mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,0/3] fixes for concurrent htab updates

Message ID 20220831042629.130006-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series fixes for concurrent htab updates | expand

Message

Hou Tao Aug. 31, 2022, 4:26 a.m. UTC
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Hi,

The patchset aims to fix the issues found during investigating the
syzkaller problem reported in [0]. It seems that the concurrent updates
to the same hash-table bucket may fail as shown in patch 1.

Patch 1 uses preempt_disable() to fix the problem for
htab_use_raw_lock() case. For !htab_use_raw_lock() case, the problem is
left to "BPF specific memory allocator" patchset [1] in which
!htab_use_raw_lock() will be removed.

Patch 2 fixes the out-of-bound memory read problem reported in [0]. The
problem has the root cause as patch 1 and it is fixed by handling -EBUSY
from htab_lock_bucket() correctly.

Patch 3 add two cases for hash-table update: one for the reentrancy of
bpf_map_update_elem(), and another one for concurrent updates of the
same hash-table bucket.

Comments are always welcome.

Regards,
Tao

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsbuxaR6cv0kXJoVnBfL9ZJXjjoUcMpw_Ogc313jSrg14A@mail.gmail.com/
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220819214232.18784-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/

Change Log:

v4:
 * rebased on bpf-next
 * add htab_update to DENYLIST.s390x

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220829023709.1958204-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/
 * patch 1: update commit message and add Fixes tag
 * patch 2: add Fixes tag
 * patch 3: elaborate the description of test cases

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/bd60ef93-1c6a-2db2-557d-b09b92ad22bd@huaweicloud.com/
 * Note the fix is for CONFIG_PREEMPT case in commit message and add
   Reviewed-by tag for patch 1
 * Drop patch "bpf: Allow normally concurrent map updates for !htab_use_raw_lock() case"

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220821033223.2598791-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/

Hou Tao (3):
  bpf: Disable preemption when increasing per-cpu map_locked
  bpf: Propagate error from htab_lock_bucket() to userspace
  selftests/bpf: Add test cases for htab update

 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          |  30 ++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x    |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_update.c    | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_update.c |  29 ++++
 4 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_update.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_update.c

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 31, 2022, 9:20 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:26:26 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The patchset aims to fix the issues found during investigating the
> syzkaller problem reported in [0]. It seems that the concurrent updates
> to the same hash-table bucket may fail as shown in patch 1.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/3] bpf: Disable preemption when increasing per-cpu map_locked
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2775da216287
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/3] bpf: Propagate error from htab_lock_bucket() to userspace
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/66a7a92e4d0d
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for htab update
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1c636b6277a2

You are awesome, thank you!