| Message ID | YzIcZ11k8RiQtS2T@work (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | b264ef796959cb65cdbc811da5ab950e33df4162 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [next] ASoC: SOF: control.h: Replace zero-length array with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper | expand |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting > C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays > declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() > helper macro. > > This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193 > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/211 > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting > C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays > declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() > helper macro. > > This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more difficult to apply patches.
On 9/26/22 17:12, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting >> C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays >> declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() >> helper macro. >> >> This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. > > As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the > maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel > workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't > copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more > difficult to apply patches. That's exactly what I intended to do: $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback include/sound/sof/control.h Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> (maintainer:SOUND) Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> (maintainer:SOUND) alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (moderated list:SOUND) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Did you see anything wrong with this or something...? Thanks -- Gustavo
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:27:41PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On 9/26/22 17:12, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the > > maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel > > workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't > > copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more > > difficult to apply patches. > That's exactly what I intended to do: > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback include/sound/sof/control.h > > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> (maintainer:SOUND) > > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> (maintainer:SOUND) > > alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (moderated list:SOUND) > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > Did you see anything wrong with this or something...? Yes, you should've also included me and the SOF maintainers. It looks like the MAINTAINERS patterns aren't entirely up to date there unfortunately. Though that said given that you'd picked up on the subject line I'd have expected the signoffs on the commits to also be pointing at the right tree as well.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:39:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:27:41PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > On 9/26/22 17:12, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the > > > maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel > > > workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't > > > copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more > > > difficult to apply patches. > > > That's exactly what I intended to do: > > > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback include/sound/sof/control.h > > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> (maintainer:SOUND) > > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> (maintainer:SOUND) > > alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (moderated list:SOUND) > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > > > Did you see anything wrong with this or something...? > > Yes, you should've also included me and the SOF maintainers. It looks > like the MAINTAINERS patterns aren't entirely up to date there > unfortunately. Though that said given that you'd picked up on the > subject line I'd have expected the signoffs on the commits to also be > pointing at the right tree as well. Subject line heuristics look at X-many commits, but it looks like get_maintainers stops looking at git history by default after 1 year, which seems kind of odd. I had to work at it to get it to emit your name. :) scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git --git-since=3-years-ago Seems like it's worth getting the MAINTAINERS regex updated? Is this right? diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index a34ec41fbf7a..2560dded0e3e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -19261,6 +19261,7 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/ F: Documentation/sound/soc/ F: include/dt-bindings/sound/ F: include/sound/soc* +F: include/sound/sof/ F: sound/soc/ SOUND - SOUND OPEN FIRMWARE (SOF) DRIVERS @@ -19275,6 +19276,7 @@ L: sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org (moderated for non-subscribers) S: Supported W: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/ F: sound/soc/sof/ +F: include/sound/sof/ SOUNDWIRE SUBSYSTEM M: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 08:16:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Seems like it's worth getting the MAINTAINERS regex updated? Is this > right? Yes, looks about right.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:40:55 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting > C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays > declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() > helper macro. > > This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: SOF: control.h: Replace zero-length array with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper commit: b264ef796959cb65cdbc811da5ab950e33df4162 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/include/sound/sof/control.h b/include/sound/sof/control.h index 7379a33d7247..983d374fe511 100644 --- a/include/sound/sof/control.h +++ b/include/sound/sof/control.h @@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data { /* control data - add new types if needed */ union { /* channel values can be used by volume type controls */ - struct sof_ipc_ctrl_value_chan chanv[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_value_chan, chanv); /* component values used by routing controls like mux, mixer */ - struct sof_ipc_ctrl_value_comp compv[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_value_comp, compv); /* data can be used by binary controls */ - struct sof_abi_hdr data[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct sof_abi_hdr, data); }; } __packed;
Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper macro. This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193 Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/211 Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- include/sound/sof/control.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)