Message ID | 20220824121523.1291269-1-hdegoede@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display | expand |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > Before this commit when we want userspace to use the acpi_video backlight > device we register both the GPU's native backlight device and acpi_video's > firmware acpi_video# backlight device. This relies on userspace preferring > firmware type backlight devices over native ones. > > Registering 2 backlight devices for a single display really is > undesirable, don't register the GPU's native backlight device when > another backlight device should be used. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > index 681ebcda97ad..a4dd7924e0c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ > #include <linux/pwm.h> > #include <linux/string_helpers.h> > > +#include <acpi/video.h> > + > #include "intel_backlight.h" > #include "intel_backlight_regs.h" > #include "intel_connector.h" > @@ -952,6 +954,11 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct intel_connector *connector) > > WARN_ON(panel->backlight.max == 0); > > + if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native()) { > + DRM_INFO("Skipping intel_backlight registration\n"); Could use drm_info with drm_device. Either way, Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> and ack for merging via whichever tree suits you best. > + return 0; > + } > + > memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props)); > props.type = BACKLIGHT_RAW;
Hi All, On 8/24/22 14:50, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: >> Before this commit when we want userspace to use the acpi_video backlight >> device we register both the GPU's native backlight device and acpi_video's >> firmware acpi_video# backlight device. This relies on userspace preferring >> firmware type backlight devices over native ones. >> >> Registering 2 backlight devices for a single display really is >> undesirable, don't register the GPU's native backlight device when >> another backlight device should be used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c >> index 681ebcda97ad..a4dd7924e0c1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c >> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ >> #include <linux/pwm.h> >> #include <linux/string_helpers.h> >> >> +#include <acpi/video.h> >> + >> #include "intel_backlight.h" >> #include "intel_backlight_regs.h" >> #include "intel_connector.h" >> @@ -952,6 +954,11 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct intel_connector *connector) >> >> WARN_ON(panel->backlight.max == 0); >> >> + if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native()) { >> + DRM_INFO("Skipping intel_backlight registration\n"); > > Could use drm_info with drm_device. Ack, fixed for v5. > Either way, > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Thank you. > and ack for merging via whichever tree suits you best. My plan is to create a branch with the series on top of 6.0-rc1 and then send a pull-req to all involved trees. So far there are no conflicts between this branch and drm-tip... Regards, Hans >> + return 0; >> + } >> + >> memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props)); >> props.type = BACKLIGHT_RAW; >