diff mbox series

[RFC,v3,12/28] target/arm: Wrap arm_rebuild_hflags calls with tcg_enabled

Message ID 20230113140419.4013-13-farosas@suse.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds | expand

Commit Message

Fabiano Rosas Jan. 13, 2023, 2:04 p.m. UTC
This is in preparation to moving the hflags code into its own file
under the tcg/ directory.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
---
I extracted these into a separate patch so we can discuss. If I move
the tcg_enabled check to a header that would add overhead for all the
calls where we know for sure that the code is running with TCG. And I
don't think we want a new arm_rebuild_hflags_foo to be used for common
code.
---
 hw/arm/boot.c             |  6 +++++-
 hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c     | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 target/arm/arm-powerctl.c |  7 +++++--
 target/arm/cpregs.c       |  2 +-
 target/arm/cpu.c          |  3 ++-
 target/arm/helper.c       | 16 ++++++++++++----
 target/arm/machine.c      |  5 ++++-
 7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Richard Henderson Jan. 13, 2023, 9:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/13/23 06:04, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> This is in preparation to moving the hflags code into its own file
> under the tcg/ directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas<farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> I extracted these into a separate patch so we can discuss. If I move
> the tcg_enabled check to a header that would add overhead for all the
> calls where we know for sure that the code is running with TCG. And I
> don't think we want a new arm_rebuild_hflags_foo to be used for common
> code.
> ---
>   hw/arm/boot.c             |  6 +++++-
>   hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c     | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>   target/arm/arm-powerctl.c |  7 +++++--
>   target/arm/cpregs.c       |  2 +-
>   target/arm/cpu.c          |  3 ++-
>   target/arm/helper.c       | 16 ++++++++++++----
>   target/arm/machine.c      |  5 ++++-
>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Jan. 17, 2023, 4:27 p.m. UTC | #2
On 13/1/23 15:04, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> This is in preparation to moving the hflags code into its own file
> under the tcg/ directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> I extracted these into a separate patch so we can discuss. If I move
> the tcg_enabled check to a header that would add overhead for all the
> calls where we know for sure that the code is running with TCG. And I
> don't think we want a new arm_rebuild_hflags_foo to be used for common
> code.
> ---
>   hw/arm/boot.c             |  6 +++++-
>   hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c     | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>   target/arm/arm-powerctl.c |  7 +++++--
>   target/arm/cpregs.c       |  2 +-
>   target/arm/cpu.c          |  3 ++-
>   target/arm/helper.c       | 16 ++++++++++++----
>   target/arm/machine.c      |  5 ++++-
>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Shouldn't we also restrict arm_rebuild_hflags() to CONFIG_TCG in
target/arm/cpu.h (to be sure future code using this helper stays
TCG-only)?
Fabiano Rosas Jan. 17, 2023, 7 p.m. UTC | #3
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:

> On 13/1/23 15:04, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> This is in preparation to moving the hflags code into its own file
>> under the tcg/ directory.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> I extracted these into a separate patch so we can discuss. If I move
>> the tcg_enabled check to a header that would add overhead for all the
>> calls where we know for sure that the code is running with TCG. And I
>> don't think we want a new arm_rebuild_hflags_foo to be used for common
>> code.
>> ---
>>   hw/arm/boot.c             |  6 +++++-
>>   hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c     | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>>   target/arm/arm-powerctl.c |  7 +++++--
>>   target/arm/cpregs.c       |  2 +-
>>   target/arm/cpu.c          |  3 ++-
>>   target/arm/helper.c       | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>   target/arm/machine.c      |  5 ++++-
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Shouldn't we also restrict arm_rebuild_hflags() to CONFIG_TCG in
> target/arm/cpu.h (to be sure future code using this helper stays
> TCG-only)?

We could, but in practice hflags.c is already under CONFIG_TCG
anyway. If people don't build with disable-tcg they will not notice.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
index 3d7d11f782..1e021c4a34 100644
--- a/hw/arm/boot.c
+++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ 
 #include "hw/arm/boot.h"
 #include "hw/arm/linux-boot-if.h"
 #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/tcg.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "sysemu/numa.h"
 #include "hw/boards.h"
@@ -827,7 +828,10 @@  static void do_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
                 info->secondary_cpu_reset_hook(cpu, info);
             }
         }
-        arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+
+        if (tcg_enabled()) {
+            arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+        }
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index 1f7763964c..74ac8f610c 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ 
 #include "hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.h"
 #include "hw/irq.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
+#include "sysemu/tcg.h"
 #include "sysemu/runstate.h"
 #include "target/arm/cpu.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
@@ -2466,8 +2467,10 @@  static MemTxResult nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
     /* This is UNPREDICTABLE; treat as RAZ/WI */
 
  exit_ok:
-    /* Ensure any changes made are reflected in the cached hflags.  */
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(&s->cpu->env);
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        /* Ensure any changes made are reflected in the cached hflags. */
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(&s->cpu->env);
+    }
     return MEMTX_OK;
 }
 
