diff mbox series

[v14,10/17] PCI: imx6: Turn off regulator when system is in suspend mode

Message ID 1656645935-1370-11-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series PCI: imx6: refine codes and add the error propagation | expand

Commit Message

Hongxing Zhu July 1, 2022, 3:25 a.m. UTC 
The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator disable
shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().

Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off regulator when
the system is in suspend mode.

To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the regulator
in shutdown.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-hongxing.z
hu@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Lucas Stach July 13, 2022, 8:34 a.m. UTC | #1 
Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 11:25 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator disable
> shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().
> 
> Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off regulator when
> the system is in suspend mode.
> 
> To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the regulator
> in shutdown.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-hongxing.z
> hu@nxp.com
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>  
>  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>  {
> -	struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev;
> -
>  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
>  	case IMX7D:
>  	case IMX8MQ:
> @@ -702,14 +700,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
> -		int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> -
> -		if (ret)
> -			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
> -				ret);
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
>  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio))
>  		gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> @@ -722,7 +712,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie)) {
> +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
>  		ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie regulator: %d\n",

The regulator really has nothing to do with the core reset. Please move
this regulator enable into imx6_pcie_host_init().

> @@ -795,7 +785,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_clks:
> -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
> +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
>  		ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
>  		if (ret)
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
> @@ -1022,6 +1012,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1268,6 +1261,8 @@ static void imx6_pcie_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	/* bring down link, so bootloader gets clean state in case of reboot */
>  	imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(imx6_pcie);
> +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);

This looks like a separate change, not mentioned in the commit message.
I'm not sure if we should do this. Shutdown is supposed to just stop
the device, which is already achieved by
imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(). 

If we would want to do a full cleanup here we would also need to
disable clocks and get the reset GPIO into asserted state. I don't
think we want to do all of this here.

Regards,
Lucas
>  }
>  
>  static const struct imx6_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
Hongxing Zhu July 13, 2022, 10:56 a.m. UTC | #2 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2022年7月13日 16:34
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> festevam@gmail.com; francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/17] PCI: imx6: Turn off regulator when system is in
> suspend mode
> 
> Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 11:25 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator
> > disable shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().
> >
> > Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off regulator
> > when the system is in suspend mode.
> >
> > To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the
> > regulator in shutdown.
> >
> > Link:
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore
> > .kernel.org%2Fr%2F1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-hongxing.z&amp;d
> at
> >
> a=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C361c9bf365b64895482808da6
> 4aa7cca%
> >
> 7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6379329806385373
> 39%7CUnkn
> >
> own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1
> haWwi
> >
> LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=A%2Fw6AFCddC0T%2FA
> ocBT%2F7OJZ
> > ddAeYPTbgeAxpHpPubkw%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > hu@nxp.com
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie
> > *imx6_pcie)
> >
> >  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > {
> > -	struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev;
> > -
> >  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> >  	case IMX7D:
> >  	case IMX8MQ:
> > @@ -702,14 +700,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct
> imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
> > -		int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > -
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
> > -				ret);
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> >  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio))
> >  		gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> > @@ -722,7 +712,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie)) {
> > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> >  		ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
> 
> The regulator really has nothing to do with the core reset. Please move this
> regulator enable into imx6_pcie_host_init().
Hi Lucas:
Thanks for your comments.
Got that. Had done it in the 11/17 commit.

> 
> > @@ -795,7 +785,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> >  	return 0;
> >
> >  err_clks:
> > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
> > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> >  		ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", @@
> -1022,6
> > +1012,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1268,6 +1261,8 @@ static void imx6_pcie_shutdown(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >  	/* bring down link, so bootloader gets clean state in case of reboot */
> >  	imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(imx6_pcie);
> > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> 
> This looks like a separate change, not mentioned in the commit message.
> I'm not sure if we should do this. Shutdown is supposed to just stop the device,
> which is already achieved by imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> 
> If we would want to do a full cleanup here we would also need to disable
> clocks and get the reset GPIO into asserted state. I don't think we want to do
> all of this here.
The regulator_disable() was contained in imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() before.
When refine the regulator usage, the regulator_disable() is moved out of
 imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
Based on the discussion [1] with Francesco.
To keep the same behavior, the regulator_disable() is placed behind of
 imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() in imx6_pcie_shutdown() here.
[1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/1644290735-3797-6-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com/

