diff mbox series

[bpf-next,2/2] bpf: remove a redundant parameter of bpf_prog_free_id()

Message ID 20230117060249.912679-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: two trivial cleanup patches | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1393 this patch: 1393
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com song@kernel.org yhs@fb.com andrii@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@google.com jolsa@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 149 this patch: 149
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1388 this patch: 1388
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 70 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ${{ matrix.test }} on ${{ matrix.arch }} with ${{ matrix.toolchain }}
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 fail Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Cong Wang Jan. 17, 2023, 6:02 a.m. UTC 
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>

The second parameter of bpf_prog_free_id() is always true,
hence can be just eliminated.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  |  2 +-
 kernel/bpf/offload.c |  2 +-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 23 +++++------------------
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Jiri Olsa Jan. 17, 2023, 9:40 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:02:49PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> 
> The second parameter of bpf_prog_free_id() is always true,
> hence can be just eliminated.

hi,
Paul did this already:
  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230106154400.74211-2-paul@paul-moore.com/

it's in bpf/master now

bpf_map_free_id change lgtm, but might be better
to sync with bpf/master first

jirka

> 
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h  |  2 +-
>  kernel/bpf/offload.c |  2 +-
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 23 +++++------------------
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 3558c192871c..2c0d2383cea0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ void bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
>  struct bpf_prog * __must_check bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog);
>  void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
>  
> -void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock);
> +void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog);
>  void bpf_map_free_id(struct bpf_map *map);
>  
>  struct btf_field *btf_record_find(const struct btf_record *rec,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> index ae6d5a5c0798..658032e294ed 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  		offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
>  
>  	/* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
> -	bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
> +	bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
>  
>  	list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
>  	kfree(offload);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 1eaa1a18aef7..b56f65328d9c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_alloc_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	return id > 0 ? 0 : id;
>  }
>  
> -void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
> +void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> @@ -2000,18 +2000,10 @@ void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
>  	if (!prog->aux->id)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (do_idr_lock)
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
> -	else
> -		__acquire(&prog_idr_lock);
> -
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
>  	idr_remove(&prog_idr, prog->aux->id);
>  	prog->aux->id = 0;
> -
> -	if (do_idr_lock)
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
> -	else
> -		__release(&prog_idr_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> @@ -2057,13 +2049,13 @@ static void bpf_prog_put_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
>  	__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, true);
>  }
>  
> -static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
> +void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = prog->aux;
>  
>  	if (atomic64_dec_and_test(&aux->refcnt)) {
>  		/* bpf_prog_free_id() must be called first */
> -		bpf_prog_free_id(prog, do_idr_lock);
> +		bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
>  
>  		if (in_irq() || irqs_disabled()) {
>  			INIT_WORK(&aux->work, bpf_prog_put_deferred);
> @@ -2073,11 +2065,6 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -
> -void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> -{
> -	__bpf_prog_put(prog, true);
> -}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_put);
>  
>  static int bpf_prog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3558c192871c..2c0d2383cea0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@  void bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 struct bpf_prog * __must_check bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 
-void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock);
+void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 void bpf_map_free_id(struct bpf_map *map);
 
 struct btf_field *btf_record_find(const struct btf_record *rec,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index ae6d5a5c0798..658032e294ed 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@  static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
 
 	/* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
-	bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
+	bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
 
 	list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
 	kfree(offload);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 1eaa1a18aef7..b56f65328d9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@  static int bpf_prog_alloc_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	return id > 0 ? 0 : id;
 }
 
-void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
+void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -2000,18 +2000,10 @@  void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
 	if (!prog->aux->id)
 		return;
 
-	if (do_idr_lock)
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
-	else
-		__acquire(&prog_idr_lock);
-
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
 	idr_remove(&prog_idr, prog->aux->id);
 	prog->aux->id = 0;
-
-	if (do_idr_lock)
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
-	else
-		__release(&prog_idr_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
@@ -2057,13 +2049,13 @@  static void bpf_prog_put_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
 	__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, true);
 }
 
-static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
+void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = prog->aux;
 
 	if (atomic64_dec_and_test(&aux->refcnt)) {
 		/* bpf_prog_free_id() must be called first */
-		bpf_prog_free_id(prog, do_idr_lock);
+		bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
 
 		if (in_irq() || irqs_disabled()) {
 			INIT_WORK(&aux->work, bpf_prog_put_deferred);
@@ -2073,11 +2065,6 @@  static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
 		}
 	}
 }
-
-void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	__bpf_prog_put(prog, true);
-}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_put);
 
 static int bpf_prog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)