| Message ID | 1671096096-20307-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 36f78477ac2c89e9a2eed4a31404a291a3450b5d |
| Headers | show |
| Series | usb: typec: tcpm: Fix altmode re-registration causes sysfs create fail | expand |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:21:36PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Why not send directly from this address so we can validate that this is
the correct email address of yours?
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2022年12月15日 週四 下午5:44寫道： > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:21:36PM +0800, cy_huang wrote: > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com> > > Why not send directly from this address so we can validate that this is > the correct email address of yours? > It's the company mailbox policy. To send the external mail, there's the security text block at the bottom. Except this, some mail address are also blocked. To avoid this, I use my personal mail to send the patch and leave the SoB for the Richtek mailbox. It's lazy to fight for this. Sorry for the inconvinence. > thanks, > > greg k-h
On 12/15/22 17:21, cy_huang wrote: > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com> > > There's the altmode re-registeration issue after data role > swap (DR_SWAP). > > Comparing to USBPD 2.0, in USBPD 3.0, it loose the limit that only DFP > can initiate the VDM command to get partner identity information. > > For a USBPD 3.0 UFP device, it may already get the identity information > from its port partner before DR_SWAP. If DR_SWAP send or receive at the > mean time, 'send_discover' flag will be raised again. It causes discover > identify action restart while entering ready state. And after all > discover actions are done, the 'tcpm_register_altmodes' will be called. > If old altmode is not unregistered, this sysfs create fail can be found. > > In 'DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR' state case, only DFP will unregister altmodes. > For UFP, the original altmodes keep registered. > > This patch fix the logic that after DR_SWAP, 'tcpm_unregister_altmodes' > must be called whatever the current data role is. > > Fixes: ae8a2ca8a221 ("usb: typec: Group all TCPCI/TCPM code together) > Reported-by: TommyYl Chen <tommyyl.chen@mediatek.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com> > --- > Hi, > > Below's the issue log for the reference. > > *TCPM > [ 3.856679] AMS DISCOVER_MODES start > [ 3.856687] PD TX, header: 0x188f > [ 3.858827] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 3.865330] PD RX, header: 0x2daf [1] > [ 3.865340] Rx VDM cmd 0xff01a043 type 1 cmd 3 len 2 > [ 3.865348] AMS DISCOVER_MODES finished > [ 3.865352] Alternate mode 0: SVID 0xff01, VDO 1: 0x001c0045 > [ 3.865362] AMS DISCOVER_MODES start > [ 3.865367] PD TX, header: 0x1a8f > [ 3.867802] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 3.875208] PD RX, header: 0x2faf [1] > [ 3.875216] Rx VDM cmd 0x413ca043 type 1 cmd 3 len 2 > [ 3.875222] AMS DISCOVER_MODES finished > [ 3.875225] Alternate mode 1: SVID 0x413c, VDO 1: 0x00000001 > [ 3.938243] AMS GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES start > [ 3.938255] state change SNK_READY -> AMS_START [rev3 GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES] > [ 3.938266] state change AMS_START -> GET_SINK_CAP [rev3 GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES] > [ 3.938274] PD TX, header: 0xe88 > [ 3.940268] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 3.940310] pending state change GET_SINK_CAP -> GET_SINK_CAP_TIMEOUT @ 60 ms > [rev3 GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES] > [ 3.946291] PD RX, header: 0x13a4 [1] > [ 3.946295] Port partner FRS capable partner_frs_current:0 port_frs_current:0 enable:n > [ 3.946298] state change GET_SINK_CAP -> SNK_READY [rev3 GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES] > [ 3.946304] AMS GET_SINK_CAPABILITIES finished > [ 4.239342] CC1: 5 -> 4, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state SNK_READY, polarity 0, connected] > [ 4.256594] PD RX, header: 0x5a9 [1] > [ 4.256603] state change SNK_READY -> DR_SWAP_ACCEPT [rev3 DATA_ROLE_SWAP] > [ 4.256609] PD TX, header: 0x83 > [ 4.258528] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 4.258584] state change DR_SWAP_ACCEPT -> DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR [rev3 DATA_ROLE_SWAP] > [ 4.258591] Requesting mux state 1, usb-role 1, orientation 1 > [ 4.259588] AMS DATA_ROLE_SWAP finished > [ 4.259592] state change DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR -> SNK_READY [rev3 NONE_AMS] > [ 4.259605] AMS DISCOVER_IDENTITY start > [ 4.259609] Sink TX No Go > [ 4.260874] CC1: 4 -> 5, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state SNK_READY, polarity 0, connected] > [ 4.359636] AMS DISCOVER_IDENTITY start > [ 4.359642] PD TX, header: 0x12af > [ 4.361884] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 4.369433] PD RX, header: 0x578f [1] > [ 4.369439] Rx VDM cmd 0xff00a041 type 1 cmd 1 len 5 > [ 4.369448] AMS DISCOVER_IDENTITY finished > [ 4.369515] Identity: 413c:c013.0712 > [ 4.369521] AMS DISCOVER_SVIDS start > [ 4.369524] PD TX, header: 0x14af > [ 4.371696] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 4.378564] PD RX, header: 0x398f [1] > [ 4.378573] Rx VDM cmd 0xff00a042 type 1 cmd 2 len 3 > [ 4.378579] AMS DISCOVER_SVIDS finished > [ 4.378582] SVID 1: 0xff01 > [ 4.378584] SVID 2: 0x413c > [ 4.378594] AMS DISCOVER_MODES start > [ 4.378597] PD TX, header: 0x16af > [ 4.380696] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 4.387008] PD RX, header: 0x2b8f [1] > [ 4.387014] Rx VDM cmd 0xff01a043 type 1 cmd 3 len 2 > [ 4.387021] AMS DISCOVER_MODES finished > [ 4.387023] Alternate mode 0: SVID 0xff01, VDO 1: 0x001c0045 > [ 4.387029] AMS DISCOVER_MODES start > [ 4.387031] PD TX, header: 0x18af > [ 4.389134] PD TX complete, status: 0 > [ 4.395528] PD RX, header: 0x2d8f [1] > [ 4.395538] Rx VDM cmd 0x413ca043 type 1 cmd 3 len 2 > [ 4.395546] AMS DISCOVER_MODES finished > [ 4.395548] Alternate mode 1: SVID 0x413c, VDO 1: 0x00000001 > > *Kernel TRACE > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename > '/devices/platform/soc/11d01000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0034/mt6360-tcpc.6.auto/typec/port0/port0.0/partner' > CPU: 2 PID: 299 Comm: mt6360-tcpc.6.a Tainted: GO 5.15.37-mtk+g880abc5122e7 #1 > Hardware name: MediaTek MT8195 demo board (DT) > Call trace: > dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1ac > show_stack+0x24/0x30 > dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 > dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 > sysfs_warn_dup+0x70/0x90 > typec_probe+0xa4/0x134 [typec] > really_probe.part.0+0xa4/0x310 > __device_attach_driver+0x100/0x16c > bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0 > __device_attach+0xe0/0x1ac > device_add+0x39c/0x8b0 > device_register+0x2c/0x40 > typec_register_altmode+0x1f4/0x360 [typec] > typec_partner_register_altmode+0x1c/0x30 [typec] > tcpm_pd_rx_handler+0x19d4/0x1c0c [tcpm] > kthread_worker_fn+0xb8/0x290 > kthread+0x15c/0x170 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > [ 4.395962] typec_displayport port0-partner.2: failed to create symlinks > [ 4.395967] typec_displayport: probe of port0-partner.2 failed with error -17 > > It seems it's a common issue if typec port supports the modal operation. > > --- > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > index 904c7b4..59b366b 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > @@ -4594,14 +4594,13 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port) > tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0); > break; > case DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR: > - if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST) { > - tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port); > + tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port); > + if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST) > tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role, > TYPEC_DEVICE); > - } else { > + else > tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role, > TYPEC_HOST); > - } > tcpm_ams_finish(port); > tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0); > break; Reviewed-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com> Thank for your help. Regards, Macpaul Lin
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:44PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2022年12月15日 週四 下午5:44寫道： > > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:21:36PM +0800, cy_huang wrote: > > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com> > > > > Why not send directly from this address so we can validate that this is > > the correct email address of yours? > > > It's the company mailbox policy. To send the external mail, there's > the security text block at the bottom. > Except this, some mail address are also blocked. To avoid this, I use > my personal mail to send the patch > and leave the SoB for the Richtek mailbox. > It's lazy to fight for this. Please fix it, otherwise your company's email address will be spoofed and people can claim to be sending changes from their domain. Please fix that up, abusing random gmail addresses like this is not ok, sorry. greg k-h
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:43:35PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:44PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2022年12月15日 週四 下午5:44寫道： > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:21:36PM +0800, cy_huang wrote: > > > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com> > > > > > > Why not send directly from this address so we can validate that this is > > > the correct email address of yours? > > > > > It's the company mailbox policy. To send the external mail, there's > > the security text block at the bottom. > > Except this, some mail address are also blocked. To avoid this, I use > > my personal mail to send the patch > > and leave the SoB for the Richtek mailbox. > > It's lazy to fight for this. > > Please fix it, otherwise your company's email address will be spoofed > and people can claim to be sending changes from their domain. > > Please fix that up, abusing random gmail addresses like this is not ok, > sorry. Thanks for your comment. After the work with MIS for several weeks, we finnaly got one way to do it. But I'm not sure all mail account can receive the mail. If anyone cannot receive the mail, please inform me. ChiYuan Huang. > > greg k-h ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:41:23AM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** > > The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you! Now deleted. For obvious reasons, this wording is not compatible with kernel development :(
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2023年1月9日 週一 下午2:38寫道： > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:41:23AM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > > ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** > > > > The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you! > > Now deleted. > > For obvious reasons, this wording is not compatible with kernel > development :( I'm sorry about that. Let me check with MIS..............
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:46:34PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2023年1月9日 週一 下午2:38寫道： > > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:41:23AM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > > > ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** > > > > > > The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you! > > > > Now deleted. > > > > For obvious reasons, this wording is not compatible with kernel > > development :( > > I'm sorry about that. Let me check with MIS.............. This one seems work. https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/9/73
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c index 904c7b4..59b366b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c @@ -4594,14 +4594,13 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port) tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0); break; case DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR: - if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST) { - tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port); + tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port); + if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST) tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role, TYPEC_DEVICE); - } else { + else tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role, TYPEC_HOST); - } tcpm_ams_finish(port); tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0); break;