Best Regards
Richard

> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> >  }
> >
> >  static const struct imx6_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>
Lucas Stach July 13, 2022, 11:22 a.m. UTC | #3 
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.07.2022 um 10:56 +0000 schrieb Hongxing Zhu:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > Sent: 2022年7月13日 16:34
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> > robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> > festevam@gmail.com; francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/17] PCI: imx6: Turn off regulator when
> > system is in
> > suspend mode
> > 
> > Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 11:25 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator
> > > disable shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().
> > > 
> > > Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off
> > > regulator
> > > when the system is in suspend mode.
> > > 
> > > To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the
> > > regulator in shutdown.
> > > 
> > > Link:
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore
> > > .kernel.org%2Fr%2F1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-
> > > hongxing.z&amp;d
> > at
> > > 
> > a=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C361c9bf365b64895482808da6
> > 4aa7cca%
> > > 
> > 7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6379329806385373
> > 39%7CUnkn
> > > 
> > own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1
> > haWwi
> > > 
> > LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=A%2Fw6AFCddC0T%2FA
> > ocBT%2F7OJZ
> > > ddAeYPTbgeAxpHpPubkw%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > hu@nxp.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct
> > > imx6_pcie
> > > *imx6_pcie)
> > > 
> > >  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie
> > > *imx6_pcie)
> > > {
> > > -	struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev;
> > > -
> > >  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > >  	case IMX7D:
> > >  	case IMX8MQ:
> > > @@ -702,14 +700,6 @@ static void
> > > imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct
> > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > > 
> > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > >vpcie) > 0) {
> > > -		int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > -
> > > -		if (ret)
> > > -			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie
> > > regulator: %d\n",
> > > -				ret);
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > >  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> > >  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio))
> > >  		gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> > > @@ -722,7 +712,7 @@ static int
> > > imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > >  	int ret;
> > > 
> > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > >vpcie)) {
> > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> > >  		ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > >  		if (ret) {
> > >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie
> > > regulator: %d\n",
> > 
> > The regulator really has nothing to do with the core reset. Please
> > move this
> > regulator enable into imx6_pcie_host_init().
> Hi Lucas:
> Thanks for your comments.
> Got that. Had done it in the 11/17 commit.
> 
> > 
> > > @@ -795,7 +785,7 @@ static int
> > > imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  	return 0;
> > > 
> > >  err_clks:
> > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > >vpcie) > 0) {
> > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> > >  		ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > >  		if (ret)
> > >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie
> > > regulator: %d\n", @@
> > -1022,6
> > > +1012,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > > 
> > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > +
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > @@ -1268,6 +1261,8 @@ static void imx6_pcie_shutdown(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > 
> > >  	/* bring down link, so bootloader gets clean state in
> > > case of reboot */
> > >  	imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(imx6_pcie);
> > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > 
> > This looks like a separate change, not mentioned in the commit
> > message.
> > I'm not sure if we should do this. Shutdown is supposed to just
> > stop the device,
> > which is already achieved by imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> > 
> > If we would want to do a full cleanup here we would also need to
> > disable
> > clocks and get the reset GPIO into asserted state. I don't think we
> > want to do
> > all of this here.
> The regulator_disable() was contained in
> imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() before.
> When refine the regulator usage, the regulator_disable() is moved out
> of
>  imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> Based on the discussion [1] with Francesco.
> To keep the same behavior, the regulator_disable() is placed behind
> of
>  imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() in imx6_pcie_shutdown() here.
> [1]
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/1644290735-3797-6-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com/

I disagree with Francesco on this. This kind of half-done cleanup
doesn't help in any way. Either we care about doing a full cleanup
here, which would involve clocks and reset GPIOs, or we just care about
getting the core in a state where it survives a reboot, which frankly
was the original intention when I added the shutdown callback.

As the devices on the bus will see a full PERST reset via the reset
GPIO anyways, there is no harm in keeping them powered across the
reboot.

