Message ID | 20221021203413.1220137-9-jithu.joseph@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | IFS multi test image support and misc changes | expand |
How about? x86/microcode/intel: Add metadata support > +struct metadata_header { > + unsigned int meta_type; > + unsigned int meta_blk_size; > +}; > + > +struct metadata_intel { > + struct metadata_header meta_hdr; > + unsigned int meta_bits[]; > +}; > + Can we avoid the meta_ prefixes in the struct variables since the struct name already includes meta? > #define DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE (2000) > #define MC_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct microcode_header_intel)) > #define DEFAULT_UCODE_TOTALSIZE (DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE + MC_HEADER_SIZE) > @@ -76,6 +89,7 @@ extern int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void); > void reload_ucode_intel(void); > int microcode_intel_find_matching_signature(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf); > int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver); > +struct metadata_header *microcode_intel_find_meta_data(void *ucode, unsigned int meta_type); Is there a difference between "ucode" and "mc"? They seem to be used interchangeably all over. At least to keep it consistent across the exported functions, should the parameter be named "mc"? > int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) > { > - unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size; > + unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size, total_meta; > struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc; > struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL; > u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i; > struct extended_signature *ext_sig; > + struct metadata_header *meta_header; > + unsigned long meta_size = 0; > > total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); > data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); > + total_meta = mc_header->metasize; > > if (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE > total_size) { > if (print_err) > @@ -245,7 +248,7 @@ int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) > } > > if (!ext_table_size) > - return 0; > + goto check_meta; > The code flow in this function seems a bit confusing. Can we avoid the goto and make this a bit cleaner? There is already a check for ext_table_size above. Can the extended signature checking be merged with that? > /* > * Check extended signature checksum: 0 => valid. > @@ -262,6 +265,22 @@ int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) > return -EINVAL; > } > } > + > +check_meta: > + if (!total_meta) > + return 0; > + > + meta_header = (mc + MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) - total_meta; > + while (meta_header->meta_type != META_TYPE_END) { > + meta_size += meta_header->meta_blk_size; > + if (!meta_header->meta_blk_size || meta_size > total_meta) { > + if (print_err) { > + pr_err("Bad value for metadata size, aborting.\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } This seems to be returning an error only when print_err is enabled. Otherwise, it treats as a success. > + } > + meta_header = (void *)meta_header + meta_header->meta_blk_size; > + } > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_intel_sanity_check); > @@ -967,3 +986,28 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void) > > return µcode_intel_ops; > } > + Sohil
On 11/1/2022 1:51 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote: > How about? > > x86/microcode/intel: Add metadata support Will reword as you suggest above > >> +struct metadata_header { >> + unsigned int meta_type; >> + unsigned int meta_blk_size; >> +}; >> + >> +struct metadata_intel { >> + struct metadata_header meta_hdr; >> + unsigned int meta_bits[]; >> +}; >> + > > Can we avoid the meta_ prefixes in the struct variables since the struct name already includes meta? Will do > >> #define DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE (2000) >> #define MC_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct microcode_header_intel)) >> #define DEFAULT_UCODE_TOTALSIZE (DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE + MC_HEADER_SIZE) >> @@ -76,6 +89,7 @@ extern int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void); >> void reload_ucode_intel(void); >> int microcode_intel_find_matching_signature(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf); >> int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver); >> +struct metadata_header *microcode_intel_find_meta_data(void *ucode, unsigned int meta_type); > > Is there a difference between "ucode" and "mc"? They seem to be used interchangeably all over. > > At least to keep it consistent across the exported functions, should the parameter be named "mc"? Will change the parameter to mc > >> int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) >> { >> - unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size; >> + unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size, total_meta; >> struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc; >> struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL; >> u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i; >> struct extended_signature *ext_sig; >> + struct metadata_header *meta_header; >> + unsigned long meta_size = 0; >> total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); >> data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); >> + total_meta = mc_header->metasize; >> if (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE > total_size) { >> if (print_err) >> @@ -245,7 +248,7 @@ int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) >> } >> if (!ext_table_size) >> - return 0; >> + goto check_meta; >> > > The code flow in this function seems a bit confusing. Can we avoid the goto and make this a bit cleaner? > > There is already a check for ext_table_size above. Can the extended signature checking be merged with that? Will modify the flow as below - if (!ext_table_size) - goto check_meta; - + if (ext_table_size) { /* * Check extended signature checksum: 0 => valid. */ for( ...) { return -EINVAL; } } + } >> + >> +check_meta: >> + if (!total_meta) >> + return 0; >> + >> + meta_header = (mc + MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) - total_meta; >> + while (meta_header->meta_type != META_TYPE_END) { >> + meta_size += meta_header->meta_blk_size; >> + if (!meta_header->meta_blk_size || meta_size > total_meta) { >> + if (print_err) { >> + pr_err("Bad value for metadata size, aborting.