| Message ID | 1663210188-5485-1-git-send-email-zenghongling@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v6,1/3] uas: add no-uas quirk for Hiksemi usb_disk | expand |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:49:48AM +0800, Hongling Zeng wrote: > The UAS mode of Hiksemi USB_HDD is reported to fail to work on several > platforms with the following error message, then after re-connecting the > device will be offlined and not working at all. > > [ 592.518442][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 18 > inflight: CMD > [ 592.527575][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 03 6f 88 00 00 > 04 00 00 > [ 592.536330][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1 > inflight: CMD > [ 592.545266][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 07 44 1a 88 00 > 00 08 00 > > These disks have a broken uas implementation, the tag field of the status > iu-s is not set properly,so we need to fall-back to usb-storage. > > Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> > --- > Change for v1 > - Change the email real name and the code worng place. > > Change for v2 > -Change spelling error. > > Change for v3 > -Add acked-by > > Change for v4 > -Fix version error > > Change for v5 > -change version > > Change for v6 > -Change the git message for patch 3 > --- I already sent you an Acked-by: in v3 of this patch, and the patch hasn't changed significantly since then so you can keep the Acked-by: in this version. Alan Stern > drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > index a6bf87a..8a18d58 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bc2, 0xab2a, 0x0000, 0x9999, > USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > US_FL_NO_ATA_1X), > > +/* Reported-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> */ > +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bda, 0x9210, 0x0000, 0x9999, > + "Hiksemi", > + "External HDD", > + USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > + US_FL_IGNORE_UAS), > + > /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> */ > UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999, > "Initio Corporation", > -- > 2.1.0
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:55:55PM +0800, nana wrote: > Hi: > > ok,I have upated to v7. > > Sorry , The information in the previous answers about thinkplus(0x17ef, > 0x3899) comes from the tester, which is somewhat confused. > > I just get the device from other department and the detailed test data > are as follows: > > > Test the thinkplus(0x17ef, 0x3899) speed by gnome-disk-utility tool. > > linux(load uas)： linux(not load uas): > > read： 394.2 MB/s read: 382.2 MB/s > > > write: 377.4 MB/s write: 347.8 MB/s > > > --------------------- > > win10(lower than linux,but more stable): > > read : 388.1 MB/s > > write: 320 MB/s > > > The main performance differences is write speed.but load uas can cause error > after long run, not good compatible with uas, So two bosses can > consideration for the third patch is it feasible. Is there any way for you to tell which protocol Windows uses (usb-storage or UAS)? Alan Stern
I checked that the device manager was not load the uas driver, And this lower write speed for win10 doesn't seem to use uas protocol for this device. zhongling0719@126.com From: Alan Stern Date: 2022-09-17 01:21 To: nana CC: gregkh; USB mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] usb-storage: Add Hiksemi USB3-FW to IGNORE_UAS On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:55:55PM +0800, nana wrote: > Hi: > > ok,I have upated to v7. > > Sorry , The information in the previous answers about thinkplus(0x17ef, > 0x3899) comes from the tester, which is somewhat confused. > > I just get the device from other department and the detailed test data > are as follows: > > > Test the thinkplus(0x17ef, 0x3899) speed by gnome-disk-utility tool. > > linux(load uas)： linux(not load uas): > > read： 394.2 MB/s read: 382.2 MB/s > > > write: 377.4 MB/s write: 347.8 MB/s > > > --------------------- > > win10(lower than linux,but more stable): > > read : 388.1 MB/s > > write: 320 MB/s > > > The main performance differences is write speed.but load uas can cause error > after long run, not good compatible with uas, So two bosses can > consideration for the third patch is it feasible. Is there any way for you to tell which protocol Windows uses (usb-storage or UAS)? Alan Stern
Hi >Is there any way for you to tell which protocol Windows uses (usb-storage or UAS)? I checked that the device manager was not load the uas driver, And this lower write speed for win10 doesn't seem to use uas protocol for this device. if you have questions for [PATCH v7 3/3], I can continue to investigate thinkplus(0x17ef, 0x3899) and first submit patch v7 1/3 and patch v7 2/3. you have anything unclear ,can ask me or advise me？ Thanks! 在 2022年09月17日 01:21, Alan Stern 写道: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:55:55PM +0800, nana wrote: >> Hi: >> >> ok,I have upated to v7. >> >> Sorry , The information in the previous answers about thinkplus(0x17ef, >> 0x3899) comes from the tester, which is somewhat confused. >> >> I just get the device from other department and the detailed test data >> are as follows: >> >> >> Test the thinkplus(0x17ef, 0x3899) speed by gnome-disk-utility tool. >> >> linux(load uas)： linux(not load uas): >> >> read： 394.2 MB/s read: 382.2 MB/s >> >> >> write: 377.4 MB/s write: 347.8 MB/s >> >> >> --------------------- >> >> win10(lower than linux,but more stable): >> >> read : 388.1 MB/s >> >> write: 320 MB/s >> >> >> The main performance differences is write speed.but load uas can cause error >> after long run, not good compatible with uas, So two bosses can >> consideration for the third patch is it feasible. > Is there any way for you to tell which protocol Windows uses > (usb-storage or UAS)? > > Alan Stern >
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 04:17:41PM +0800, nana wrote: > Hi > > >Is there any way for you to tell which protocol Windows uses > > (usb-storage or UAS)? > > I checked that the device manager was not load the uas driver, And this > lower write speed for win10 doesn't seem to use uas protocol for this > device. Thank you. > if you have questions for [PATCH v7 3/3], I can continue to investigate > thinkplus(0x17ef, 0x3899) and first submit patch v7 1/3 and patch v7 2/3. > you have anything unclear ,can ask me or advise me？ I have already sent Acked-by: messages for the 1/3 and 2/3 patches. You can now add my Acked-by: to the 3/3 patch (the Thinkplus one). Alan Stern
Hi, I'm speaking from my own experience but RTL9210 is arguably the most reliable NVMe-to-USB converter available. Compared to solutions from JMicron (multiple revisions) and ASMedia, RTL9210 gave the lowest power consumption (from implementing proper power management commands) and the least headache. I personally own multiple enclosures and not one gave a single UAS error from multiple platforms (Android, Intel, AMD) for years, but with this commit now, it effectively disables UAS for all RTL9210 enclosures. Would it be possible to apply this quirk only to a specific firmware (range)? RTL9210 have a lot of possible firmware combinations: https://www.station-drivers.com/index.php/en/component/remository/Drivers/Realtek/NVMe-USB-3.1/lang,en-gb/ RTL9210 was available since 2019 and the fact that this quirk came up this late leads me to believe that this is not a widespread issue and it'll be a shame if all of RTL9210s are blacklisted from UAS with Linux from now on :( If any additional information is required, please let me know. Thanks, On 9/15/22 11:49, Hongling Zeng wrote: > The UAS mode of Hiksemi USB_HDD is reported to fail to work on several > platforms with the following error message, then after re-connecting the > device will be offlined and not working at all. > > [ 592.518442][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 18 > inflight: CMD > [ 592.527575][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 03 6f 88 00 00 > 04 00 00 > [ 592.536330][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1 > inflight: CMD > [ 592.545266][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 07 44 1a 88 00 > 00 08 00 > > These disks have a broken uas implementation, the tag field of the status > iu-s is not set properly,so we need to fall-back to usb-storage. > > Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> > --- > Change for v1 > - Change the email real name and the code worng place. > > Change for v2 > -Change spelling error. > > Change for v3 > -Add acked-by > > Change for v4 > -Fix version error > > Change for v5 > -change version > > Change for v6 > -Change the git message for patch 3 > --- > drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > index a6bf87a..8a18d58 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h > @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bc2, 0xab2a, 0x0000, 0x9999, > USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > US_FL_NO_ATA_1X), > > +/* Reported-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> */ > +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bda, 0x9210, 0x0000, 0x9999, > + "Hiksemi", > + "External HDD", > + USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > + US_FL_IGNORE_UAS), > + > /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> */ > UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999, > "Initio Corporation",
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:17:48PM +0900, Juhyung Park wrote: > Hi, > > I'm speaking from my own experience but RTL9210 is arguably the most > reliable NVMe-to-USB converter available. > > Compared to solutions from JMicron (multiple revisions) and ASMedia, RTL9210 > gave the lowest power consumption (from implementing proper power management > commands) and the least headache. > > I personally own multiple enclosures and not one gave a single UAS error > from multiple platforms (Android, Intel, AMD) for years, but with this > commit now, it effectively disables UAS for all RTL9210 enclosures. > > Would it be possible to apply this quirk only to a specific firmware > (range)? RTL9210 have a lot of possible firmware combinations: https://www.station-drivers.com/index.php/en/component/remository/Drivers/Realtek/NVMe-USB-3.1/lang,en-gb/ > > RTL9210 was available since 2019 and the fact that this quirk came up this > late leads me to believe that this is not a widespread issue and it'll be a > shame if all of RTL9210s are blacklisted from UAS with Linux from now on :( > > If any additional information is required, please let me know. Can you send a revert of this commit so that we can fix this up? thanks, greg k-h
Hi: This error not happend on all RTL9210,The uas blacklist only for on sale device(0x0bda, 0x9210). Thanks! zhongling0719@126.com From: Greg KH Date: 2022-11-09 18:40 To: Juhyung Park CC: Hongling Zeng; stern; linux-usb; usb-storage; zhongling0719 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] usb-storage: Add Hiksemi USB3-FW to IGNORE_UAS On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:17:48PM +0900, Juhyung Park wrote: > Hi, > > I'm speaking from my own experience but RTL9210 is arguably the most > reliable NVMe-to-USB converter available. > > Compared to solutions from JMicron (multiple revisions) and ASMedia, RTL9210 > gave the lowest power consumption (from implementing proper power management > commands) and the least headache. > > I personally own multiple enclosures and not one gave a single UAS error > from multiple platforms (Android, Intel, AMD) for years, but with this > commit now, it effectively disables UAS for all RTL9210 enclosures. > > Would it be possible to apply this quirk only to a specific firmware > (range)? RTL9210 have a lot of possible firmware combinations: https://www.station-drivers.com/index.php/en/component/remository/Drivers/Realtek/NVMe-USB-3.1/lang,en-gb/ > > RTL9210 was available since 2019 and the fact that this quirk came up this > late leads me to believe that this is not a widespread issue and it'll be a > shame if all of RTL9210s are blacklisted from UAS with Linux from now on :( > > If any additional information is required, please let me know. Can you send a revert of this commit so that we can fix this up? thanks, greg k-h
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 03:45:36PM +0800, zhongling0719@126.com wrote: > Hi: > This error not happend on all RTL9210,The uas blacklist only for on sale device(0x0bda, 0x9210). What about using the version of the device as the only one to blacklist? Any more specific information you have about that device? thanks, greg k-h
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 4:46 PM zhongling0719@126.com <zhongling0719@126.com> wrote: > > Hi: > This error not happend on all RTL9210,The uas blacklist only for on sale device(0x0bda, 0x9210). 0x0bda is VendorId for Realtek, 0x9210 is ProductId for the entire RTL9210 enclosures. This patch blacklists UAS for all RTL9210 enclosures. > > Thanks! > > zhongling0719@126.com > > From: Greg KH > Date: 2022-11-09 18:40 > To: Juhyung Park > CC: Hongling Zeng; stern; linux-usb; usb-storage; zhongling0719 > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] usb-storage: Add Hiksemi USB3-FW to IGNORE_UAS > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:17:48PM +0900, Juhyung Park wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm speaking from my own experience but RTL9210 is arguably the most > > reliable NVMe-to-USB converter available. > > > > Compared to solutions from JMicron (multiple revisions) and ASMedia, RTL9210 > > gave the lowest power consumption (from implementing proper power management > > commands) and the least headache. > > > > I personally own multiple enclosures and not one gave a single UAS error > > from multiple platforms (Android, Intel, AMD) for years, but with this > > commit now, it effectively disables UAS for all RTL9210 enclosures. > > > > Would it be possible to apply this quirk only to a specific firmware > > (range)? RTL9210 have a lot of possible firmware combinations: https://www.station-drivers.com/index.php/en/component/remository/Drivers/Realtek/NVMe-USB-3.1/lang,en-gb/ > > > > RTL9210 was available since 2019 and the fact that this quirk came up this > > late leads me to believe that this is not a widespread issue and it'll be a > > shame if all of RTL9210s are blacklisted from UAS with Linux from now on :( > > > > If any additional information is required, please let me know. > > Can you send a revert of this commit so that we can fix this up? > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Hi Greg, I've posted a revert commit as there were no attempts to fix this to apply just to the said product (Hiksemi USB3-FW): https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230109115550.71688-1-qkrwngud825@gmail.com/T/#u Thanks. Regards On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 4:56 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 03:45:36PM +0800, zhongling0719@126.com wrote: > > Hi: > > This error not happend on all RTL9210,The uas blacklist only for on sale device(0x0bda, 0x9210). > > What about using the version of the device as the only one to blacklist? > Any more specific information you have about that device? > > thanks, > > greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h index a6bf87a..8a18d58 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bc2, 0xab2a, 0x0000, 0x9999, USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, US_FL_NO_ATA_1X), +/* Reported-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> */ +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x0bda, 0x9210, 0x0000, 0x9999, + "Hiksemi", + "External HDD", + USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL, + US_FL_IGNORE_UAS), + /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> */ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999, "Initio Corporation",
The UAS mode of Hiksemi USB_HDD is reported to fail to work on several platforms with the following error message, then after re-connecting the device will be offlined and not working at all. [ 592.518442][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 18 inflight: CMD [ 592.527575][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#17 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 03 6f 88 00 00 04 00 00 [ 592.536330][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 1 inflight: CMD [ 592.545266][ 2] sd 8:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 07 44 1a 88 00 00 08 00 These disks have a broken uas implementation, the tag field of the status iu-s is not set properly,so we need to fall-back to usb-storage. Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> --- Change for v1 - Change the email real name and the code worng place. Change for v2 -Change spelling error. Change for v3 -Add acked-by Change for v4 -Fix version error Change for v5 -change version Change for v6 -Change the git message for patch 3 --- drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)