diff mbox series

[2/2] input: touchscreen: elants_i2c: Add eth3915n touchscreen chip

Message ID 20220902082843.2.I19ac6cf9b8502d92f551ff4166861debb14576ec@changeid (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/2] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: elants_i2c: Add eth3915n touchscreen chip | expand

Commit Message

Yunlong Jia Sept. 2, 2022, 8:32 a.m. UTC
The eth3915n requires more delay time than the eth3500 when reset.
Define EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC as the reset delay time of eth3915n,
about 300ms.

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@ecs.corp-partner.google.com>

---

 drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Doug Anderson Sept. 6, 2022, 10:28 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:33 AM Yunlong Jia
<yunlong.jia@ecs.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> The eth3915n requires more delay time than the eth3500 when reset.
> Define EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC as the reset delay time of eth3915n,
> about 300ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@ecs.corp-partner.google.com>
>
> ---
>
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
> index c9dd703b0c7d8..60ddb58281bdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
>
>  #define ELAN_POWERON_DELAY_USEC        500
>  #define ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC  20
> +#define EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC      300
>
>  /* FW boot code version */
>  #define BC_VER_H_BYTE_FOR_EKTH3900x1_I2C        0x72
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@
>  enum elants_chip_id {
>         EKTH3500,
>         EKTF3624,
> +       EKTH3915,
>  };
>
>  enum elants_state {
> @@ -664,6 +666,7 @@ static int elants_i2c_initialize(struct elants_data *ts)
>
>         switch (ts->chip_id) {
>         case EKTH3500:
> +       case EKTH3915:
>                 if (!error)
>                         error = elants_i2c_query_ts_info_ekth(ts);
>                 break;
> @@ -1361,7 +1364,17 @@ static int elants_i2c_power_on(struct elants_data *ts)
>         if (error)
>                 return error;
>
> -       msleep(ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
> +       if (ts->chip_id == EKTH3915)
> +               /*
> +                * There need delay 300ms for power on sequence.
> +                * T1 + T2 + T3 >= 305 ms
> +                * T1: 0<time<500us
> +                * T2: >5ms
> +                * T3: >300ms
> +                */
> +               msleep(EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
> +       else
> +               msleep(ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1686,6 +1699,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id elants_i2c_id[] = {
>         { DEVICE_NAME, EKTH3500 },
>         { "ekth3500", EKTH3500 },
>         { "ektf3624", EKTF3624 },
> +       { "ekth3915", EKTH3915 },
>         { }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, elants_i2c_id);
> @@ -1702,6 +1716,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, elants_acpi_id);
>  static const struct of_device_id elants_of_match[] = {
>         { .compatible = "elan,ekth3500", .data = (void *)EKTH3500 },
>         { .compatible = "elan,ektf3624", .data = (void *)EKTF3624 },
> +       { .compatible = "elan,ekth3915", .data = (void *)EKTH3915 },

Adding giant delays isn't my favorite, but it seems like the trend in
touchscreens is that newer ones take forever to power up. I guess this
is no exception. FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
index c9dd703b0c7d8..60ddb58281bdf 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ 
 
 #define ELAN_POWERON_DELAY_USEC	500
 #define ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC	20
+#define EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC	300
 
 /* FW boot code version */
 #define BC_VER_H_BYTE_FOR_EKTH3900x1_I2C        0x72
@@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ 
 enum elants_chip_id {
 	EKTH3500,
 	EKTF3624,
+	EKTH3915,
 };
 
 enum elants_state {
@@ -664,6 +666,7 @@  static int elants_i2c_initialize(struct elants_data *ts)
 
 	switch (ts->chip_id) {
 	case EKTH3500:
+	case EKTH3915:
 		if (!error)
 			error = elants_i2c_query_ts_info_ekth(ts);
 		break;
@@ -1361,7 +1364,17 @@  static int elants_i2c_power_on(struct elants_data *ts)
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 
-	msleep(ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
+	if (ts->chip_id == EKTH3915)
+		/*
+		 * There need delay 300ms for power on sequence.
+		 * T1 + T2 + T3 >= 305 ms
+		 * T1: 0<time<500us
+		 * T2: >5ms
+		 * T3: >300ms
+		 */
+		msleep(EKTH3915_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
+	else
+		msleep(ELAN_RESET_DELAY_MSEC);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1686,6 +1699,7 @@  static const struct i2c_device_id elants_i2c_id[] = {
 	{ DEVICE_NAME, EKTH3500 },
 	{ "ekth3500", EKTH3500 },
 	{ "ektf3624", EKTF3624 },
+	{ "ekth3915", EKTH3915 },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, elants_i2c_id);
@@ -1702,6 +1716,7 @@  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, elants_acpi_id);
 static const struct of_device_id elants_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "elan,ekth3500", .data = (void *)EKTH3500 },
 	{ .compatible = "elan,ektf3624", .data = (void *)EKTF3624 },
+	{ .compatible = "elan,ekth3915", .data = (void *)EKTH3915 },
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, elants_of_match);