| Message ID | 20230105223225.never.252-kees@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | ccdbefcf661e537a3126719f4f11484cd85404d7 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RDMA/cxgb4: Replace 0-length arrays with flexible arrays | expand |
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:32:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace all remaining > 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, using > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: > > In function 'build_rdma_write', > inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:597:38: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fw_ri_immd[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] > 597 | wqe->write.u.immd_src[0].r2 = 0; > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h: In function 'c4iw_post_send': > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:567:35: note: while referencing 'immd_src' > 567 | struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > | ^~~~~~~~ > > Additionally drop the unused C99_NOT_SUPPORTED ifndef lines. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Thanks! -- Gustavo > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h | 26 ++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h > index a2f5e29ef226..1f79537fc8d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h > @@ -122,9 +122,7 @@ struct fw_ri_dsgl { > __be16 nsge; > __be32 len0; > __be64 addr0; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > struct fw_ri_dsge_pair sge[]; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_sge { > @@ -138,9 +136,7 @@ struct fw_ri_isgl { > __u8 r1; > __be16 nsge; > __be32 r2; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > struct fw_ri_sge sge[]; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_immd { > @@ -148,9 +144,7 @@ struct fw_ri_immd { > __u8 r1; > __be16 r2; > __be32 immdlen; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > __u8 data[]; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_tpte { > @@ -320,9 +314,7 @@ struct fw_ri_res_wr { > __be32 op_nres; > __be32 len16_pkd; > __u64 cookie; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > struct fw_ri_res res[]; > -#endif > }; > > #define FW_RI_RES_WR_NRES_S 0 > @@ -562,12 +554,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_wr { > __be32 plen; > __be32 stag_sink; > __be64 to_sink; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > union { > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); > } u; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_send_wr { > @@ -581,12 +571,10 @@ struct fw_ri_send_wr { > __be32 plen; > __be32 r3; > __be64 r4; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > union { > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); > } u; > -#endif > }; > > #define FW_RI_SEND_WR_SENDOP_S 0 > @@ -618,12 +606,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_cmpl_wr { > struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src; > } u_cmpl; > __be64 r3; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > union fw_ri_write { > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); > } u; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_rdma_read_wr { > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:32:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace all remaining > 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, using > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: > > In function 'build_rdma_write', > inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:597:38: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fw_ri_immd[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] > 597 | wqe->write.u.immd_src[0].r2 = 0; > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h: In function 'c4iw_post_send': > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:567:35: note: while referencing 'immd_src' > 567 | struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > | ^~~~~~~~ > > Additionally drop the unused C99_NOT_SUPPORTED ifndef lines. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h | 26 ++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) <...> > #define FW_RI_SEND_WR_SENDOP_S 0 > @@ -618,12 +606,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_cmpl_wr { > struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src; > } u_cmpl; > __be64 r3; > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > union fw_ri_write { > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); smatch built from commit 40351132df3b ("strlen: add __builtin and __fortify functions") produces the following warning: drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:575:17: warning: array of flexible structures Is it expected? What will prevent from getting this warning from 0-day build bots? Thanks > } u; > -#endif > }; > > struct fw_ri_rdma_read_wr { > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 02:08:52PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:32:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace all remaining > > 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, using > > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: > > > > In function 'build_rdma_write', > > inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:597:38: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fw_ri_immd[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] > > 597 | wqe->write.u.immd_src[0].r2 = 0; > > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h: In function 'c4iw_post_send': > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:567:35: note: while referencing 'immd_src' > > 567 | struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > > | ^~~~~~~~ > > > > Additionally drop the unused C99_NOT_SUPPORTED ifndef lines. > > > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > > > Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> > > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > > --- > > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h | 26 ++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > <...> > > > #define FW_RI_SEND_WR_SENDOP_S 0 > > @@ -618,12 +606,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_cmpl_wr { > > struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src; > > } u_cmpl; > > __be64 r3; > > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > > union fw_ri_write { > > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); > > smatch built from commit 40351132df3b ("strlen: add __builtin and > __fortify functions") produces the following warning: > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:575:17: warning: array of flexible structures > > Is it expected? What will prevent from getting this warning from 0-day > build bots? Err, I'm not sure I understand? Does smatch define "C99_NOT_SUPPORTED"?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 05:03:48PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 02:08:52PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:32:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace all remaining > > > 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, using > > > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: > > > > > > In function 'build_rdma_write', > > > inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: > > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:597:38: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fw_ri_immd[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] > > > 597 | wqe->write.u.immd_src[0].r2 = 0; > > > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ > > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h: In function 'c4iw_post_send': > > > ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:567:35: note: while referencing 'immd_src' > > > 567 | struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > > > | ^~~~~~~~ > > > > > > Additionally drop the unused C99_NOT_SUPPORTED ifndef lines. > > > > > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays > > > > > > Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com> > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > > > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> > > > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h | 26 ++++++----------------- > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > <...> > > > > > #define FW_RI_SEND_WR_SENDOP_S 0 > > > @@ -618,12 +606,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_cmpl_wr { > > > struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src; > > > } u_cmpl; > > > __be64 r3; > > > -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED > > > union fw_ri_write { > > > - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; > > > - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; > > > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); > > > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); > > > > smatch built from commit 40351132df3b ("strlen: add __builtin and > > __fortify functions") produces the following warning: > > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:575:17: warning: array of flexible structures > > > > Is it expected? What will prevent from getting this warning from 0-day > > build bots? > > Err, I'm not sure I understand? Does smatch define "C99_NOT_SUPPORTED"? Why should it define? You removed C99_NOT_SUPPORTED. Just download smatch, build from scratch and run over this patch. It generates new warning. ➜ kernel git:(wip/leon-for-next) mkt ci --no-sparse --no-extra-warnings ccdbefcf661e (HEAD -> build) RDMA/cxgb4: Replace 0-length arrays with flexible arrays WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #11: inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:558:17: warning: array of flexible structures .... > > -- > Kees Cook
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h index a2f5e29ef226..1f79537fc8d1 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h @@ -122,9 +122,7 @@ struct fw_ri_dsgl { __be16 nsge; __be32 len0; __be64 addr0; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED struct fw_ri_dsge_pair sge[]; -#endif }; struct fw_ri_sge { @@ -138,9 +136,7 @@ struct fw_ri_isgl { __u8 r1; __be16 nsge; __be32 r2; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED struct fw_ri_sge sge[]; -#endif }; struct fw_ri_immd { @@ -148,9 +144,7 @@ struct fw_ri_immd { __u8 r1; __be16 r2; __be32 immdlen; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED __u8 data[]; -#endif }; struct fw_ri_tpte { @@ -320,9 +314,7 @@ struct fw_ri_res_wr { __be32 op_nres; __be32 len16_pkd; __u64 cookie; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED struct fw_ri_res res[]; -#endif }; #define FW_RI_RES_WR_NRES_S 0 @@ -562,12 +554,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_wr { __be32 plen; __be32 stag_sink; __be64 to_sink; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED union { - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); } u; -#endif }; struct fw_ri_send_wr { @@ -581,12 +571,10 @@ struct fw_ri_send_wr { __be32 plen; __be32 r3; __be64 r4; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED union { - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); } u; -#endif }; #define FW_RI_SEND_WR_SENDOP_S 0 @@ -618,12 +606,10 @@ struct fw_ri_rdma_write_cmpl_wr { struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src; } u_cmpl; __be64 r3; -#ifndef C99_NOT_SUPPORTED union fw_ri_write { - struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; - struct fw_ri_isgl isgl_src[0]; + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_immd, immd_src); + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct fw_ri_isgl, isgl_src); } u; -#endif }; struct fw_ri_rdma_read_wr {
Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace all remaining 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, using -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: In function 'build_rdma_write', inlined from 'c4iw_post_send' at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:1173:10: ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c:597:38: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fw_ri_immd[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 597 | wqe->write.u.immd_src[0].r2 = 0; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h: In function 'c4iw_post_send': ../drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h:567:35: note: while referencing 'immd_src' 567 | struct fw_ri_immd immd_src[0]; | ^~~~~~~~ Additionally drop the unused C99_NOT_SUPPORTED ifndef lines. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Cc: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4fw_ri_api.h | 26 ++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)