diff mbox series

[v2,12/16] hwmon: (mr75203) modify the temperature equation

Message ID 20220817054321.6519-13-farbere@amazon.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series Variety of fixes and new features for mr75203 driver | expand

Commit Message

Farber, Eliav Aug. 17, 2022, 5:43 a.m. UTC
Modify the equation and coefficients to convert the digital output to
temperature according to series 5 of the Moortec Embedded Temperature
Sensor (METS) datasheet:
T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F

The G, H and J coefficients are multiplied by 1000 to get the temperature
in milli-Celsius.

Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Guenter Roeck Aug. 18, 2022, 8:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:43:17AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
> Modify the equation and coefficients to convert the digital output to
> temperature according to series 5 of the Moortec Embedded Temperature
> Sensor (METS) datasheet:
> T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F
> 
> The G, H and J coefficients are multiplied by 1000 to get the temperature
> in milli-Celsius.
> 

This is, at the very least, confusing. It doesn't explain the discrepancy
to the old code nor the change in constant values. I have no idea if this
change would result in erroneous readings on some other system where
the existing calculation may be the correct one.

On top of that, it seems overflow-prune in 32 bit systems.

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
> index e3191f590167..e500897585e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
> @@ -102,9 +102,10 @@
>  
>  #define PVT_POLL_DELAY_US	20
>  #define PVT_POLL_TIMEOUT_US	20000
> -#define PVT_H_CONST		100000
> -#define PVT_CAL5_CONST		2047
> -#define PVT_G_CONST		40000
> +#define PVT_H_CONST		60000
> +#define PVT_G_CONST		200000
> +#define PVT_J_CONST		-100
> +#define PVT_CAL5_CONST		4094
>  #define PVT_CONV_BITS		10
>  #define PVT_N_CONST		90
>  #define PVT_R_CONST		245805
> @@ -158,7 +159,6 @@ static int pvt_read_temp(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
>  	struct regmap *t_map = pvt->t_map;
>  	u32 stat, nbs;
>  	int ret;
> -	u64 tmp;
>  
>  	switch (attr) {
>  	case hwmon_temp_input:
> @@ -176,12 +176,13 @@ static int pvt_read_temp(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
>  		nbs &= SAMPLE_DATA_MSK;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Convert the register value to
> -		 * degrees centigrade temperature
> +		 * Convert the register value to degrees centigrade temperature:
> +		 * T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F
>  		 */
> -		tmp = nbs * PVT_H_CONST;
> -		do_div(tmp, PVT_CAL5_CONST);
> -		*val = tmp - PVT_G_CONST - pvt->ip_freq;
> +		*val = PVT_G_CONST;
> +		*val += PVT_H_CONST * nbs / PVT_CAL5_CONST;
> +		*val -= PVT_H_CONST / 2;
> +		*val += PVT_J_CONST * pvt->ip_freq / HZ_PER_MHZ;
>  
>  		return 0;
>  	default:
> @@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ static int pvt_init(struct pvt_device *pvt)
>  		    (key >> 1) << CLK_SYNTH_HI_SFT |
>  		    (key >> 1) << CLK_SYNTH_HOLD_SFT | CLK_SYNTH_EN;
>  
> -	pvt->ip_freq = sys_freq * 100 / (key + 2);
> +	pvt->ip_freq = clk_get_rate(pvt->clk) / (key + 2);
>  
>  	if (t_num) {
>  		ret = regmap_write(t_map, SDIF_SMPL_CTRL, 0x0);
Farber, Eliav Aug. 19, 2022, 7:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On 8/18/2022 11:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:43:17AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
>> Modify the equation and coefficients to convert the digital output to
>> temperature according to series 5 of the Moortec Embedded Temperature
>> Sensor (METS) datasheet:
>> T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F
>>
>> The G, H and J coefficients are multiplied by 1000 to get the 
>> temperature
>> in milli-Celsius.
>>
>
> This is, at the very least, confusing. It doesn't explain the discrepancy
> to the old code nor the change in constant values. I have no idea if this
> change would result in erroneous readings on some other system where
> the existing calculation may be the correct one.

When I tested the driver it was also not clear to me why the equation
and coefficients in the code don't match the specifications in the data
sheet.
I reached out to Maxlinear engineers (@rtanwar) and they also couldn't
explain the discrepancy.
After further correspondence I aligned both the equation and coefficients
in the driver code to the equation and coefficients defined in series 5
of the Moortec Embedded Temperature Sensor (METS) datasheet which they
provided.

> On top of that, it seems overflow-prune in 32 bit systems.

I'll check if it can overflow, and if it can I'll fix in next version.

--
Regards, Eliav
Guenter Roeck Aug. 19, 2022, 11:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:44:06AM +0300, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> On 8/18/2022 11:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:43:17AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
> > > Modify the equation and coefficients to convert the digital output to
> > > temperature according to series 5 of the Moortec Embedded Temperature
> > > Sensor (METS) datasheet:
> > > T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F
> > > 
> > > The G, H and J coefficients are multiplied by 1000 to get the
> > > temperature
> > > in milli-Celsius.
> > > 
> > 
> > This is, at the very least, confusing. It doesn't explain the discrepancy
> > to the old code nor the change in constant values. I have no idea if this
> > change would result in erroneous readings on some other system where
> > the existing calculation may be the correct one.
> 
> When I tested the driver it was also not clear to me why the equation
> and coefficients in the code don't match the specifications in the data
> sheet.
> I reached out to Maxlinear engineers (@rtanwar) and they also couldn't
> explain the discrepancy.
> After further correspondence I aligned both the equation and coefficients
> in the driver code to the equation and coefficients defined in series 5
> of the Moortec Embedded Temperature Sensor (METS) datasheet which they
> provided.
> 

At least some of the discrepancy is because the original code is more
optimized and avoids overflow. Either case, the above needs to be explained
in the commit description.

> > On top of that, it seems overflow-prune in 32 bit systems.
> 
> I'll check if it can overflow, and if it can I'll fix in next version.
> 
> --
> Regards, Eliav
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
index e3191f590167..e500897585e4 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
@@ -102,9 +102,10 @@ 
 
 #define PVT_POLL_DELAY_US	20
 #define PVT_POLL_TIMEOUT_US	20000
-#define PVT_H_CONST		100000
-#define PVT_CAL5_CONST		2047
-#define PVT_G_CONST		40000
+#define PVT_H_CONST		60000
+#define PVT_G_CONST		200000
+#define PVT_J_CONST		-100
+#define PVT_CAL5_CONST		4094
 #define PVT_CONV_BITS		10
 #define PVT_N_CONST		90
 #define PVT_R_CONST		245805
@@ -158,7 +159,6 @@  static int pvt_read_temp(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
 	struct regmap *t_map = pvt->t_map;
 	u32 stat, nbs;
 	int ret;
-	u64 tmp;
 
 	switch (attr) {
 	case hwmon_temp_input:
@@ -176,12 +176,13 @@  static int pvt_read_temp(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
 		nbs &= SAMPLE_DATA_MSK;
 
 		/*
-		 * Convert the register value to
-		 * degrees centigrade temperature
+		 * Convert the register value to degrees centigrade temperature:
+		 * T = G + H * (n / cal5 - 0.5) + J * F
 		 */
-		tmp = nbs * PVT_H_CONST;
-		do_div(tmp, PVT_CAL5_CONST);
-		*val = tmp - PVT_G_CONST - pvt->ip_freq;
+		*val = PVT_G_CONST;
+		*val += PVT_H_CONST * nbs / PVT_CAL5_CONST;
+		*val -= PVT_H_CONST / 2;
+		*val += PVT_J_CONST * pvt->ip_freq / HZ_PER_MHZ;
 
 		return 0;
 	default:
@@ -313,7 +314,7 @@  static int pvt_init(struct pvt_device *pvt)
 		    (key >> 1) << CLK_SYNTH_HI_SFT |
 		    (key >> 1) << CLK_SYNTH_HOLD_SFT | CLK_SYNTH_EN;
 
-	pvt->ip_freq = sys_freq * 100 / (key + 2);
+	pvt->ip_freq = clk_get_rate(pvt->clk) / (key + 2);
 
 	if (t_num) {
 		ret = regmap_write(t_map, SDIF_SMPL_CTRL, 0x0);