Message ID | cover.1662459668.git.baskov@ispras.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | x86_64: Improvements at compressed kernel stage | expand |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:41:04PM +0300, Evgeniy Baskov wrote: > This patchset is aimed > * to improve UEFI compatibility of compressed kernel code for x86_64 > * to setup proper memory access attributes for code and rodata sections > * to implement W^X protection policy throughout the whole execution > of compressed kernel for EFISTUB code path. Hi Evgeniy, I've tested this set of patches with the Mu firmware that supports the W^X feature and a modified bootloader to also support it, and also with an existing firmware and the grub2 build in fedora 36. On the firmware without W^X support, this all works for me. With W^X support, it works so long as I use CONFIG_EFI_STUB_EXTRACT_DIRECT, though I still need some changes in grub's loader. IMO that's a big step forward. I can't currently make it work with W^X enabled but without direct extraction, and I'm still investigating why not, but I figured I'd give you a heads up.
On 2022-10-19 00:04, Peter Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:41:04PM +0300, Evgeniy Baskov wrote: >> This patchset is aimed >> * to improve UEFI compatibility of compressed kernel code for x86_64 >> * to setup proper memory access attributes for code and rodata >> sections >> * to implement W^X protection policy throughout the whole execution >> of compressed kernel for EFISTUB code path. > > Hi Evgeniy, > > I've tested this set of patches with the Mu firmware that supports the > W^X > feature and a modified bootloader to also support it, and also with an > existing firmware and the grub2 build in fedora 36. On the firmware > without W^X support, this all works for me. With W^X support, it works > so long as I use CONFIG_EFI_STUB_EXTRACT_DIRECT, though I still need > some changes in grub's loader. IMO that's a big step forward. > > I can't currently make it work with W^X enabled but without direct > extraction, and I'm still investigating why not, but I figured I'd give > you a heads up. Hi Peter, Thank you for testing! Without direct extraction enabled this patch set does not implement total W^X and needs to allocate RWX memory regions, since it should go through common code path that relocates kernel. So if the firmware does not allow allocating RWX regions, it might prevent the kernel from booting, I think. I will look into that problem soon and let you know it I find anything. Thanks, Evgeniy Baskov