diff mbox series

vfio/platform: Remove the ACPI buffer memory to fix memory leak

Message ID 1669116598-25761-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series vfio/platform: Remove the ACPI buffer memory to fix memory leak | expand

Commit Message

Hanjun Guo Nov. 22, 2022, 11:29 a.m. UTC
The ACPI buffer memory (buffer.pointer) returned by acpi_evaluate_object()
is not used after the call of _RST method, so it leads to memory leak.

For the calling of ACPI _RST method, we don't need to pass a buffer
for acpi_evaluate_object(), we can just pass NULL and remove the ACPI
buffer memory in vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(), then we don't need to
free the memory and no memory leak.

Fixes: d30daa33ec1d ("vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI")
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Auger Nov. 23, 2022, 8:41 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 11/22/22 12:29, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> The ACPI buffer memory (buffer.pointer) returned by acpi_evaluate_object()
> is not used after the call of _RST method, so it leads to memory leak.
>
> For the calling of ACPI _RST method, we don't need to pass a buffer
> for acpi_evaluate_object(), we can just pass NULL and remove the ACPI
> buffer memory in vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(), then we don't need to
> free the memory and no memory leak.
>
> Fixes: d30daa33ec1d ("vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI")
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index 55dc4f4..1a0a238 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,11 @@ static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  				  const char **extra_dbg)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>  	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>  	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>  	acpi_status acpi_ret;
>  
> -	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, &buffer);
> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
>  		if (extra_dbg)
>  			*extra_dbg = acpi_format_exception(acpi_ret);
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Thank you for the fix!

Eric
Alex Williamson Nov. 29, 2022, 7:52 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:29:58 +0800
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> wrote:

> The ACPI buffer memory (buffer.pointer) returned by acpi_evaluate_object()
> is not used after the call of _RST method, so it leads to memory leak.
> 
> For the calling of ACPI _RST method, we don't need to pass a buffer
> for acpi_evaluate_object(), we can just pass NULL and remove the ACPI
> buffer memory in vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(), then we don't need to
> free the memory and no memory leak.
> 
> Fixes: d30daa33ec1d ("vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI")
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index 55dc4f4..1a0a238 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,11 @@ static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  				  const char **extra_dbg)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>  	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>  	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>  	acpi_status acpi_ret;
>  
> -	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, &buffer);
> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
>  		if (extra_dbg)
>  			*extra_dbg = acpi_format_exception(acpi_ret);

An identical change was already posted and accepted into the vfio next
branch, see:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221018152825.891032-1-rafaelmendsr@gmail.com/

In linux-next as:

e67e070632a6 ("vfio: platform: Do not pass return buffer to ACPI _RST method")

Thanks,
Alex
Hanjun Guo Nov. 30, 2022, 1:20 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2022/11/30 3:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:29:58 +0800
> Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> The ACPI buffer memory (buffer.pointer) returned by acpi_evaluate_object()
>> is not used after the call of _RST method, so it leads to memory leak.
>>
>> For the calling of ACPI _RST method, we don't need to pass a buffer
>> for acpi_evaluate_object(), we can just pass NULL and remove the ACPI
>> buffer memory in vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(), then we don't need to
>> free the memory and no memory leak.
>>
>> Fixes: d30daa33ec1d ("vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI")
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> index 55dc4f4..1a0a238 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> @@ -72,12 +72,11 @@ static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>   				  const char **extra_dbg)
>>   {
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>>   	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>>   	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>>   	acpi_status acpi_ret;
>>   
>> -	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, &buffer);
>> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
>>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
>>   		if (extra_dbg)
>>   			*extra_dbg = acpi_format_exception(acpi_ret);
> 
> An identical change was already posted and accepted into the vfio next
> branch, see:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221018152825.891032-1-rafaelmendsr@gmail.com/
> 
> In linux-next as:
> 
> e67e070632a6 ("vfio: platform: Do not pass return buffer to ACPI _RST method")

Thanks, I missed this patch, please drop this one.

Thanks
Hanjun
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
index 55dc4f4..1a0a238 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
@@ -72,12 +72,11 @@  static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 				  const char **extra_dbg)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
 	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
 	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
 	acpi_status acpi_ret;
 
-	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, &buffer);
+	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
 		if (extra_dbg)
 			*extra_dbg = acpi_format_exception(acpi_ret);