| Message ID | 20221213102707.1096345-1-olivier.moysan@foss.st.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pwm: stm32: enforce settings for pwm capture | expand |
Hello Olivier, [Cc: += William Breathitt Gray, linux-iio@v.k.o] On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Olivier Moysan wrote: > The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default > input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for > TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. When does the problem occur? Only if the bootloader changed that setting? Regarding the urgency: With the current knowledge I'd say this patch is material for the next merge window. Do you recommend backporting to stable? > Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself > for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. > However, the current implementation of the driver does not > allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM > capture results in wrong capture values. What is your usecase for PWM capture support? I didn't double check, but I think you're the first contributor to PWM capture since 2018 (i.e. the commit you're fixing). Did you check if the counter subsystem would solve your problems? If it doesn't I assume William would like to hear about that. Looking at drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c it does seem to work in slave mode, TISEL isn't touched though. So maybe this driver needs a similar fix? Apart from that the change looks reasonable: Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Best regards Uwe
Hello Uwe, On 12/13/22 11:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Olivier, > > [Cc: += William Breathitt Gray, linux-iio@v.k.o] > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Olivier Moysan wrote: >> The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default >> input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for >> TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. > > When does the problem occur? Only if the bootloader changed that > setting? Regarding the urgency: With the current knowledge I'd say this > patch is material for the next merge window. Do you recommend > backporting to stable? > Yes, the PWM may not be in the default expected state, if the configuration has been changed in the bootloader. This is not an actual case today, so this patch can wait the next merge window and there is no urgency to have it in stable. BRs Olivier >> Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself >> for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. >> However, the current implementation of the driver does not >> allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM >> capture results in wrong capture values. > > What is your usecase for PWM capture support? I didn't double check, but > I think you're the first contributor to PWM capture since 2018 (i.e. the > commit you're fixing). > > Did you check if the counter subsystem would solve your problems? If it > doesn't I assume William would like to hear about that. > > Looking at drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c it does seem to work in > slave mode, TISEL isn't touched though. So maybe this driver needs a > similar fix? > > Apart from that the change looks reasonable: > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > Best regards > Uwe >
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Olivier Moysan wrote: > The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default > input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for > TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. > > Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself > for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. > However, the current implementation of the driver does not > allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM > capture results in wrong capture values. > > Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support") > Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 ++++ > include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 1 + Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > index 794ca5b02968..24aab0450c78 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > @@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ static int stm32_pwm_capture(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_ARR, priv->max_arr); > regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_PSC, psc); > > + /* Reset input selector to its default input and disable slave mode */ > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_TISEL, 0x0); > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_SMCR, 0x0); > + > /* Map TI1 or TI2 PWM input to IC1 & IC2 (or TI3/4 to IC3 & IC4) */ > regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, > pwm->hwpwm < 2 ? TIM_CCMR1 : TIM_CCMR2, > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h b/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h > index 5f5c43fd69dd..1b94325febb3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > #define TIM_BDTR 0x44 /* Break and Dead-Time Reg */ > #define TIM_DCR 0x48 /* DMA control register */ > #define TIM_DMAR 0x4C /* DMA register for transfer */ > +#define TIM_TISEL 0x68 /* Input Selection */ > > #define TIM_CR1_CEN BIT(0) /* Counter Enable */ > #define TIM_CR1_DIR BIT(4) /* Counter Direction */ > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hello, On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Olivier MOYSAN wrote: > Hello Uwe, > > On 12/13/22 11:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Olivier, > > > > [Cc: += William Breathitt Gray, linux-iio@v.k.o] > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Olivier Moysan wrote: > > > The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default > > > input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for > > > TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. > > > > When does the problem occur? Only if the bootloader changed that > > setting? Regarding the urgency: With the current knowledge I'd say this > > patch is material for the next merge window. Do you recommend > > backporting to stable? > > > > Yes, the PWM may not be in the default expected state, if the configuration > has been changed in the bootloader. This is not an actual case today, so > this patch can wait the next merge window and there is no > urgency to have it in stable. Then I'd drop the fixes line. > > > Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself > > > for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. > > > However, the current implementation of the driver does not > > > allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM > > > capture results in wrong capture values. > > > > What is your usecase for PWM capture support? I didn't double check, but > > I think you're the first contributor to PWM capture since 2018 (i.e. the > > commit you're fixing). > > > > Did you check if the counter subsystem would solve your problems? If it > > doesn't I assume William would like to hear about that. > > > > Looking at drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c it does seem to work in > > slave mode, TISEL isn't touched though. So maybe this driver needs a > > similar fix? I want to come back to this question. I only checked lightly, but I guess the counter patch needs the same patch. Best regards Uwe
Hello, [Cc -= Benjamin Gaignard, their email address bounced] On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:43:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Olivier MOYSAN wrote: > > On 12/13/22 11:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > Looking at drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c it does seem to work in > > > slave mode, TISEL isn't touched though. So maybe this driver needs a > > > similar fix? > > I want to come back to this question. I only checked lightly, but I > guess the counter patch needs the same patch. I cared for that one, now. See https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20230412153709.3557323-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Best regards Uwe
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c index 794ca5b02968..24aab0450c78 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c @@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ static int stm32_pwm_capture(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_ARR, priv->max_arr); regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_PSC, psc); + /* Reset input selector to its default input and disable slave mode */ + regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_TISEL, 0x0); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_SMCR, 0x0); + /* Map TI1 or TI2 PWM input to IC1 & IC2 (or TI3/4 to IC3 & IC4) */ regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, pwm->hwpwm < 2 ? TIM_CCMR1 : TIM_CCMR2, diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h b/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h index 5f5c43fd69dd..1b94325febb3 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #define TIM_BDTR 0x44 /* Break and Dead-Time Reg */ #define TIM_DCR 0x48 /* DMA control register */ #define TIM_DMAR 0x4C /* DMA register for transfer */ +#define TIM_TISEL 0x68 /* Input Selection */ #define TIM_CR1_CEN BIT(0) /* Counter Enable */ #define TIM_CR1_DIR BIT(4) /* Counter Direction */
The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. However, the current implementation of the driver does not allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM capture results in wrong capture values. Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support") Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)