diff mbox series

[v1,3/3] iio: adc: tsc2046: silent spi_device_id warning

Message ID 20220830110709.2037302-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v1,1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ti,tsc2046: add vref-supply property | expand

Commit Message

Oleksij Rempel Aug. 30, 2022, 11:07 a.m. UTC
Add spi_device_id to silent following warning:
 SPI driver tsc2046 has no spi_device_id for ti,tsc2046e-adc

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jonathan Cameron Aug. 30, 2022, 1:02 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:07:09 +0200
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Add spi_device_id to silent following warning:
>  SPI driver tsc2046 has no spi_device_id for ti,tsc2046e-adc
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> index bbc8b4137b0b1..b9a1fac659d46 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> @@ -761,7 +761,15 @@ static int tsc2046_adc_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!dev_fwnode(dev)) {
> +		const struct spi_device_id *id;
> +
> +		id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
> +		dcfg = (const struct tsc2046_adc_dcfg *)id->driver_data;

Driver data not set below.

Otherwise this looks good to me.  An alternative more common form (I think...)
is call device_get_match_data() unconditionally and if that is null follow
the driver_data path. Either way is fine though.

Could you add to the patch description where
the warning is coming from?   Build time / runtime etc and what tool?

Thanks,

Jonathan


> +	} else {
> +		dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!dcfg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -878,11 +886,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id ads7950_of_table[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ads7950_of_table);
>  
> +static const struct spi_device_id tsc2046_adc_spi_ids[] = {
> +	{ "tsc2046e-adc" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, tsc2046_adc_spi_ids);
> +
>  static struct spi_driver tsc2046_adc_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "tsc2046",
>  		.of_match_table = ads7950_of_table,
>  	},
> +	.id_table = tsc2046_adc_spi_ids,
>  	.probe = tsc2046_adc_probe,
>  	.remove = tsc2046_adc_remove,
>  };
Oleksij Rempel Aug. 30, 2022, 4:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:02:28PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:07:09 +0200
> Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > Add spi_device_id to silent following warning:
> >  SPI driver tsc2046 has no spi_device_id for ti,tsc2046e-adc
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> > index bbc8b4137b0b1..b9a1fac659d46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> > @@ -761,7 +761,15 @@ static int tsc2046_adc_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	if (!dev_fwnode(dev)) {
> > +		const struct spi_device_id *id;
> > +
> > +		id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
> > +		dcfg = (const struct tsc2046_adc_dcfg *)id->driver_data;
> 
> Driver data not set below.

..facepalm..

> Otherwise this looks good to me.  An alternative more common form (I think...)
> is call device_get_match_data() unconditionally and if that is null follow
> the driver_data path. Either way is fine though.
> 
> Could you add to the patch description where
> the warning is coming from?   Build time / runtime etc and what tool?

ack. It is runtime warning in the kernel log.

Regards,
Oleksij
Andy Shevchenko Aug. 30, 2022, 8:02 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:19 PM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Add spi_device_id to silent following warning:
>  SPI driver tsc2046 has no spi_device_id for ti,tsc2046e-adc

Missed period.

...

> -       dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);

Why remove this and duplicate the check below with the inverted conditional?

> +       if (!dev_fwnode(dev)) {
> +               const struct spi_device_id *id;
> +
> +               id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
> +               dcfg = (const struct tsc2046_adc_dcfg *)id->driver_data;
> +       } else {
> +               dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +       }

if (!dcfg) {
  ...try SPI ID...
}
if (!dfg)
  return -E...
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
index bbc8b4137b0b1..b9a1fac659d46 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
@@ -761,7 +761,15 @@  static int tsc2046_adc_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!dev_fwnode(dev)) {
+		const struct spi_device_id *id;
+
+		id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
+		dcfg = (const struct tsc2046_adc_dcfg *)id->driver_data;
+	} else {
+		dcfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	}
+
 	if (!dcfg)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -878,11 +886,18 @@  static const struct of_device_id ads7950_of_table[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ads7950_of_table);
 
+static const struct spi_device_id tsc2046_adc_spi_ids[] = {
+	{ "tsc2046e-adc" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, tsc2046_adc_spi_ids);
+
 static struct spi_driver tsc2046_adc_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "tsc2046",
 		.of_match_table = ads7950_of_table,
 	},
+	.id_table = tsc2046_adc_spi_ids,
 	.probe = tsc2046_adc_probe,
 	.remove = tsc2046_adc_remove,
 };