diff mbox series

[bpf-next] samples/bpf: Replace blk_account_io_done() with __blk_account_io_done()

Message ID tencent_1CC476835C219FACD84B6715F0D785517E07@qq.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit bc069da65eec7b5113b40432930152c9c1cd7f88
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] samples/bpf: Replace blk_account_io_done() with __blk_account_io_done() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 12 of 12 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>' != 'Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>'
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Rong Tao Sept. 11, 2022, 1:03 p.m. UTC 
From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>

Since commit be6bfe36db17 ("block: inline hot paths of blk_account_io_*()")
blk_account_io_*() become inline functions.

Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>
---
 samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c | 2 +-
 samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c | 2 +-
 samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c       | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song Sept. 20, 2022, 12:12 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 9/11/22 6:03 AM, Rong Tao wrote:
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> 
> Since commit be6bfe36db17 ("block: inline hot paths of blk_account_io_*()")
> blk_account_io_*() become inline functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Sept. 21, 2022, 12:30 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 21:03:30 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> 
> Since commit be6bfe36db17 ("block: inline hot paths of blk_account_io_*()")
> blk_account_io_*() become inline functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] samples/bpf: Replace blk_account_io_done() with __blk_account_io_done()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bc069da65eec

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
index c821294e1774..186ac0a79c0a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@  int bpf_prog1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-SEC("kretprobe/blk_account_io_done")
+SEC("kretprobe/__blk_account_io_done")
 int bpf_prog2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
index 424718c0872c..a33d74bd3a4b 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	/* test two functions in the corresponding *_kern.c file */
 	CHECK_AND_RET(test_debug_fs_kprobe(0, "blk_mq_start_request",
 					   BPF_FD_TYPE_KPROBE));
-	CHECK_AND_RET(test_debug_fs_kprobe(1, "blk_account_io_done",
+	CHECK_AND_RET(test_debug_fs_kprobe(1, "__blk_account_io_done",
 					   BPF_FD_TYPE_KRETPROBE));
 
 	/* test nondebug fs kprobe */
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c b/samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c
index 710a4410b2fb..bde6591cb20c 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@  struct {
 	__uint(max_entries, SLOTS);
 } lat_map SEC(".maps");
 
-SEC("kprobe/blk_account_io_done")
+SEC("kprobe/__blk_account_io_done")
 int bpf_prog2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
 	long rq = PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx);