| Message ID | 20220830182001.3693030-1-gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v1] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake support to pmc core driver | expand |
Acked-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:20 PM Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core > driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), > {} > }; > > > base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5 > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 8/30/2022 4:09 PM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote: > Acked-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com> Thank you Rajneesh! > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:20 PM Gayatri Kammela > <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core >> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. >> >> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >> {} >> }; >> >> >> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5 >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >
Hi, On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote: > Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core > driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next merge-window. Regards, Hans > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c > @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), > X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), > {} > }; > > > base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
Hi, On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote: >> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core >> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. >> >> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> > > Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans > branch: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29: ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’? 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’ 46 | .model = _model, \ | ^~~~~~ ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’ 129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’ 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’ 1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1 And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros. Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree: Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Regards, Hans >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >> {} >> }; >> >> >> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote: >>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core >>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. >>> >>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> >>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> >> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans >> branch: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans > In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29: > ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’? > 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’ > 46 | .model = _model, \ > | ^~~~~~ > ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’ > 129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’ > 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’ > 1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1 > > And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new > INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros. > > Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree: > > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > > Regards, > > Hans Hi Hans! Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared. patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number". I made sure its built without errors before sending it out. > > > >>> --- >>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { >>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), >>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), >>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >>> {} >>> }; >>> >>> >>> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
Hi, On 9/1/22 19:32, Kammela, Gayatri wrote: > On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote: >>>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core >>>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. >>>> >>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> >>>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >>>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> >>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans >>> branch: >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans >> In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29: >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’? >> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’ >> 46 | .model = _model, \ >> | ^~~~~~ >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’ >> 129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \ >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’ >> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’ >> 1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1 >> >> And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new >> INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros. >> >> Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree: >> >> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > Hi Hans! > > Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared. > > patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number". > > I made sure its built without errors before sending it out. Ah I see, but my tree (like most trees) is based on 6.0-rc1, please submit this patch to the same tree as through which ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 went upstream, with my Acked-by added. Thanks, Hans > >> >> >> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { >>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), >>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), >>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >>>> {} >>>> }; >>>> >>>> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5 >
On 9/2/2022 1:55 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/1/22 19:32, Kammela, Gayatri wrote: >> On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote: >>>>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core >>>>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> >>>>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >>>>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> >>>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans >>>> branch: >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans >>> In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29: >>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’? >>> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’ >>> 46 | .model = _model, \ >>> | ^~~~~~ >>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’ >>> 129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \ >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’ >>> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data) >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’ >>> 1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1 >>> >>> And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new >>> INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros. >>> >>> Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree: >>> >>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Hans >> Hi Hans! >> >> Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared. >> >> patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number". >> >> I made sure its built without errors before sending it out. > Ah I see, but my tree (like most trees) is based on 6.0-rc1, > please submit this patch to the same tree as through which > ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 went upstream, > with my Acked-by added. > > Thanks, > > Hans Hi Hans! I did send v2 based on review-hans branch with dependency patch included. Sorry for the delay and thank you! > > > >>> >>> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>>> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c >>>>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { >>>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), >>>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), >>>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), >>>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), >>>>> {} >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map), {} };
Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs. Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5