diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] bpf, x86: Simplify the parsing logic of structure parameters

Message ID 20230105035026.3091988-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 7f7880495770329d095d402c2865bfa7089192f8
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] bpf, x86: Simplify the parsing logic of structure parameters | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org mingo@redhat.com x86@kernel.org netdev@vger.kernel.org paul.walmsley@sifive.com bp@alien8.de davem@davemloft.net tglx@linutronix.de aou@eecs.berkeley.edu dsahern@kernel.org dave.hansen@linux.intel.com palmer@dabbelt.com hpa@zytor.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Pu Lehui Jan. 5, 2023, 3:50 a.m. UTC 
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Extra_nregs of structure parameters and nr_args can be
added directly at the beginning, and using a flip flag
to identifiy structure parameters. Meantime, renaming
some variables to make them more sense.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---

v2:
- renaming flip flag and add comment for better understanding.
- add ACK by Yonghong.

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230103013158.1945869-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com

 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Jan. 11, 2023, midnight UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Thu,  5 Jan 2023 11:50:26 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> 
> Extra_nregs of structure parameters and nr_args can be
> added directly at the beginning, and using a flip flag
> to identifiy structure parameters. Meantime, renaming
> some variables to make them more sense.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, x86: Simplify the parsing logic of structure parameters
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7f7880495770

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index e3e2b57e4e13..ecdfc7bc45d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1839,62 +1839,59 @@  st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 	return proglen;
 }
 
-static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
+static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs,
 		      int stack_size)
 {
-	int i, j, arg_size, nr_regs;
+	int i, j, arg_size;
+	bool next_same_struct = false;
+
 	/* Store function arguments to stack.
 	 * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be:
 	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rdi
 	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rsi
 	 */
-	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_args, 6); i++) {
-		if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG) {
-			nr_regs = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8;
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) {
+		/* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */
+		arg_size = m->arg_size[j];
+		if (arg_size > 8) {
 			arg_size = 8;
-		} else {
-			nr_regs = 1;
-			arg_size = m->arg_size[i];
+			next_same_struct = !next_same_struct;
 		}
 
-		while (nr_regs) {
-			emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
-				 BPF_REG_FP,
-				 j == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + j,
-				 -(stack_size - j * 8));
-			nr_regs--;
-			j++;
-		}
+		emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
+			 BPF_REG_FP,
+			 i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i,
+			 -(stack_size - i * 8));
+
+		j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1;
 	}
 }
 
-static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
+static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs,
 			 int stack_size)
 {
-	int i, j, arg_size, nr_regs;
+	int i, j, arg_size;
+	bool next_same_struct = false;
 
 	/* Restore function arguments from stack.
 	 * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be:
 	 * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x7D, 0xF0); mov rdi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
 	 * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x75, 0xF8); mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8]
 	 */
-	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_args, 6); i++) {
-		if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG) {
-			nr_regs = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8;
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) {
+		/* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */
+		arg_size = m->arg_size[j];
+		if (arg_size > 8) {
 			arg_size = 8;
-		} else {
-			nr_regs = 1;
-			arg_size = m->arg_size[i];
+			next_same_struct = !next_same_struct;
 		}
 
-		while (nr_regs) {
-			emit_ldx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
-				 j == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + j,
-				 BPF_REG_FP,
-				 -(stack_size - j * 8));
-			nr_regs--;
-			j++;
-		}
+		emit_ldx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
+			 i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i,
+			 BPF_REG_FP,
+			 -(stack_size - i * 8));
+
+		j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2120,8 +2117,8 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 				struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
 				void *func_addr)
 {
-	int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args, extra_nregs = 0;
-	int regs_off, ip_off, args_off, stack_size = nr_args * 8, run_ctx_off;
+	int i, ret, nr_regs = m->nr_args, stack_size = 0;
+	int regs_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off;
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
@@ -2130,17 +2127,14 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	u8 *prog;
 	bool save_ret;
 
-	/* x86-64 supports up to 6 arguments. 7+ can be added in the future */
-	if (nr_args > 6)
-		return -ENOTSUPP;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS; i++) {
+	/* extra registers for struct arguments */
+	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
 		if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
-			extra_nregs += (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8 - 1;
-	}
-	if (nr_args + extra_nregs > 6)
+			nr_regs += (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8 - 1;
+
+	/* x86-64 supports up to 6 arguments. 7+ can be added in the future */
+	if (nr_regs > 6)
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
-	stack_size += extra_nregs * 8;
 
 	/* Generated trampoline stack layout:
 	 *
@@ -2154,7 +2148,7 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	 *                 [ ...             ]
 	 * RBP - regs_off  [ reg_arg1        ]  program's ctx pointer
 	 *
-	 * RBP - args_off  [ arg regs count  ]  always
+	 * RBP - nregs_off [ regs count	     ]  always
 	 *
 	 * RBP - ip_off    [ traced function ]  BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag
 	 *
@@ -2166,11 +2160,12 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	if (save_ret)
 		stack_size += 8;
 
+	stack_size += nr_regs * 8;
 	regs_off = stack_size;
 
-	/* args count  */
+	/* regs count  */
 	stack_size += 8;
-	args_off = stack_size;
+	nregs_off = stack_size;
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG)
 		stack_size += 8; /* room for IP address argument */
@@ -2198,11 +2193,11 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	EMIT1(0x53);		 /* push rbx */
 
 	/* Store number of argument registers of the traced function:
-	 *   mov rax, nr_args + extra_nregs
-	 *   mov QWORD PTR [rbp - args_off], rax
+	 *   mov rax, nr_regs
+	 *   mov QWORD PTR [rbp - nregs_off], rax
 	 */
-	emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_0, 0, (u32) nr_args + extra_nregs);
-	emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off);
+	emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_0, 0, (u32) nr_regs);
+	emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -nregs_off);
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG) {
 		/* Store IP address of the traced function:
@@ -2213,7 +2208,7 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -ip_off);
 	}
 
-	save_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
+	save_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off);
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		/* arg1: mov rdi, im */
@@ -2243,7 +2238,7 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	}
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
-		restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
+		restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off);
 
 		if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) {
 			emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
@@ -2284,7 +2279,7 @@  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 		}
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS)
-		restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
+		restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off);
 
 	/* This needs to be done regardless. If there were fmod_ret programs,
 	 * the return value is only updated on the stack and still needs to be