\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > This seems to be returning an error only when print_err is enabled. Otherwise, it treats as a success. > Thanks for pointing this, will remove the {} following the "if (print_err)" Jithu
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:34:07PM -0700, Jithu Joseph wrote: > From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> > > Intel has made extensions to the microcode file format so that it > can also be used for In Field Scan. And this basically confirms what I just said in my previous mail: you want to do IFS-specific changes already. So please copy all code into your driver and reuse as you like so that there are no cross-breakages.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h index 27eba991c6b6..dcbc377f67d1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ struct microcode_header_intel { unsigned int pf; unsigned int datasize; unsigned int totalsize; - unsigned int reserved[3]; + unsigned int metasize; + unsigned int reserved[2]; }; struct microcode_intel { @@ -36,6 +37,18 @@ struct extended_sigtable { struct extended_signature sigs[]; }; +#define META_TYPE_END (0) + +struct metadata_header { + unsigned int meta_type; + unsigned int meta_blk_size; +}; + +struct metadata_intel { + struct metadata_header meta_hdr; + unsigned int meta_bits[]; +}; + #define DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE (2000) #define MC_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct microcode_header_intel)) #define DEFAULT_UCODE_TOTALSIZE (DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE + MC_HEADER_SIZE) @@ -76,6 +89,7 @@ extern int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void); void reload_ucode_intel(void); int microcode_intel_find_matching_signature(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf); int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver); +struct metadata_header *microcode_intel_find_meta_data(void *ucode, unsigned int meta_type); #else static inline __init void load_ucode_intel_bsp(void) {} static inline void load_ucode_intel_ap(void) {} @@ -86,6 +100,9 @@ static inline int microcode_intel_find_matching_signature(void *mc, unsigned int { return 0; } static inline int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) { return -EINVAL; } +static inline struct metadata_header *microcode_intel_find_meta_data(void *ucode, + unsigned int meta_type) + { return NULL; } #endif #endif /* _ASM_X86_MICROCODE_INTEL_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index bc3f33a25d7a..179ca345bc06 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -168,14 +168,17 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigne int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) { - unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size; + unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size, total_meta; struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc; struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL; u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i; struct extended_signature *ext_sig; + struct metadata_header *meta_header; + unsigned long meta_size = 0; total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); + total_meta = mc_header->metasize; if (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE > total_size) { if (print_err) @@ -245,7 +248,7 @@ int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) } if (!ext_table_size) - return 0; + goto check_meta; /* * Check extended signature checksum: 0 => valid. @@ -262,6 +265,22 @@ int microcode_intel_sanity_check(void *mc, bool print_err, int hdr_ver) return -EINVAL; } } + +check_meta: + if (!total_meta) + return 0; + + meta_header = (mc + MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) - total_meta; + while (meta_header->meta_type != META_TYPE_END) { + meta_size += meta_header->meta_blk_size; + if (!meta_header->meta_blk_size || meta_size > total_meta) { + if (print_err) { + pr_err("Bad value for metadata size, aborting.\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + meta_header = (void *)meta_header + meta_header->meta_blk_size; + } return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_intel_sanity_check); @@ -967,3 +986,28 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void) return µcode_intel_ops; } + +struct metadata_header *microcode_intel_find_meta_data(void *ucode, unsigned int meta_type) +{ + struct metadata_header *meta_header; + unsigned long data_size, total_meta; + unsigned long meta_size = 0; + + data_size = get_datasize(ucode); + total_meta = ((struct microcode_intel *)ucode)->hdr.metasize; + + if (!total_meta) + return NULL; + + meta_header = (ucode + MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) - total_meta; + + while ((meta_header->meta_type != META_TYPE_END) && meta_size < total_meta) { + meta_size += meta_header->meta_blk_size; + if (meta_header->meta_type == meta_type) + return meta_header; + + meta_header = (void *)meta_header + meta_header->meta_blk_size; + } + return NULL; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_intel_find_meta_data);