diff mbox series

[v2,3/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add "refusal mode" to preclude PCIe-induced CPU aborts

Message ID 20220716222454.29914-4-jim2101024@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series PCI: brcmstb: Re-submit reverted patchset | expand

Commit Message

Jim Quinlan July 16, 2022, 10:24 p.m. UTC
Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link
established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space
access causes a CPU abort.  This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe
link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL
address, which in turn precludes the access from happening.

Right now, "refusal mode" is window dressing.  It will become relevant
in a future commit when brcm_pcie_start_link() is invoked during
enumeration instead of before it.

Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Comments

Bjorn Helgaas July 20, 2022, 10:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link
> established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space
> access causes a CPU abort.  This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe
> link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL
> address, which in turn precludes the access from happening.
> 
> Right now, "refusal mode" is window dressing.  It will become relevant
> in a future commit when brcm_pcie_start_link() is invoked during
> enumeration instead of before it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index c026446d5830..72219a4f3964 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
>  	u32			hw_rev;
>  	void			(*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
>  	void			(*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
> +	bool			refusal_mode;
>  };
>  
>  static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -687,6 +688,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>  	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>  		return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where;
>  
> +	if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
> +		/*
> +		 * At this point we do not have PCIe link-up.  If there is
> +		 * a config read or write access besides those targeting
> +		 * the host bridge, our PCIe HW throws a CPU abort.  To
> +		 * prevent this we return the NULL address.  The calling
> +		 * functions -- pci_generic_config_*() -- will notice this
> +		 * and not perform the access, and if it is a read access,
> +		 * 0xffffffff is returned.
> +		 */
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Is this any different from all the other .map_bus() implementations
that return NULL when the link is down?

  cdns_pci_map_bus()
  dw_pcie_other_conf_map_bus()
  nwl_pcie_map_bus() (see nwl_pcie_valid_device())
  xilinx_pcie_map_bus() (see xilinx_pcie_valid_device())

If you can implement this the same way, i.e., using
brcm_pcie_link_up(), it would be nice.

>  	/* For devices, write to the config space index register */
>  	idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, 0);
>  	writel(idx, pcie->base + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX);
> @@ -704,6 +718,11 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devf
>  	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>  		return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + (where & ~0x3);
>  
> +	if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
> +		/* See note above in brcm_pcie_map_conf() */
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* For devices, write to the config space index register */
>  	idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, (where & ~3));
>  	writel(idx, base + IDX_ADDR(pcie));
> @@ -989,6 +1008,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_start_link(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  		dev_err(dev, "link down\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> +	pcie->refusal_mode = false;
>  
>  	if (!brcm_pcie_rc_mode(pcie)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "PCIe misconfigured; is in EP mode\n");
> @@ -1134,6 +1154,8 @@ static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  	void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
>  	int tmp;
>  
> +	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
> +
>  	if (brcm_pcie_link_up(pcie))
>  		brcm_pcie_enter_l23(pcie);
>  	/* Assert fundamental reset */
> @@ -1185,6 +1207,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	u32 tmp;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
>  	base = pcie->base;
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1361,6 +1384,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pcie->type = data->type;
>  	pcie->perst_set = data->perst_set;
>  	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set = data->bridge_sw_init_set;
> +	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
>  
>  	pcie->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pcie->base))
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Bjorn Helgaas July 20, 2022, 10:08 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link
> established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space
> access causes a CPU abort.  This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe
> link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL
> address, which in turn precludes the access from happening.

