diff mbox series

[net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action initialization

Message ID 20220717082532.25802-1-ozsh@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action initialization | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: davem@davemloft.net; 7 maintainers not CCed: jhs@mojatatu.com xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com jiri@resnulli.us pabeni@redhat.com davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com kuba@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 30 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Oz Shlomo July 17, 2022, 8:25 a.m. UTC
The cited commit refactored the flow action initialization sequence to
use an interface method when translating tc action instances to flow
offload objects. The refactored version skips the initialization of the
generic flow action attributes for tc actions, such as pedit, that allocate
more than one offload entry. This can cause potential issues for drivers
mapping flow action ids.

Populate the generic flow action fields for all the flow action entries.

Fixes: c54e1d920f04 ("flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops for flow action setup")
Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Baowen Zheng July 18, 2022, 1:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:26 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action initialization
>
>The cited commit refactored the flow action initialization sequence to use an
>interface method when translating tc action instances to flow offload objects.
>The refactored version skips the initialization of the generic flow action
>attributes for tc actions, such as pedit, that allocate more than one offload
>entry. This can cause potential issues for drivers mapping flow action ids.
>
>Populate the generic flow action fields for all the flow action entries.
>
>Fixes: c54e1d920f04 ("flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops for flow action
>setup")
>Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
>Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
>---
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index
>9bb4d3dcc994..d07c04096560 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>@@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
> 		    struct tc_action *actions[],
> 		    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
>-	int i, j, index, err = 0;
>+	int i, j, k, index, err = 0;
> 	struct tc_action *act;
>
> 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_ANY !=
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY); @@ -3557,10 +3557,19 @@ int
>tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
> 		entry->hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
> 		index = 0;
> 		err = tc_setup_offload_act(act, entry, &index, extack);
>-		if (!err)
>-			j += index;
>-		else
>+		if (err)
> 			goto err_out_locked;
>+
>+		/* initialize the generic parameters for actions that
>+		 * allocate more than one offload entry per tc action
>+		 */
>+		for (k = 1; k < index ; k++) {
>+			entry[k].hw_stats = tc_act_hw_stats(act->hw_stats);
>+			entry[k].hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
Thanks Oz for bringing this change to us, I think it makes sense for us when the pedit action is offloaded as a single action. 
Just a tiny advice for your reference, maybe we can start assignment from k = 0 and delete the first entry assignment above, then we will put all the general assignment in this loop, it will be more clean, WDYT?
>+		}
>+
>+		j += index;
>+
> 		spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock);
> 	}
>
>--
>1.8.3.1
Oz Shlomo July 18, 2022, 12:28 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Baoweng,

On 7/18/2022 4:40 AM, Baowen Zheng wrote:
> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:26 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action initialization
>>
>> The cited commit refactored the flow action initialization sequence to use an
>> interface method when translating tc action instances to flow offload objects.
>> The refactored version skips the initialization of the generic flow action
>> attributes for tc actions, such as pedit, that allocate more than one offload
>> entry. This can cause potential issues for drivers mapping flow action ids.
>>
>> Populate the generic flow action fields for all the flow action entries.
>>
>> Fixes: c54e1d920f04 ("flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops for flow action
>> setup")
>> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> net/sched/cls_api.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index
>> 9bb4d3dcc994..d07c04096560 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
>> 		    struct tc_action *actions[],
>> 		    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> -	int i, j, index, err = 0;
>> +	int i, j, k, index, err = 0;
>> 	struct tc_action *act;
>>
>> 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_ANY !=
>> FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY); @@ -3557,10 +3557,19 @@ int
>> tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
>> 		entry->hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
>> 		index = 0;
>> 		err = tc_setup_offload_act(act, entry, &index, extack);
>> -		if (!err)
>> -			j += index;
>> -		else
>> +		if (err)
>> 			goto err_out_locked;
>> +
>> +		/* initialize the generic parameters for actions that
>> +		 * allocate more than one offload entry per tc action
>> +		 */
>> +		for (k = 1; k < index ; k++) {
>> +			entry[k].hw_stats = tc_act_hw_stats(act->hw_stats);
>> +			entry[k].hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
> Thanks Oz for bringing this change to us, I think it makes sense for us when the pedit action is offloaded as a single action.
> Just a tiny advice for your reference, maybe we can start assignment from k = 0 and delete the first entry assignment above, then we will put all the general assignment in this loop, it will be more clean, WDYT?

If we do that then the hw_stats and hw_index parameters will not be 
available to the offload_act_setup method.
AFAIU no tc action actually uses these values (so possibly no 
regression) but perhaps it is better to leave them initialized.



