
>>> making changes to any drivers.
>>
>> You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
>> have any bindings.
>>
> 
> What would be correct word? Node? Compatible?

"device node" or just "node"

Best regards,
Krzysztof