Message ID | 20220927152704.12018-2-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Change mmsys compatible for mt8195 mediatek-drm | expand |
On 27/09/2022 17:26, Jason-JH.Lin wrote: > For previous MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8173, there are 2 display HW > pipelines binding to 1 mmsys with the same power domain, the same > clock driver and the same mediatek-drm driver. > > For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding to > 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different > mediatek-drm drivers. > > Moreover, Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS0 has these components: COLOR, > CCORR, AAL, GAMMA, DITHER. They are related to the PQ (Picture Quality) > and they makes VDOSYS0 supports PQ function while they are not > including in VDOSYS1. > > Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS1 has the component ETHDR (HDR related > component). It makes VDOSYS1 supports the HDR function while it's not > including in VDOSYS0. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
Il 27/09/22 17:26, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > For previous MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8173, there are 2 display HW > pipelines binding to 1 mmsys with the same power domain, the same > clock driver and the same mediatek-drm driver. > > For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding to > 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different > mediatek-drm drivers. > > Moreover, Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS0 has these components: COLOR, > CCORR, AAL, GAMMA, DITHER. They are related to the PQ (Picture Quality) > and they makes VDOSYS0 supports PQ function while they are not > including in VDOSYS1. > > Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS1 has the component ETHDR (HDR related > component). It makes VDOSYS1 supports the HDR function while it's not > including in VDOSYS0. > > To summarize0: > Only VDOSYS0 can support PQ adjustment. > Only VDOSYS1 can support HDR adjustment. > > Therefore, we need to separate these two different mmsys hardwares to > 2 different compatibles for MT8195. > > Fixes: 81c5a41d10b9 ("dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding") > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml index 6ad023eec193..9e1876b5f45d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml @@ -31,14 +31,26 @@ properties: - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys - mediatek,mt8186-mmsys - mediatek,mt8192-mmsys - - mediatek,mt8195-mmsys - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys - const: syscon + + - description: vdosys0 and vdosys1 are 2 display HW pipelines, + so mt8195 binding should be deprecated. + deprecated: true + items: + - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys + - const: syscon + - items: - const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys - const: mediatek,mt2701-mmsys - const: syscon + - items: + - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0 + - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys + - const: syscon + reg: maxItems: 1