Message ID | 20220810154618.307275-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mergetools: vimdiff: regression fixes and improvements | expand |
On 22/08/10 10:46AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hello, > > These patches make vimdiff3 actually work, along with many single window > cases. > Thanks Felipe. In this new v4 the code is even cleaner. I also manually re-tested all the cases (with and without .vimrc) and verified they work as expected. Reviewed-by: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu> PS to Junio: Is it OK to reply with "Reviewed-by" to the cover letter or (for the next time) should I had individually replied to each of the patches in the series? Thanks!
Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu> writes: > On 22/08/10 10:46AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Hello, >> >> These patches make vimdiff3 actually work, along with many single window >> cases. >> > > Thanks Felipe. In this new v4 the code is even cleaner. > > I also manually re-tested all the cases (with and without .vimrc) and verified > they work as expected. > > Reviewed-by: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu> > > > PS to Junio: Is it OK to reply with "Reviewed-by" to the cover letter or (for > the next time) should I had individually replied to each of the patches in the > series? Thanks! You did just fine. I'll queue with your reviewed-by. Thanks, both.