>> +		}
>> +
>> +		j += index;
>> +
>> 		spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock);
>> 	}
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>
Baowen Zheng July 19, 2022, 1:30 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Oz:
On July 18, 2022 8:29 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>On 7/18/2022 4:40 AM, Baowen Zheng wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:26 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action
>>> initialization
>>>
>>> The cited commit refactored the flow action initialization sequence
>>> to use an interface method when translating tc action instances to flow
>offload objects.
>>> The refactored version skips the initialization of the generic flow
>>> action attributes for tc actions, such as pedit, that allocate more
>>> than one offload entry. This can cause potential issues for drivers mapping
>flow action ids.
>>>
>>> Populate the generic flow action fields for all the flow action entries.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c54e1d920f04 ("flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops for flow
>>> action
>>> setup")
>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sched/cls_api.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index
>>> 9bb4d3dcc994..d07c04096560 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action
>*flow_action,
>>> 		    struct tc_action *actions[],
>>> 		    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {
>>> -	int i, j, index, err = 0;
>>> +	int i, j, k, index, err = 0;
>>> 	struct tc_action *act;
>>>
>>> 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_ANY !=
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY); @@
>>> -3557,10 +3557,19 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action
>>> *flow_action,
>>> 		entry->hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
>>> 		index = 0;
>>> 		err = tc_setup_offload_act(act, entry, &index, extack);
>>> -		if (!err)
>>> -			j += index;
>>> -		else
>>> +		if (err)
>>> 			goto err_out_locked;
>>> +
>>> +		/* initialize the generic parameters for actions that
>>> +		 * allocate more than one offload entry per tc action
>>> +		 */
>>> +		for (k = 1; k < index ; k++) {
>>> +			entry[k].hw_stats = tc_act_hw_stats(act->hw_stats);
>>> +			entry[k].hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
>> Thanks Oz for bringing this change to us, I think it makes sense for us when
>the pedit action is offloaded as a single action.
>> Just a tiny advice for your reference, maybe we can start assignment from k
>= 0 and delete the first entry assignment above, then we will put all the
>general assignment in this loop, it will be more clean, WDYT?
>
>If we do that then the hw_stats and hw_index parameters will not be
>available to the offload_act_setup method.
>AFAIU no tc action actually uses these values (so possibly no
>regression) but perhaps it is better to leave them initialized.
thanks for clarify about this, for the use of hw_index and hw_stats in tc_setup_offload_act, since we pass the act to function, I think we can get parameters from act if they are needed. 
What is your opinion?
>
>
>
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		j += index;
>>> +
>>> 		spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock);
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>
Oz Shlomo July 19, 2022, 9:32 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Baowen,

On 7/19/2022 4:30 AM, Baowen Zheng wrote:
> Hi Oz:
> On July 18, 2022 8:29 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>> On 7/18/2022 4:40 AM, Baowen Zheng wrote:
>>> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:26 PM, Oz Shlomo wrote:
>>>> Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix flow action
>>>> initialization
>>>>
>>>> The cited commit refactored the flow action initialization sequence
>>>> to use an interface method when translating tc action instances to flow
>> offload objects.
>>>> The refactored version skips the initialization of the generic flow
>>>> action attributes for tc actions, such as pedit, that allocate more
>>>> than one offload entry. This can cause potential issues for drivers mapping
>> flow action ids.
>>>>
>>>> Populate the generic flow action fields for all the flow action entries.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: c54e1d920f04 ("flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops for flow
>>>> action
>>>> setup")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/sched/cls_api.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index
>>>> 9bb4d3dcc994..d07c04096560 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action
>> *flow_action,
>>>> 		    struct tc_action *actions[],
>>>> 		    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {
>>>> -	int i, j, index, err = 0;
>>>> +	int i, j, k, index, err = 0;
>>>> 	struct tc_action *act;
>>>>
>>>> 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_ANY !=
>> FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY); @@
>>>> -3557,10 +3557,19 @@ int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action
>>>> *flow_action,
>>>> 		entry->hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
>>>> 		index = 0;
>>>> 		err = tc_setup_offload_act(act, entry, &index, extack);
>>>> -		if (!err)
>>>> -			j += index;
>>>> -		else
>>>> +		if (err)
>>>> 			goto err_out_locked;
>>>> +
>>>> +		/* initialize the generic parameters for actions that
>>>> +		 * allocate more than one offload entry per tc action
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		for (k = 1; k < index ; k++) {
>>>> +			entry[k].hw_stats = tc_act_hw_stats(act->hw_stats);
>>>> +			entry[k].hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
>>> Thanks Oz for bringing this change to us, I think it makes sense for us when
>> the pedit action is offloaded as a single action.
>>> Just a tiny advice for your reference, maybe we can start assignment from k
>> = 0 and delete the first entry assignment above, then we will put all the
>> general assignment in this loop, it will be more clean, WDYT?
>>
>> If we do that then the hw_stats and hw_index parameters will not be
>> available to the offload_act_setup method.
>> AFAIU no tc action actually uses these values (so possibly no
>> regression) but perhaps it is better to leave them initialized.
> thanks for clarify about this, for the use of hw_index and hw_stats in tc_setup_offload_act, since we pass the act to function, I think we can get parameters from act if they are needed.
> What is your opinion?

I agree.
I will send v2.

>>
>>
>>
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		j += index;
>>>> +
>>>> 		spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock);
>>>> 	}
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 9bb4d3dcc994..d07c04096560 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@  int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
 		    struct tc_action *actions[],
 		    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
-	int i, j, index, err = 0;
+	int i, j, k, index, err = 0;
 	struct tc_action *act;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_ANY != FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY);
@@ -3557,10 +3557,19 @@  int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
 		entry->hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
 		index = 0;
 		err = tc_setup_offload_act(act, entry, &index, extack);
-		if (!err)
-			j += index;
-		else
+		if (err)
 			goto err_out_locked;
+
+		/* initialize the generic parameters for actions that
+		 * allocate more than one offload entry per tc action
+		 */
+		for (k = 1; k < index ; k++) {
+			entry[k].hw_stats = tc_act_hw_stats(act->hw_stats);
+			entry[k].hw_index = act->tcfa_index;
+		}
+
+		j += index;
+
 		spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock);
 	}