Regards,
Lucas
Hongxing Zhu July 13, 2022, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #4 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2022年7月13日 19:23
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> festevam@gmail.com; francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/17] PCI: imx6: Turn off regulator when system is in
> suspend mode
> 
> Am Mittwoch, dem 13.07.2022 um 10:56 +0000 schrieb Hongxing Zhu:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > > Sent: 2022年7月13日 16:34
> > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; bhelgaas@google.com;
> > > robh+dt@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> > > festevam@gmail.com; francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
> > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/17] PCI: imx6: Turn off regulator when
> > > system is in suspend mode
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 11:25 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > > > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator
> > > > disable shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().
> > > >
> > > > Move the regulator_disable to the suspend function, turn off
> > > > regulator when the system is in suspend mode.
> > > >
> > > > To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the
> > > > regulator in shutdown.
> > > >
> > > > Link:
> > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > lore
> > > > .kernel.org%2Fr%2F1655189942-12678-6-git-send-email-
> > > > hongxing.z&amp;d
> > > at
> > > >
> > >
> a=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C361c9bf365b64895482808da6
> > > 4aa7cca%
> > > >
> > >
> 7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6379329806385373
> > > 39%7CUnkn
> > > >
> > >
> own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1
> > > haWwi
> > > >
> > >
> LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=A%2Fw6AFCddC0T%2FA
> > > ocBT%2F7OJZ
> > > > ddAeYPTbgeAxpHpPubkw%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > hu@nxp.com
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct
> > > > imx6_pcie
> > > > *imx6_pcie)
> > > >
> > > >  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie
> > > > *imx6_pcie)
> > > > {
> > > > -	struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev;
> > > > -
> > > >  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > > >  	case IMX7D:
> > > >  	case IMX8MQ:
> > > > @@ -702,14 +700,6 @@ static void
> > > > imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct
> > > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > >  		break;
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > > >vpcie) > 0) {
> > > > -		int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > > -
> > > > -		if (ret)
> > > > -			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie
> > > > regulator: %d\n",
> > > > -				ret);
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > >  	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> > > >  	if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio))
> > > >  		gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> > > > @@ -722,7 +712,7 @@ static int
> > > > imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> > > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >
> > > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > > >vpcie)) {
> > > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> > > >  		ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > >  		if (ret) {
> > > >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie
> > > > regulator: %d\n",
> > >
> > > The regulator really has nothing to do with the core reset. Please
> > > move this regulator enable into imx6_pcie_host_init().
> > Hi Lucas:
> > Thanks for your comments.
> > Got that. Had done it in the 11/17 commit.
> >
> > >
> > > > @@ -795,7 +785,7 @@ static int
> > > > imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct
> > > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >
> > > >  err_clks:
> > > > -	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie-
> > > > >vpcie) > 0) {
> > > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
> > > >  		ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > >  		if (ret)
> > > >  			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie
> > > > regulator: %d\n", @@
> > > -1022,6
> > > > +1012,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > >  		break;
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > > > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > > > +
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1268,6 +1261,8 @@ static void imx6_pcie_shutdown(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > >
> > > >  	/* bring down link, so bootloader gets clean state in case of
> > > > reboot */
> > > >  	imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(imx6_pcie);
> > > > +	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
> > > > +		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > >
> > > This looks like a separate change, not mentioned in the commit
> > > message.
> > > I'm not sure if we should do this. Shutdown is supposed to just stop
> > > the device, which is already achieved by
> > > imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> > >
> > > If we would want to do a full cleanup here we would also need to
> > > disable clocks and get the reset GPIO into asserted state. I don't
> > > think we want to do all of this here.
> > The regulator_disable() was contained in
> > imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() before.
> > When refine the regulator usage, the regulator_disable() is moved out
> > of
> >  imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> > Based on the discussion [1] with Francesco.
> > To keep the same behavior, the regulator_disable() is placed behind of
> >  imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() in imx6_pcie_shutdown() here.
> > [1]
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> >
> hwork.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pci%2Fpatch%2F1644290735-3797-6-gi
> t
> >
> -send-email-hongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Chongxing.
> zhu%
> >
> 40nxp.com%7C88b4bedd17e84c440c5608da64c20698%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> fa92cd99
> >
> c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637933081743458707%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ
> sb3d8eyJWIjo
> >
> iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C300
> 0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&amp;sdata=NHl4prCMrfR4KAZgIaCuJX%2FOrMJW3Up31NX%2FzMMY
> pag%3D&amp
> > ;reserved=0
> 
> I disagree with Francesco on this. This kind of half-done cleanup doesn't help
> in any way. Either we care about doing a full cleanup here, which would
> involve clocks and reset GPIOs, or we just care about getting the core in a state
> where it survives a reboot, which frankly was the original intention when I
> added the shutdown callback.
> 
> As the devices on the bus will see a full PERST reset via the reset GPIO anyways,
> there is no harm in keeping them powered across the reboot.
Okay, I see.
Thanks for your comment.
I can remove it if you insist.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
index 2b42c37f1617..f72eb609769b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
@@ -670,8 +670,6 @@  static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 
 static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 {
-	struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev;
-
 	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
 	case IMX7D:
 	case IMX8MQ:
@@ -702,14 +700,6 @@  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
-		int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
-
-		if (ret)
-			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
-				ret);
-	}
-
 	/* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
 	if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio))
 		gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
@@ -722,7 +712,7 @@  static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && !regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie)) {
+	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
 		ret = regulator_enable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
@@ -795,7 +785,7 @@  static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 	return 0;
 
 err_clks:
-	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
+	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie) {
 		ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
 		if (ret)
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n",
@@ -1022,6 +1012,9 @@  static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
 		break;
 	}
 
+	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
+		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1268,6 +1261,8 @@  static void imx6_pcie_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* bring down link, so bootloader gets clean state in case of reboot */
 	imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(imx6_pcie);
+	if (imx6_pcie->vpcie)
+		regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
 }
 
 static const struct imx6_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {