Message ID | 20220831041843.973026-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | convert most filesystems to pin_user_pages_fast() | expand |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:18:36PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > The conversion is temporarily guarded by > CONFIG_BLK_USE_PIN_USER_PAGES_FOR_DIO. In the future (not part of this > series), when we are certain that all filesystems have converted their > Direct IO paths to FOLL_PIN, then we can do the final step, which is to > get rid of CONFIG_BLK_USE_PIN_USER_PAGES_FOR_DIO and search-and-replace > the dio_w_*() functions with their final names (see bvec.h changes). What is the the point of these wrappers? We should be able to convert one caller at a time in an entirely safe way.
On 9/5/22 23:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:18:36PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> The conversion is temporarily guarded by >> CONFIG_BLK_USE_PIN_USER_PAGES_FOR_DIO. In the future (not part of this >> series), when we are certain that all filesystems have converted their >> Direct IO paths to FOLL_PIN, then we can do the final step, which is to >> get rid of CONFIG_BLK_USE_PIN_USER_PAGES_FOR_DIO and search-and-replace >> the dio_w_*() functions with their final names (see bvec.h changes). > > What is the the point of these wrappers? We should be able to > convert one caller at a time in an entirely safe way. I would be delighted if that were somehow possible. Every time I think it's possible, it has fallen apart. The fact that bio_release_pages() will need to switch over from put_page() to unpin_user_page(), combined with the fact that there are a lot of callers that submit bios, has led me to the current approach. What did you have in mind? thanks,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:10:54AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > I would be delighted if that were somehow possible. Every time I think > it's possible, it has fallen apart. The fact that bio_release_pages() > will need to switch over from put_page() to unpin_user_page(), combined > with the fact that there are a lot of callers that submit bios, has > led me to the current approach. We can (temporarily) pass the gup flag to bio_release_pages or even better add a new bio_unpin_pages helper that undoes the pin side. That is: don't try to reuse the old APIs, but ad new ones, just like we do on the lower layers.
On 9/6/22 00:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:10:54AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> I would be delighted if that were somehow possible. Every time I think >> it's possible, it has fallen apart. The fact that bio_release_pages() >> will need to switch over from put_page() to unpin_user_page(), combined >> with the fact that there are a lot of callers that submit bios, has >> led me to the current approach. > > We can (temporarily) pass the gup flag to bio_release_pages or even > better add a new bio_unpin_pages helper that undoes the pin side. > That is: don't try to reuse the old APIs, but ad new ones, just like > we do on the lower layers. OK...so, to confirm: the idea is to convert these callsites (below) to call a new bio_unpin_pages() routine that does unpin_user_page(). $ git grep -nw bio_release_pages block/bio.c:1474: bio_release_pages(bio, true); block/bio.c:1490: bio_release_pages(bio, false); block/blk-map.c:308: bio_release_pages(bio, false); block/blk-map.c:610: bio_release_pages(bio, bio_data_dir(bio) == READ); block/fops.c:99: bio_release_pages(&bio, should_dirty); block/fops.c:165: bio_release_pages(bio, false); block/fops.c:289: bio_release_pages(bio, false); fs/direct-io.c:510: bio_release_pages(bio, should_dirty); fs/iomap/direct-io.c:185: bio_release_pages(bio, false); fs/zonefs/super.c:793: bio_release_pages(bio, false); And these can probably be done in groups, not as one big patch--your other email also asked to break them up into block, iomap, and legacy. That would be nice, I really hate the ugly dio_w*() wrappers, thanks for this help. :) thanks,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:37:00AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 9/6/22 00:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:10:54AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > >> I would be delighted if that were somehow possible. Every time I think > >> it's possible, it has fallen apart. The fact that bio_release_pages() > >> will need to switch over from put_page() to unpin_user_page(), combined > >> with the fact that there are a lot of callers that submit bios, has > >> led me to the current approach. > > > > We can (temporarily) pass the gup flag to bio_release_pages or even > > better add a new bio_unpin_pages helper that undoes the pin side. > > That is: don't try to reuse the old APIs, but ad new ones, just like > > we do on the lower layers. > > OK...so, to confirm: the idea is to convert these callsites (below) to > call a new bio_unpin_pages() routine that does unpin_user_page(). Yeah. And to stay symmetric also a new bio_iov_iter_pin_pages for the pin side.