Message ID | 20221114054655.68090-3-aakarsh.jain@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4,1/3] media: dt-bindings: s5p-mfc: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC | expand |
On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote: > commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. > Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by > Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of > IP clock. > Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string Just "Add variant" Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org] > Sent: 14 November 2022 13:22 > To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Cc: m.szyprowski@samsung.com; andrzej.hajda@intel.com; > mchehab@kernel.org; hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl; > ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@gmail.com; > benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; > stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org; dillon.minfei@gmail.com; > david.plowman@raspberrypi.com; mark.rutland@arm.com; > robh+dt@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; andi@etezian.org; > alim.akhtar@samsung.com; aswani.reddy@samsung.com; > pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; smitha.t@samsung.com > Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 > hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC > > On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote: > > commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for > > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. > Do you mean warnings on "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" commit? Or on this patch? I am running like this : ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch_file, it does not show any warnings. or am I missing anything while running checkpatch on the current patch? > > Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by > > Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP clock. > > Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string > > Just "Add variant" > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 14/11/2022 10:44, Aakarsh Jain wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org] >> Sent: 14 November 2022 13:22 >> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>; linux-arm- >> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: m.szyprowski@samsung.com; andrzej.hajda@intel.com; >> mchehab@kernel.org; hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl; >> ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@gmail.com; >> benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; >> stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org; dillon.minfei@gmail.com; >> david.plowman@raspberrypi.com; mark.rutland@arm.com; >> robh+dt@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; andi@etezian.org; >> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; aswani.reddy@samsung.com; >> pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; smitha.t@samsung.com >> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 >> hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC >> >> On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote: >>> commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for >> >> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. >> > Do you mean warnings on "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" commit? Or on this patch? > > I am running like this : ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch_file, it does not show any warnings. > > or am I missing anything while running checkpatch on the current patch? Eh, you're right... checkpatch does not catch it. You need to fix syntax - drop quotes, use proper commit title: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L100 Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c index fca5c6405eec..007c7dbee037 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c @@ -1576,8 +1576,18 @@ static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7 = { .port_num = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7, .buf_size = &buf_size_v7, .fw_name[0] = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw", - .clk_names = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"}, - .num_clocks = 2, + .clk_names = {"mfc"}, + .num_clocks = 1, +}; + +static struct s5p_mfc_variant mfc_drvdata_v7_3250 = { + .version = MFC_VERSION_V7, + .version_bit = MFC_V7_BIT, + .port_num = MFC_NUM_PORTS_V7, + .buf_size = &buf_size_v7, + .fw_name[0] = "s5p-mfc-v7.fw", + .clk_names = {"mfc", "sclk_mfc"}, + .num_clocks = 2, }; static struct s5p_mfc_buf_size_v6 mfc_buf_size_v8 = { @@ -1647,6 +1657,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_mfc_match[] = { }, { .compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7", .data = &mfc_drvdata_v7, + }, { + .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc", + .data = &mfc_drvdata_v7_3250, }, { .compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8", .data = &mfc_drvdata_v8,
commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP clock. Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for Exynos3250 SoC. Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> Fixes: 5441e9dafdfc ("[media] s5p-mfc: Core support for MFC v7") Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com> --- .../media/platform/samsung/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)