@@ -2648,11 +2651,14 @@  static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
         }
     }
 
-    /*
-     * We updated state that affects the CPU's MMUidx and thus its hflags;
-     * and we can't guarantee that we run before the CPU reset function.
-     */
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(&s->cpu->env);
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        /*
+         * We updated state that affects the CPU's MMUidx and thus its
+         * hflags; and we can't guarantee that we run before the CPU
+         * reset function.
+         */
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(&s->cpu->env);
+    }
 }
 
 static void nvic_systick_trigger(void *opaque, int n, int level)
diff --git a/target/arm/arm-powerctl.c b/target/arm/arm-powerctl.c
index b75f813b40..326a03153d 100644
--- a/target/arm/arm-powerctl.c
+++ b/target/arm/arm-powerctl.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ 
 #include "arm-powerctl.h"
 #include "qemu/log.h"
 #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
+#include "sysemu/tcg.h"
 
 #ifndef DEBUG_ARM_POWERCTL
 #define DEBUG_ARM_POWERCTL 0
@@ -127,8 +128,10 @@  static void arm_set_cpu_on_async_work(CPUState *target_cpu_state,
         target_cpu->env.regs[0] = info->context_id;
     }
 
-    /* CP15 update requires rebuilding hflags */
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(&target_cpu->env);
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        /* CP15 update requires rebuilding hflags */
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(&target_cpu->env);
+    }
 
     /* Start the new CPU at the requested address */
     cpu_set_pc(target_cpu_state, info->entry);
diff --git a/target/arm/cpregs.c b/target/arm/cpregs.c
index dee03f8a41..a353fb9b03 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpregs.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpregs.c
@@ -5179,7 +5179,7 @@  static void sctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
     /* This may enable/disable the MMU, so do a TLB flush.  */
     tlb_flush(CPU(cpu));
 
-    if (ri->type & ARM_CP_SUPPRESS_TB_END) {
+    if (tcg_enabled() && ri->type & ARM_CP_SUPPRESS_TB_END) {
         /*
          * Normally we would always end the TB on an SCTLR write; see the
          * comment in ARMCPRegInfo sctlr initialization below for why Xscale
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index d7ceb626f0..ce1a425e10 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -539,8 +539,9 @@  static void arm_cpu_reset_hold(Object *obj)
     if (tcg_enabled()) {
         hw_breakpoint_update_all(cpu);
         hw_watchpoint_update_all(cpu);
+
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
     }
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_TCG) && !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 0c3e72a266..5188d0ddbf 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -340,7 +340,9 @@  void aarch64_set_svcr(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t new, uint64_t mask)
         memset(env->zarray, 0, sizeof(env->zarray));
     }
 
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+    }
 }
 #endif /* TARGET_AARCH64 */
 
@@ -609,7 +611,7 @@  void cpsr_write(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t val, uint32_t mask,
     }
     mask &= ~CACHED_CPSR_BITS;
     env->uncached_cpsr = (env->uncached_cpsr & ~mask) | (val & mask);
-    if (rebuild_hflags) {
+    if (tcg_enabled() && rebuild_hflags) {
         arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
     }
 }
@@ -1168,7 +1170,10 @@  static void take_aarch32_exception(CPUARMState *env, int new_mode,
         env->regs[14] = env->regs[15] + offset;
     }
     env->regs[15] = newpc;
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
+    }
 }
 
 static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch32_hyp(CPUState *cs)
@@ -1724,7 +1729,10 @@  static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs)
     pstate_write(env, PSTATE_DAIF | new_mode);
     env->aarch64 = true;
     aarch64_restore_sp(env, new_el);
-    helper_rebuild_hflags_a64(env, new_el);
+
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        helper_rebuild_hflags_a64(env, new_el);
+    }
 
     env->pc = addr;
 
diff --git a/target/arm/machine.c b/target/arm/machine.c
index fd6323f6d8..fc4a4a4064 100644
--- a/target/arm/machine.c
+++ b/target/arm/machine.c
@@ -871,7 +871,10 @@  static int cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
     if (!kvm_enabled()) {
         pmu_op_finish(&cpu->env);
     }
-    arm_rebuild_hflags(&cpu->env);
+
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        arm_rebuild_hflags(&cpu->env);
+    }
 
     return 0;
 }