Message ID | 20221215163743.452648-1-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/amd/display: fix dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap return code | expand |
On 12/15/22 17:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > The dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap() return type changed from 'bool' > to 'enum dc_status', so now the early 'return' uses the wrong > type: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c: In function 'dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap': > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c:5075:24: error: implicit conversion from 'enum <anonymous>' to 'enum dc_status' [-Werror=enum-conversion] > 5075 | return false; > | ^~~~~ > > Convert it to return 'DC_OK', which is the same value as 'false'. > > Fixes: b473bd5fc333 ("drm/amd/display: refine wake up aux in retrieve link caps") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > No idea if DC_OK is the intended return code, but it leaves the behavior > unchanged and fixes the warning. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > index af9411ee3c74..95dbfa4e996a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c > @@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ enum dc_status dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap(struct dc_link *link) > bool vbios_lttpr_interop = link->dc->caps.vbios_lttpr_aware; > > if (!vbios_lttpr_interop || !link->dc->caps.extended_aux_timeout_support) > - return false; > + return DC_OK; return status; seems more appropriate. (Otherwise the status = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED initialization has no effect)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022, at 18:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 12/15/22 17:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote: /amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c >> index af9411ee3c74..95dbfa4e996a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c >> @@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ enum dc_status dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap(struct dc_link *link) >> bool vbios_lttpr_interop = link->dc->caps.vbios_lttpr_aware; >> >> if (!vbios_lttpr_interop || !link->dc->caps.extended_aux_timeout_support) >> - return false; >> + return DC_OK; > > return status; > > seems more appropriate. (Otherwise the status = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED > initialization has no effect) Ok, makes sense. I'd also remove the unused initialization in that case though: enum dc_status dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap(struct dc_link *link) { uint8_t lttpr_dpcd_data[8]; - enum dc_status status = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED; - bool is_lttpr_present = false; + enum dc_status status; + bool is_lttpr_present; /* Logic to determine LTTPR support*/ bool vbios_lttpr_interop = link->dc->caps.vbios_lttpr_aware; if (!vbios_lttpr_interop || !link->dc->caps.extended_aux_timeout_support) - return false; + return DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED; /* By reading LTTPR capability, RX assumes that we will enable * LTTPR extended aux timeout if LTTPR is present. I'll send that as a v2 once that passes my build test and nobody has further suggestions. Arnd
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c index af9411ee3c74..95dbfa4e996a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c @@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ enum dc_status dp_retrieve_lttpr_cap(struct dc_link *link) bool vbios_lttpr_interop = link->dc->caps.vbios_lttpr_aware; if (!vbios_lttpr_interop || !link->dc->caps.extended_aux_timeout_support) - return false; + return DC_OK; /* By reading LTTPR capability, RX assumes that we will enable * LTTPR extended aux timeout if LTTPR is present.