> @@ -687,6 +688,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,

Oh, and I forgot to mention that brcmstb is one of the few drivers
that doesn't name these functions ".*_map_bus()".  It's helpful when
they all match a simple grep pattern.  Maybe a patch at the end could
fix this.
Jim Quinlan July 21, 2022, 2:53 p.m. UTC | #3
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20171215201434.GY30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:06 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link
> > established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space
> > access causes a CPU abort.  This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe
> > link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL
> > address, which in turn precludes the access from happening.
> >
> > Right now, "refusal mode" is window dressing.  It will become relevant
> > in a future commit when brcm_pcie_start_link() is invoked during
> > enumeration instead of before it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > index c026446d5830..72219a4f3964 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
> >       u32                     hw_rev;
> >       void                    (*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
> >       void                    (*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
> > +     bool                    refusal_mode;
> >  };
> >
> >  static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > @@ -687,6 +688,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> >       if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> >               return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where;
> >
> > +     if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
> > +             /*
> > +              * At this point we do not have PCIe link-up.  If there is
> > +              * a config read or write access besides those targeting
> > +              * the host bridge, our PCIe HW throws a CPU abort.  To
> > +              * prevent this we return the NULL address.  The calling
> > +              * functions -- pci_generic_config_*() -- will notice this
> > +              * and not perform the access, and if it is a read access,
> > +              * 0xffffffff is returned.
> > +              */
> > +             return NULL;
> > +     }
>
> Is this any different from all the other .map_bus() implementations
> that return NULL when the link is down?

Not really,,but long ago I submitted code that gated the config spec
access based on link status and was advised not to do it  [1].
I'll be happy to make it look like the others.

Regards,
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20171215201434.GY30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/

>
>   cdns_pci_map_bus()
>   dw_pcie_other_conf_map_bus()
>   nwl_pcie_map_bus() (see nwl_pcie_valid_device())
>   xilinx_pcie_map_bus() (see xilinx_pcie_valid_device())
>
> If you can implement this the same way, i.e., using
> brcm_pcie_link_up(), it would be nice.
>
> >       /* For devices, write to the config space index register */
> >       idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, 0);
> >       writel(idx, pcie->base + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX);
> > @@ -704,6 +718,11 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devf
> >       if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> >               return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + (where & ~0x3);
> >
> > +     if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
> > +             /* See note above in brcm_pcie_map_conf() */
> > +             return NULL;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       /* For devices, write to the config space index register */
> >       idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, (where & ~3));
> >       writel(idx, base + IDX_ADDR(pcie));
> > @@ -989,6 +1008,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_start_link(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> >               dev_err(dev, "link down\n");
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >       }
> > +     pcie->refusal_mode = false;
> >
> >       if (!brcm_pcie_rc_mode(pcie)) {
> >               dev_err(dev, "PCIe misconfigured; is in EP mode\n");
> > @@ -1134,6 +1154,8 @@ static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> >       void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
> >       int tmp;
> >
> > +     pcie->refusal_mode = true;
> > +
> >       if (brcm_pcie_link_up(pcie))
> >               brcm_pcie_enter_l23(pcie);
> >       /* Assert fundamental reset */
> > @@ -1185,6 +1207,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       u32 tmp;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > +     pcie->refusal_mode = true;
> >       base = pcie->base;
> >       ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
> >       if (ret)
> > @@ -1361,6 +1384,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       pcie->type = data->type;
> >       pcie->perst_set = data->perst_set;
> >       pcie->bridge_sw_init_set = data->bridge_sw_init_set;
> > +     pcie->refusal_mode = true;
> >
> >       pcie->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> >       if (IS_ERR(pcie->base))
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Bjorn Helgaas July 21, 2022, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:53:54AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20171215201434.GY30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:06 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > Our PCIe RC HW has an atypical behavior: if it does not have PCIe link
> > > established between itself and downstream, any subsequent config space
> > > access causes a CPU abort.  This commit sets a "refusal mode" if the PCIe
> > > link-up fails, and this has our pci_ops map_bus function returning a NULL
> > > address, which in turn precludes the access from happening.
> > >
> > > Right now, "refusal mode" is window dressing.  It will become relevant
> > > in a future commit when brcm_pcie_start_link() is invoked during
> > > enumeration instead of before it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > index c026446d5830..72219a4f3964 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
> > >       u32                     hw_rev;
> > >       void                    (*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
> > >       void                    (*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
> > > +     bool                    refusal_mode;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > > @@ -687,6 +688,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> > >       if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> > >               return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where;
> > >
> > > +     if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
> > > +             /*
> > > +              * At this point we do not have PCIe link-up.  If there is
> > > +              * a config read or write access besides those targeting
> > > +              * the host bridge, our PCIe HW throws a CPU abort.  To
> > > +              * prevent this we return the NULL address.  The calling
> > > +              * functions -- pci_generic_config_*() -- will notice this
> > > +              * and not perform the access, and if it is a read access,
> > > +              * 0xffffffff is returned.
> > > +              */
> > > +             return NULL;
> > > +     }
> >
> > Is this any different from all the other .map_bus() implementations
> > that return NULL when the link is down?
> 
> Not really, but long ago I submitted code that gated the config spec
> access based on link status and was advised not to do it  [1].
> I'll be happy to make it look like the others.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20171215201434.GY30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/

My point there was that if you can deal with the abort cleanly, that's
the best approach.  Apparently brcmstb can't recover cleanly, so you
have to settle for the 99% solution.

The refusal_mode approach has the same race as checking
*_pcie_link_up(), since the link may go down between the time
brcm_pcie_start_link() sees that it is up and the time somebody does a
config access:

  brcm_pcie_start_link
    pcie->refusal_mode = false

  <link goes down>

  brcm_pcie_map_conf
    if (pcie->refusal_mode)            # still false

  <config access causes abort>

So there's no advantage in making the code look different.  Checking
for link-up in the config access path can never completely remove the
window, but it does make it smaller than using refusal_mode.

Bjorn
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index c026446d5830..72219a4f3964 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@  struct brcm_pcie {
 	u32			hw_rev;
 	void			(*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
 	void			(*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
+	bool			refusal_mode;
 };
 
 static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
@@ -687,6 +688,19 @@  static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
 	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
 		return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + where;
 
+	if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
+		/*
+		 * At this point we do not have PCIe link-up.  If there is
+		 * a config read or write access besides those targeting
+		 * the host bridge, our PCIe HW throws a CPU abort.  To
+		 * prevent this we return the NULL address.  The calling
+		 * functions -- pci_generic_config_*() -- will notice this
+		 * and not perform the access, and if it is a read access,
+		 * 0xffffffff is returned.
+		 */
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	/* For devices, write to the config space index register */
 	idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, 0);
 	writel(idx, pcie->base + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX);
@@ -704,6 +718,11 @@  static void __iomem *brcm_pcie_map_conf32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devf
 	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
 		return PCI_SLOT(devfn) ? NULL : base + (where & ~0x3);
 
+	if (pcie->refusal_mode) {
+		/* See note above in brcm_pcie_map_conf() */
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	/* For devices, write to the config space index register */
 	idx = PCIE_ECAM_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn, (where & ~3));
 	writel(idx, base + IDX_ADDR(pcie));
@@ -989,6 +1008,7 @@  static int brcm_pcie_start_link(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 		dev_err(dev, "link down\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
+	pcie->refusal_mode = false;
 
 	if (!brcm_pcie_rc_mode(pcie)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "PCIe misconfigured; is in EP mode\n");
@@ -1134,6 +1154,8 @@  static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 	void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
 	int tmp;
 
+	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
+
 	if (brcm_pcie_link_up(pcie))
 		brcm_pcie_enter_l23(pcie);
 	/* Assert fundamental reset */
@@ -1185,6 +1207,7 @@  static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
 	u32 tmp;
 	int ret;
 
+	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
 	base = pcie->base;
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1361,6 +1384,7 @@  static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pcie->type = data->type;
 	pcie->perst_set = data->perst_set;
 	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set = data->bridge_sw_init_set;
+	pcie->refusal_mode = true;
 
 	pcie->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(pcie->base))